Reference-Point Formation and Updating

References

• Ariely D., Zauberman G. On the making of an experience: The effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation. J. Behav. Decision Making (2000) 13(2):219–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes H., Hirshleifer D., Jiang D., Lim S. Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2008) 105(1):67–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes H., Hirshleifer D., Jiang D., Lim S. A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: Evidence from China, Korea and the US. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2010) 112(2):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B. M., Odean T. All the glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. (2008) 21(2):785–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N., Xiong W. What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance (2009) 64(2):751–784Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M., Sarin R. K. Predicting utility under satiation and habit formation. Management Sci. (2010) 56(2):286–301Link, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M. H., Neale M. A.Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bell D. R., Lattin J. M. Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: The confounding effect of price response heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):185–200Link, Google Scholar
• Boles T. L., Messick D. M. A reverse outcome bias: The infuence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 61(3):262–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 288–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H. A., Rao A. R. Close encounters of two kinds: False alarms and dashed hopes. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):178–196Link, Google Scholar
• Compte O., Jehiel P. Bargaining with reference dependent preferences. (2003) . Working paper, CERAS-ENPC, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Core J. E., Guay W. R. Stock option plans for nonexecutive employees. J. Financial Econom. (2001) 61(2):253–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus H.Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology (1913) (Teachers College, Columbia University, New York) . (Reprint Thoemmes Press, Bristol, UK, 1999.)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng L., Seasholes M. S. Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Rev. Finance (2005) 9(3):305–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazzini A. The disposition effect and underreaction to news. J. Finance (2006) 61(4):2017–2046Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B. S., Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):402–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser M., Langer T., Reynders J., Weber M. Framing effects in stock market forecasts: The difference between asking for prices and asking for returns. Rev. Finance (2007) 11(2):325–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Zwick R., Rapoport A. Updating the reference level: Experimental evidence. Experimental Business Research (2005) 3(Springer, Berlin) 263–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M., Keloharju M. What makes investors trade? J. Finance (2001) 56(2):589–616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardie B. G. S., Johnson E. J., Fader P. S. Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(4):378–394Link, Google Scholar
• Heath C., Huddart S., Lang M. Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quart. J. Econom. (1999a) 114(2):601–627Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C., Larrick R. P., Wu G. Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. (1999b) 38(1):79–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helson H.Adaption Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior (1964) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Huddart S., Lang M., Yetman M. H. Volume and price patterns around a stock's 52-week highs and lows: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):16–31Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 51(2):296–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Wakker P. P., Sarin R. K. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):375–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopalle P. K., Rao A. G., Assunção J. L. Asymetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):60–85Link, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B., Rabin M. A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. (2006) 121(4):1133–1166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):623–644Link, Google Scholar
• Lattin J. M., Bucklin R. E. Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(3):299–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K., Dembo T., Festinger L., Sears P. S., Hunt J. McV. Level of aspiration. Personality and the Behavior Disorders (1944) 1(Ronald, New York) 333–378Google Scholar
• March J. G. Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. J. Political Econom. Behav. Organ. (1988) 9(1):5–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Shapira Z. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. (1992) 99(1):172–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T., Raj S. P., Sinha I. Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing (2005) 69(4):84–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novemsky N., Schweitzer M. E. What makes negotiators happy? The differential effects of internal and external social comparisons on negotiator satisfaction. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 95(2):186–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance (1998) 53(5):1775–1798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ordóñez L., Connolly T., Coughlan R. Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. J. Behav. Decision Making (2000) 13(3):329–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popescu I., Wu Y. Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(3):413–429Link, Google Scholar
• Prelec D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica (1998) 66(3):497–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putler D. S. Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(3):287–309Link, Google Scholar
• Shefrin H., Statman M. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance (1985) 40(3):777–790Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Level of aspiration and decision making. Psych. Rev. (1957) 64(4):253–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan K., Kida T. The effect of multiple reference points and prior gains and losses on managers' risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 64(1):76–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):1039–1061Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wathieu L. Habits and the anomalies in intertemporal choice. Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1552–1563Link, Google Scholar
• Weber M., Camerer C. F. The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1998) 33(2):167–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winer R. S. A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13(2):250–256Crossref, Google Scholar