Ranking Intervals and Dominance Relations for Ratio-Based Efficiency Analysis

References

• Ahn T., Charnes A., Cooper W. W. Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (1988) 22(6):259–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen R., Athanassopoulos A., Dyson R. G., Thanassoulis E. Weight restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions. Ann. Oper. Res. (1997) 73:13–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen P., Petersen N. C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in DEA. Management Sci. (1993) 39(10):1261–1264Link, Google Scholar
• Avkiran N. K., Parker B. R. Pushing the DEA research envelope. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (2010) 44(1):1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker R. C., Talluri S. A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Comput. Indust. Engrg. (1997) 32(1):101–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton V., Gear T. On a shortcoming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega (1983) 11(3):228–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouyssou D. Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: Some remarks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1999) 50(9):974–978Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2(6):429–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Huang Z. M., Sun D. B. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J. Econometrics (1990) 46(1–2):73–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook W. D., Zhu J. CAR-DEA: Context-dependent assurance regions in DEA. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(1):69–78Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper W. W., Seiford M., Tone K.Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software (2007) 2nd ed.(Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Doyle J., Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1994) 45(5):567–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):249–258Link, Google Scholar
• Dyson R. G., Allen R., Camanho A. S., Podinovski V. V., Sarrico C. S., Shale E. A. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 132(2):245–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eilat H., Golany B., Shtub A. R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach. Omega (2008) 36(5):895–912Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emrouznejada A., Barnett B. R., Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (2008) 42(3):151–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farzipoor S. R. Technology selection in the presence of imprecise data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors. Internat. J. Adv. Manufacturing Tech. (2009) 41(7–8):827–838Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galagedera D. U. A., Silvapulle P. Experimental evidence on robustness of DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2003) 54(6):654–660Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia F., Marcuello C., Serrano D., Urbina O. Evaluation of efficiency in primary health care centres: An application of data envelopment analysis. Financial Accountability Management (2002) 51(1):67–83Google Scholar
• Gouveia M. C., Dias L. C., Antunes C. H. Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2008) 59(1):54–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halme M., Korhonen P. Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 126(1):175–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halme M., Joro T., Korhonen P., Salo S., Wallenius J. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(1):103–115Link, Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth B., Dawson P. J., Maniadakis N. Efficiency measurement of health care: A review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Management Sci. (1999) 2(3):161–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnes J. Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Econom. Ed. Rev. (2006) 25(3):273–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joro T., Korhonen P., Wallenius J. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):962–970Link, Google Scholar
• Korhonen P., Soismaa M., Siljamäki A. On the use of value efficiency analysis and some further developments. J. Productivity Anal. (2002) 17(1–2):49–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korhonen P., Tainio R., Wallenius J. Value efficiency analysis of academic research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 130(1):121–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köksalan M., Büyükbaşaran T., Özpeynirci Ö., Wallenius J. A flexible approach to ranking with an application to MBA programs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 201(2):470–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu N. C., Cheng Y. The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Ed. Eur. (2005) 30(2):127–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan Y. A.Health Care Benchmarking and Evaluation: An Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis (2008) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Podinovski V. V. DEA models for the explicit maximization of relative efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 131(3):572–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podinovski V. V. The explicit role of weight bounds in models of data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2005) 56(12):1408–1481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo A. Interactive decision aiding for group decision support. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 84(1):134–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo A., Hämäläinen R. P. Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(6):1053–1061Link, Google Scholar
• Salo A., Hämäläinen R. P. On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1997) 6(6):309–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo A., Hämäläinen R. P. Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)—Elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (2001) 31(6):533–545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarrico S. C., Dyson R. G. Using DEA for planning in UK universities—An institutional perspective. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2000) 51(7):789–800Google Scholar
• Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all of the data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998a) 49(10):1060–1071Google Scholar
• Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998b) 108(1):127–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sexton T. R., Silkman R. H., Hogan A., Silkman R. H. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. Measuring the Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis (1986) (American Evaluation Association, Jossey Bass Inc., San Francisco) 73–104Google Scholar
• Shafer S. M., Bradford J. W. Efficiency measurements of alternate machine component grouping solutions via data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1995) 42(2):159–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart T. J. Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1996) 47(5):654–665Google Scholar
• Talluri S., Yoon K. P. A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2000) 66(2):119–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tauer L. W., Fried H. O., Fry W. E. Measuring efficiencies of academic departments within a college. Ed. Econom. (2007) 15(4):473–489Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis E., Portela M. C., Allen R., Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Zhu J. Incorporating value judgements in DEA. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis (2004) (Kluwer, Boston) 99–137Google Scholar
• Thompson R. G., Singleton F., Thrall R., Smith B. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces (1986) 16(6):35–49Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson R. G., Langemeier L. N., Lee C. T., Lee E., Thrall R. M. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. J. Econometrics (1990) 46(1–2):93–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu J. Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 90(3):451–460Crossref, Google Scholar