Contract Complexity and Performance Under Asymmetric Demand Information: An Experimental Evaluation
Published Online:1 Apr 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1318
References
- Adesso Solutions A double-edged sword. Bus. Credit (2005) 107(9):56–59Google Scholar
- Quantity discounts under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):777–792Link, Google Scholar
- Retirement savings and decision errors: Lessons from behavioral economics. FRBSF Econom. Lett. (2008) June 6):1–3Google Scholar
- A classification of literature on determining the lot size under quantity discounts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 92(2):219–238Crossref, Google Scholar
- Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):519–538Link, Google Scholar
- Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):590–608Link, Google Scholar
- Quantity discounts in single period supply contracts with asymmetric demand information. IIE Trans. (2007) 39(5):465–480Crossref, Google Scholar
- Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
- Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874Crossref, Google Scholar
- Coordination mechanism for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):693–708Link, Google Scholar
- A note on optimal procurement contracts with limited direct cost inflation. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 137(1):745–753Crossref, Google Scholar
- A supplier's optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):444–500Link, Google Scholar
- Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1303–1314Link, Google Scholar
- Rational choice under an imperfect ability to choose. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(3):419–440Google Scholar
- Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency. J. Environ. Econom. Management (2002) 44(1):123–143Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regression Analysis (2006) 2nd ed.(Academic Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
- The origin of predictable behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(4):560–595Google Scholar
- Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):686–700Link, Google Scholar
- Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. (1992) 24(1):1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
- Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328Crossref, Google Scholar
- Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272Link, Google Scholar
- Technical note: Robust newsvendor competition under asymmetric information. Oper. Res. (2011) 59(1):254–261Link, Google Scholar
- Single-period inventory models with demand uncertainty and quantity discounts: Behavioral implications and a new solution procedure. Naval Res. Logistics (1985) 32(4):537–550Crossref, Google Scholar
- Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):1953–1968Link, Google Scholar
- Experimental investigation of retailer-supplier contracts: The whole-sale price contract. (2004) . Working paper, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
- The Theory of Incentives: The Principal Agent Theory (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
- Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):312–326Link, Google Scholar
- Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10(1):6–38Crossref, Google Scholar
- McKinsey Global Survey Flaws in strategic decision making. McKinsey Quart. (2009) January):1–6Google Scholar
- Theories and realities of quantity discounts: An exploratory study. Production Oper. Management (1998) 7(4):352–369Crossref, Google Scholar
- Supplier and retailer behavior and the effectiveness of coordinating contracts. (2008) . Working paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
- Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Hidden flaws in strategy. McKinsey Quart. (2003) May):26–39Google Scholar
- Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 1(1):7–59Crossref, Google Scholar
- The dumbest marketing ploy. Fortune (1992) 126(7):88–92Google Scholar
- Behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69(1):99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Lindbeck A. Rational decision-making in business organizations. Nobel Lectures, Economics 1969-1980 (1978) (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore) 343–371Google Scholar
- Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):566–589Link, Google Scholar
- Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1509–1522Link, Google Scholar
- Nonlinear Pricing (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1973) 3(1):28–44Crossref, Google Scholar

