An Experimental Study of Information Revelation Policies in Sequential Auctions

References

• Adomavicius G., Gupta A., Sanyal P. Design and evaluation of feedback schemes for multiattribute procurement auctions. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2008) . Paper 32, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/32Google Scholar
• Anand K., Goyal M. Strategic information management under leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2009) 55(3):438–452Link, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J., Che Y.-K., Kim J. Asymmetric information about rivals' types in standard auctions: An experiment. Games Econom. Behav. (2007) 59(2):240–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Greenwald A., Kannan K. N., Krishnan R. Effects of information-revelation policies under market-structure uncertainty. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1234–1248Link, Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter O. How auctions work for wine and art. J. Econom. Perspect. (1989) 3(3):23–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter O., Genesove D. Testing for price anomalies in real estate auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82(2):501–505Google Scholar
• Bajari P. Comparing competition and collusion in procurement auctions: A numerical approach. Econom. Theory (2001) 18(1):187–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Dellarocas C., Rice S. Vertically differentiated simultaneous Vickrey auctions: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2010) 56(7):1074–1092Link, Google Scholar
• Branco F. The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(1):63–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brosig J., Reiß J. P. Entry decisions and bidding behavior in sequential first-price procurement auctions: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. (2007) 58(1):50–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Ho T.-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campo S., Guerre E., Perrigne I., Vuong Q. Semiparametric estimation of first-price auctions with risk-averse bidders. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2011) 78(1):112–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandrashekar T., Narahari Y., Rosa C., Kulkarni D., Tew J. D., Dayama P. Auction-based mechanisms for electronic procurement. IEEE Trans. Automation Sci. Engrg. (2007) 4(3):297–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Vulcano G. Effects of information disclosure under first- and second-price auctions in a supply chain setting. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(2):299–316Link, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M., Weizsacker G. Stated beliefs and play in normal-form games. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2008) 75(3):729–762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J., Smith V., Walker J. Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 1(1):61–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das Varma G. Bidding for a process innovation under alternative modes of competition. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21(1):15–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson R., MacKinnon J. Bootstrap tests: How many bootstraps? Econometric Rev. (2000) 19(1):55–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Silva D., Dunne T., Kankanamge A., Kosmopoulou G. The impact of public information on bidding in highway procurement auctions. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2008) 52(1):150–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding W., Jeitschko T., Wolfstetter E. Signal jamming in a sequential auction. Econom. Lett. (2010) 108(1):58–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donald S. G., Paarsch H. J., Robert J. An empirical model of the multi-unit, sequential clock auction. J. Appl. Econometrics (2006) 21(8):1221–1247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. Price competition and market concentration: An experimental study. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2000) 18(1):7–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. Information disclosure in auctions: An experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 48(4):431–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B.The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans (1982) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B., Tibsharani J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman and Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W., Keskinocak P. Technology for transportation bidding at the Home Depot. (2000) . Teaching case, http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/people/faculty/Pinar_Keskinocak/home-depot-case.zipGoogle Scholar
• Englebrecht-Wiggans R. Sequential auctions of stochastically equivalent objects. Econom. Lett. (1994) 44(1):87–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):808–819Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(2):171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K. Bidding for the future: Signaling in auctions with an aftermarket. J. Econom. Theory (2003) 108(2):345–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Holt C. A., Ledyard J. O. An experimental comparison of the FCC's combinatorial and noncombinatorial simultaneous multiple round auctions. (2006) . Working paper, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Holt C. A., Palfrey T. R. Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(1):247–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gueth W., Ivanova-Stenzel R., Konigstein M., Strobel M. Learning to bid: An experimental study of bid function adjustments in auctions and fair division games. Econom. J. (2003) 113(487):477–494Google Scholar
• Harrison G. Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(4):749–762Google Scholar
• Hausch D. Multi-object auctions: Sequential vs. simultaneous sales. Management Sci. (1986) 32(12):1599–1610Link, Google Scholar
• Holt C., Laury S. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1644–1655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S., Normann H.-T., Oechssler J. Two are few and four are many: Number effects in experimental oligopolies. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2004) 53(4):435–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):96–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeitschko T. Learning in sequential auctions. Southern Econom. J. (1998) 65(1):98–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeitschko T., Wolfstetter E. Scale economies and the dynamics of recurring auctions. Econom. Inquiry (1998) 40(3):403–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel J., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kagel J., Levin D., Kagel J., Roth A. Auctions: A survey of experimental research, 1995–2008. Handbook of Experimental Economics (2010) 2(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kannan K. Effects of information revelation policies under cost uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) . ePub ahead of print June 14, http://isr.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/isre.1100.0292v1Google Scholar
• Katzman B., Rhodes-Krop M. The consequences of information revealed in auctions. Appl. Econom. Res. Bull. (2008) 2(1):53–87Google Scholar
• Klemperer P.Auctions: Theory and Practice (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna V.Auction Theory (2009) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Lambson V., Thurston N. Sequential auctions: Theory and evidence from the Seattle fur exchange. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(1):70–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica (1984) 52(6):1473–1518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Auction theory in private values. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(2):150–155Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Equilibrium in sealed high bid auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67(3):439–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matthews S. Comparing auctions for risk-averse buyers: A buyer's point of view. Econometrica (1987) 55(3):633–646Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., Weber R. J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan J., Steiglitz K., Reis G. The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. Contributions Econom. Anal. Policy (2003) 2(1). Article 5Google Scholar
• Neugebauer T., Pezanis-Christou P. Bidding behavior at sequential first-price auctions with(out) supply uncertainty: A laboratory analysis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(1):55–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyarko Y., Schotter A. An experimental study of belief learning using elicited beliefs. Econometrica (2002) 70(3):971–1005Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortega-Reichert A. Models for competitive bidding under uncertainty. (1968) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Romano J. A bootstrap revival of some nonparametric distance tests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1988) 83(403):698–708Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romano J. Bootstrap and randomization tests of some nonparametric hypotheses. Ann. Statist. (1989) 17(1):141–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R. Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule. Experiment. Econom. (1998) 1(19):43–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R., Buchta J., Budescu D., Erev E., Zwick R. Experimental sealed-bid first-price auctions with directly observed bid functions. Advances in the Economics of Information Systems (1999) (Lawrenz Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 79–102Google Scholar
• Sheremeta R. Experimental comparison of multi-stage and one-stage contests. Games Econom. Behav. (2010) 68(2):731–747Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Market structure and the flow of information in repeated auctions. (1996) . Working paper, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Thomas C. Information revelation and buyer profits in repeated procurement competition. J. Indust. Econom. (2010) 58(1):79–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tu Z. Why do we use Dutch auction to sell flowers? Information disclosure in sequential auctions. (2005) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Wakker P. Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility function. Health Econom. (2008) 17(12):1329–1344Crossref, Google Scholar