Sabotage in Tournaments: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment

References

• Abbink K., Hennig-Schmidt H. Neutral versus loaded instructions in a bribery experiment. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(2):103–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbink K., Sadrieh A. RatImage—Research assistance toolbox for computer-aided human behavior experiments. (1995) . Sonderforschungsbereich Paper B-325, University of Bonn, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Audas R., Barmby T., Treble J. Luck, effort, and reward in an organizational hierarchy. J. Labor Econom. (2004) 22(2):379–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateman T. S., Organ D. W. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26(4):587–595Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman E. On Mumbai's streets, cabbies fight to keep passengers uncomfortable. Wall Street Journal (2009) October 29). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125668745618111751.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Blount S., Larrick R. P. Framing the game: Examining frame choice in bargaining. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 81(1):43–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: Evidence from economic experiments. Science (2008) 320(5883):1605–1609Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J., Charness G. Do labour market conditions affect gift exchange? Some experimental evidence. Econom. J. (2004) 114(497):684–708Google Scholar
• Brosig J., Ockenfels A., Weimann J. The effect of communication media on cooperation. German Econom. Rev. (2002) 4(2):217–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bull C., Schotter A., Weigelt K. Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. (1987) 95(1):1–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnham T., McCabe K., Smith V. L. Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 43(1):57–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J., Matthews P. H., Schirm J. Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100(1):504–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G. Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market. J. Labor Econom. (2004) 22(3):665–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G., Kuhn P. Does pay inequality affect worker effort? Experimental evidence. J. Labor Econom. (2007) 25(4):693–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G., Levine D. I. Sabotage! Survey evidence on when it is acceptable. (2004) . Working paper, Center for Responsible Business, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
• Crawford V. P. A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk. J. Econom. Theory (1998) 78(2):286–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deckop J. R., Mangel R., Cirka C. C. Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(4):420–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drago R. W., Garvey G. T. Incentives for helping on the job. Theory and evidence. J. Labor Econom. (1998) 16(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg R. G., Bognanno M. L. The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA tour. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1990) 43(3):74–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson T. Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. J. Labor Econom. (1999) 17(2):262–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A., Fehr E. Why labour market experiments? Labour Econom. (2003) 10(4):399–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A., Fehr E., Huffman D. The power and limits of tournament incentives. (2008) . Discussion paper, University of Zurich, ZurichGoogle Scholar
• Fehr E., Falk A. Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete market. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107(1):106–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspectives (2000) 14(3):159–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Rockenbach B. Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature (2003) 422(6928):137–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Gächter S., Kirchsteiger G. Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence. Econometrica (1997) 64(4):833–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Kirchsteiger G., Riedl A. Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(2):437–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Kirchler E., Weichbold A., Gächter S. When social norms overpower competition: Gift exchange in experimental labor markets. J. Labor Econom. (1998) 16(2):324–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S., Kessler E., Königstein M. Performance incentives and the dynamics of voluntary cooperation. (2009) . Discussion paper, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
• Garicano L., Palacios-Huerta I. Sabotage in tournaments: Making the beautiful game a bit less beautiful. (2006) . Discussion paper, London School of Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Gneezy U., Rustichini A. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):791–810Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B., Kremer K., Macho V. An online recruiting system for economic experiments. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 (2004) (Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany) 79–93GWDG Bericht 63Google Scholar
• Grund C., Sliwka D. Envy and compassion in tournaments. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2005) 14(1):187–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haeussler C., Jiang L., Thusby J., Thursby M. C. Specific and general information sharing among academic scientists. (2009) . Working Paper 15315, Ludwig Maximilian University, München, GermanyCrossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C. The effect of communication in incentive systems—An experimental study. Managerial Decision Econom. (2006) 27(5):333–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C., Irlenbusch B. An experimental study on tournament design. Labour Econom. (2003) 10(4):443–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C., Irlenbusch B. Incentives in tournaments with endogenous prize selection. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (2005) 161(4):1–28Google Scholar
• Harbring C., Irlenbusch B. How many winners are good to have? On tournaments with sabotage. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2008) 65(3–4):682–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C., Irlenbusch B., Kräkel M., Selten R. Sabotage in corporate contests—An experimental analysis. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. (2007) 14(3):367–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman J., Ariely D. Effort for payment—A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. (2004) 15(11):787–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irlenbusch B., Ruchala G. K. Relative rewards within team-based compensation. Labour Econom. (2008) 15(2):141–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irlenbusch B., Sliwka D. Incentives, decision frames, and motivation crowding out—An experimental investigation. (2005a) . Discussion Paper 1758, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Irlenbusch B., Sliwka D. Transparency and reciprocal behavior in employment relations. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2005b) 56(3):383–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoeber C. R., Thurman W. N. Testing the theory of tournaments: An empirical analysis of broiler production. J. Labor Econom. (1994) 12(2):155–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E. P. Pay equality and industrial politics. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97(3):561–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E. P. Personnel economics: Past lessons and future directions—Presidential address to the Society of Labor Economists. J. Labor Econom. (1999) 17(2):199–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin I. P., Schneider S. L., Gaeth G. J. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1998) 76(2):149–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman V., Samuels S. M., Ross L. The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2004) 30(9):1175–1185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath G. J., Samuelson L.Repeated Games and Reputations—Long-Run Relationships (2006) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organ D. W.Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome (1988) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Orrison A., Schotter A., Weigelt K. Multiperson tournaments: An experimental examination. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):268–279Link, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I.The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Paine J. B., Bachrach D. G. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J. Management (2000) 26(3):513–563Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson C. D., Allison S. T. Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 58(1):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A., Weigelt K. Asymmetric tournaments, equal opportunity laws, and affirmative action: Some experimental results. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(2):511–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M., Strassmair C. Communication, cooperation and collusion in team tournaments—An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. (2009) 66(1):506–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szymanski S. The economic design of sporting contests. J. Econom. Literature (2003) 41(4):1137–1187Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk F., Sonnemans J., van Winden F. Incentive systems in a real effort experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2001) 45(2):187–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Cho C., Cohen W. M. View from the bench: Patents and material transfers. Science (2005) 309(5743):2002–2003Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J. M., Kopelman S., Messick D. M. A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2004) 8(3):281–307Crossref, Google Scholar