A New Goodness-of-Fit Test for Event Forecasting and Its Application to Credit Defaults

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1283

References

  • Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rational devant le risque. Econometrica (1953) 21(4):503–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews D. W. K. Cross-section regression with common shocks. Econometrica (2005) 73(5):1551–1573CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Archer K. J., Lemeshow S., Hosmer D. W. Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. (2007) 51(9):4450–4464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart H. X., Williamson J. M. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses. Biometrics (1998) 54(2):720–729CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. (2004) . A Revised Framework, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Studies on the validation of internal rating systems. (2005) . Working Paper 14, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision making. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1485–1496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blöchlinger A., Leippold M. Economic benefit of powerful credit scoring. J. Banking Finance (2006) 30(2):851–873CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blochwitz S., Hohl S., Wehn C. S. Reconsidering ratings. (2005) . Working paper, Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Copas J. B. Unweighted sum of squares test for proportions. Appl. Statist. (1989) 38(1):71–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cubitt R. P., Starmer C., Sugden R. Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: An experimental investigation. Econom. J. (1998) 108(450):1363–1381Google Scholar
  • Das S. R., Duffie D., Kapadia N., Saita L. Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated. J. Finance (2007) 62(1):93–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawid A. P. The well-calibrated Bayesian. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1982) 77(379):605–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans S. R., Hosmer D. W. Goodness of fit tests for mixed effects logistic models. Comm. Statist.: Theory Methods (2004) 33(5):1139–1155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrington C. P. On assessing goodness of fit of generalized linear models to sparse data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1996) 58(2):349–360Google Scholar
  • Fehr-Duda H., de Gennaro M., Schubert R. Gender, financial risk, and probability. Theory Decision (2006) 60(2):283–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeman J. J., le Cessie S. A goodness-of-fit test for multinomial logistic regression. Statistics (2007) 62(4):980–985Google Scholar
  • Gonzales R., Wu G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38(1):129–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordy M. B. A comparative anatomy of credit risk models. J. Banking Finance (2000) 24(1–2):119–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordy M. B. A risk-factor model foundation for ratings-based bank capital rules. J. Financial Intermediation (2003) 12(3):199–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall P., Heyde C. C.Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hanson S., Schuermann T. Confidence intervals for probabilities of default. J. Banking Finance (2006) 30(8):2281–2301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harbaugh W. T., Krause K., Vesterlund L. Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experiment. Econom. (2002) 5(1):53–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horton N. J., Bebchuk J. D., Jones C. L., Lipsitz S. R., Catalano P. J., Zahner G. E. P., Fitzmaurice G. M. Goodness of fit for GEE: An example with mental health service utilization. Statist. Medicine (1999) 18(2):213–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S. Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Comm. Statist.—Theory and Methods (1980) 9(10):1043–1069CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S.Applied Logistic Regression (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hosmer D. W., Hosmer T., le Cessie S., Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness–of–fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statist. Medicine (1997) 16(9):965–980CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karr A. F.Probability (1993) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolmogorov A. N. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. Giornale Dell'Instituto Ital. Degli Attuari (1933) 4:83–91Google Scholar
  • Kolmogorov A. N. Confidence limits for an unknown distribution function. Ann. Math. Statist. (1941) 12(4):461–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koyluoglu H. U., Hickman A. Reconcilable differences. Risk (1998) October):56–62Google Scholar
  • Lipsitz S. R., Fitzmaurice G. M., Molenberghs G. Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models. Appl. Statist. (1996) 45(2):175–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCullagh P. On the asymptotic distribution of pearson's statistic in linear exponential-family models. Internat. Statist. Rev. (1985) 53(1):61–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Müller U., Osius G. Asymptotic normality of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse Poisson data. Statistics (2003) 37(2):119–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noether G. E. Note on the Kolmogorov statistic in the discrete case. Metrika (1963) 7(1):115–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orme C. The calculation of the information matrix test for binary data models. The Manchester School (1988) 56(4):370–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osius G., Rojek D. Normal goodness-of-fit tests for multinomial models with large degrees of freedom. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1992) 87(420):1145–1152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pan W. Goodness of fit for GEE with correlated binary data. Scandinavian J. Statist. (2002) 29(1):101–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pigeon J. G., Heyse J. F. A cautionary note about assessing the fit of logistic regression models. J. Appl. Statist. (1999a) 26(7):847–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pigeon J. G., Heyse J. F. An improved goodness of fit statistic for probability prediction models. Biometrical J. (1999b) 41(1):71–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slakter M. J. A comparison of the Pearson chi-square and Kolmogorov goodness-of-fit tests with respect to validity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1965) 60(311):854–858CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smirnov N. V. On the estimation of the discrepancy between empirical curves of distribution for two independent samples. Bulletin Mathématique de l'Université de Moscou (1939) 2Facsimile 2Google Scholar
  • Stephens M. A. EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1974) 69(347):730–737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsiatis A. A. A note on a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. Biometrika (1980) 67(1):250–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilde T. CreditRisk+—A credit risk management framework. (1997) . Technical document, Credit Suisse, LondonGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.