Capacity Investment Timing by Start-ups and Established Firms in New Markets

References

• Anand K., Girotra K. The strategic perils of delayed differentiation. Management Sci. (2007) 53(5):697–712Link, Google Scholar
• Anupindi R., Jiang L. Capacity investment under postponement strategies, market competition, and demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2008) 54(11):1876–1890Link, Google Scholar
• Archibald T. W., Thomas L. C., Betts J. M., Johnston R. B. Should start-up companies be cautious? Inventory policies which maximise survival probabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1161–1174Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V. Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Managment (2010) 12(4):583–607Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V., Burnetas A. N., Ritchken P. H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(1):123–146Link, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. L., Agarwal R. The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1887–1902Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran S., Ramachandran K. Competitive product introductions in technologically dynamic environments. (2007) . Working paper, Southern Methodist University, DallasCrossref, Google Scholar
• Boyabatli O., Toktay B. Stochastic capacity investment and technology choice in imperfect capital markets. (2007) . Working paper, Singapore Management University, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Brander J. A., Lewis T. R. Oligopoly and financial structure: The limited liability effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):956–970Google Scholar
• Brander J. A., Lewis T. R. Bankruptcy costs and the theory of oligopoly. Canadian J. Econom. (1988) 21(2):221–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R., Ghemawat P. Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1072–1084Link, Google Scholar
• Chod J., Lyandres E. Strategic IPOs and product market competition. J. Financial Econom. (2011) 100(1):45–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Bower J. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(3):197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Donder P., Roemer J. E. Mixed oligopoly equilibria when firms' objectives are endogenous. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2009) 27(3):414–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Fraja G., Delbono F. Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. J. Econom. Surveys (1990) 4(1):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Druehl C. T., Schmidt G. M. A strategy for opening a new market and encroaching on the lower end of the existing market. Production Oper. Management (2008) 17(1):44–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta P. K., Radner R. Profit maximization and the market selection hypothesis. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(4):769–798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E. First mover and second mover advantages. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1985) 26(3):649–653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald B., Stiglitz J. Asymmetric information and the new theory of the firm: Financial constraints and risk behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(2):160–165Google Scholar
• Hamilton J. H., Slutsky S. M. Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria. Games Econom. Behav. (1990) 2(1):29–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3(4):305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi Y. V., Reibstein D. J., Zhang Z. J. Optimal entry timing in markets with social influence. Management Sci. (2009) 55(6):926–939Link, Google Scholar
• Klastorin T., Tsai W. New product introduction: Timing, design, and pricing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(4):302–320Link, Google Scholar
• Lange D., Boivie S., Henderson A. D. The parenting paradox: How multibusiness diversifiers endorse disruptive technologies while their corporate children struggle. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52(1):179–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G. L., Yoon E. The timing of competitive market entry: An exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Sci. (1990) 36(5):568–585Link, Google Scholar
• Maggi G. Endogenous leadership in a new market. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(4):641–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R., Shepp L. Risk vs. profit potential: A model for corporate strategy. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1996) 20(8):1373–1393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saloner G. Cournot duopoly with two production periods. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 42(1):183–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt G. M., Druehl C. T. When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? J. Product Innovation Management (2008) 25(4):347–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8(2):534–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swinney R., Netessine S. Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(1):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Tanrisever F., Erzurumlu S., Joglekar N. Production, process investment and the survival of debt financed startup firms. (2009) . Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, AustinCrossref, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem J. Capacity management, investment, and hedging: Review and recent developments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(3):269–302Link, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem J. A., Dada M. Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1631–1649Link, Google Scholar
• Walls M., Dyer J. Risk propensity and firm performance: A study of the petroleum exploration industry. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):1004–1021Link, Google Scholar