Status, Quality, and Attention: What's in a (Missing) Name?

References

• Ai C., Norton E. C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(1):123–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayres I., Waldfogel J. A market test for race discrimination in bail setting. Stanford Law Rev. (1994) 46(5):987–1047Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G. S. Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101(3):385–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. Status, quality, and social order in the california wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(3):563–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Rosenholtz S., Zelditch M. Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1980) 6:479–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blank R. M. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(5):1041–1067Google Scholar
• Bothner M. S., Haynes R., Lee W., Smith N. When do Matthew Effects occur? J. Math Sociol. (2010) 34(2):80–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S. Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature (2008) 47(2):315–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esteves-Sorenson C. Micro-costs: Inertia in television viewing. (2009) . Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Feldman M. S., March J. G. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(2):171–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Waguespack D. M. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):165–180Link, Google Scholar
• Fuller B. (2006) . Phone interview with Dave M. Waguespack, November 14Google Scholar
• Goldin C., Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):715–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould R. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. (2002) 107(5):1143–1178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M., Roy A. Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(3):495–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knowles J., Persico N., Todd P. Racial bias in motor vehicle searches: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109(1):203–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D. M., Wilson R. Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):253–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The Matthew Effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris S., Shin H. S. Social value of public information. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1521–1534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mouw T. Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of recent research. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2006) 32(1):79–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D., Simcoe T. Is the Internet a U.S. invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking. Res. Policy (2002) 31(8–9):1369–1387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D., Zuckerman E. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(2):379–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piskorski M. J. Positions of power and status: Reciprocity in the venture capital industry. (2007) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M.Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (2005) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Phillips D. J. The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5(2):453–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J., Stuart T. A role-based ecology of technological-change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100(5):1224–1260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Greve H., Davis G. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):502–526Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V., Williamson I., Petkova A., Sever J. Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):1033–1049Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T. Standard setting committees. (2008) . Working paper, Boston University, Boston. http://ssrn.com/abstract=899595Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Waguespack D. M. Social structure and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2006) 51(4):560–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M. Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. (1973) 87(3):355–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart D. Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(5):823–842Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strutt R. J.The Life of John William Strutt: Third Baron Rayleigh (1968) (University of Milwaukee Press, Milwaukee) Google Scholar
• Stuart T., Hoang H., Hybels R. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waguespack D. M., Fleming L. Scanning the commons? Evidence on the benefits to startups of participation in open standards development. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):210–223Link, Google Scholar
• Washington M., Zajac E. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(2):282–296Crossref, Google Scholar