New Plant Venture Performance Differences Among Incumbent, Diversifying, and Entrepreneurial Firms: The Impact of Industry Learning Intensity

References

• Ackerberg D., Caves K., Frazer G. Structural estimation of production functions: An application to the timing of input choices. (2005) . Working paper, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Agarwal R., Gort M. The evolution of markets and entry, exit, and survival of firms. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1996) 78(3):489–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Helfat C. Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):281–293Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Sarkar M. B., Echambadi R. The conditioning effect of time: A life cycle approach. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(8):971–994Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Bahk B. H., Gort M. Decomposing learning by doing in new plants. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101(4):561–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T., Nelson R. E. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(3):329–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian N., Lieberman M. Industry learning environments and the heterogeneity of firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(4):390–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian N., Lieberman M. Learning-by-doing and market structure. J. Indust. Econom. (2011) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Butler R. J. A project milestone bonus plan: Bringing a plant startup on-line, on time, on cost. National Productivity Rev. (1991) 11(1):31–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R., Bigelow L. S., Seidel M. L., Tsai L. B. The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(S1):117–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen P., Williams C., Agarwal R. Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collis D. J. Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S1):143–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S. J., Haltiwanger J. Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):819–863Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doeringer P. B., Klock C. E., Terkla D. G.Start-Up Factories: High-Performance Management, Job Quality, and Regional Advantage (2002) (Oxford University Press and W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, New York) Google Scholar
• Dutton J. M., Thomas A. Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):235–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):58–70Link, Google Scholar
• Foster L., Haltiwanger J. C., Syverson C. Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(1):394–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M., Agarwal R. Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups over the industry life cycle: A complexity approach. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34:228–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P. Building strategy on the experience curve. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 63(2):143–149Google Scholar
• Griliches Z., Mairesse J., Strom S. Production functions: The search for identification. Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 169–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J., Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):29–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haller M., Peikert A., Thoma J. Cycle time management during production ramp-up. Robotics Comput.-Integrated Manufacturing (2003) 19(1):183–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison R. T., Leitch C. M. Entrepreneurial learning: Researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2005) 29(4):351–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R. H., Wheelwright S. C.Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing (1984) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Hayes R. H., Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization (1988) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Lieberman M. B. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):725–760Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M., Singh H., Teece D., Winter S.Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organisations (2007) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden) Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holbrook D., Hounshell D., Cohen W., Klepper S. The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1017–1042Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopenhayn H. Entry, exit and firm dynamics in the long run. Econometrica (1992) 60(5):1127–1150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. G. Capital-market imperfections and investment. J. Econom. Literature (1998) 36(1):193–225Google Scholar
• Karim S., Mitchell W. Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1061–1081Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Shane S. When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):814–829Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):645–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane S. J. Entry and industry evolution in the ATM manufacturers' market. (1989) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein B. B., Lumpkin G. T., Shrader R. C., Katz J. A., Shepherd D. A. Organization learning by new plant ventures: Concepts, strategies, and applications. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 6: Cognition and Decision Making in the Entrepreneurial Context (2003) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 11–36Google Scholar
• Lieberman M. B. The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15(2):213–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher J. T., Mowery D. C. Measuring dynamic capabilities: Practices and performance in semiconductor manufacturing. British J. Management (2009) 20(S1):41–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mann D. W. Steelcase learns how teamwork evolves effectively under lean production. J. Organ. Excellence (2002) 21(3):43–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masternak R. L. Gainsharing boosts quality and productivity at a BFGoodrich plant. Natl. Productivity Rev. (1993) 12(2):225–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Dual clocks: Entry order influences on industry incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(2):85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Sampat B. N., Ziedonis A. A. Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of U.S. university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981–1992. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):73–89Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Olley G. S., Pakes A. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry. Econometrica (1996) 64(6):1263–1297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Pisano G. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S1):85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T., Hill C. W. L. Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):52–70Link, Google Scholar
• Schoonhoven C. B., Eisenhardt K. M., Lyman K. Speeding products to market: Waiting time to product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):177–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J.Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth (2009) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson P. How much did the Liberty shipbuilders learn? New evidence for an old case study. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109(1):103–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson P. Selection and firm survival: Evidence from the shipbuilding industry, 1825–1914. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2005) 87(1):26–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(S1):119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S., Sapienza H. J., Davidsson P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43(4):917–955Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351Link, Google Scholar