Mandatory Fair Value Accounting and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the European Real Estate Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1339

References

  • Armstrong C., Barth M., Jagolinzer A., Riedl E. Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. Accounting Rev. (2010) 85(1):31–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball R. Making accounting more international, how, and how far will it go? J. Appl. Corporate Finance (1995) 8(3):19–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball R. International financial reporting standards: Pros and cons for investors. Accounting Bus. Res. (2006) 36(Special issue: International Accounting Policy Forum):5–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball R., Kothari S. P., Robin A. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. J. Accounting Econom. (2000) 29(1):1–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball R., Robin A., Wu J. Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. J. Accounting Econom. (2003) 36(1–3):235–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barth M., Clinch G. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market based value estimates. J. Accounting Res. (1998) 36(Supplement):199–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beuselinck C., Joos P., Van der Meulen S. International earnings comparability. (2007) . Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The NetherlandsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beuselinck C., Joos P., Khurana I. K., Van der Meulen S. Mandatory IFRS reporting and stock price informativeness. (2009) . Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The NetherlandsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beyer A., Cohen D., Lys T., Walther B. The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. J. Accounting Econom. (2010) 50(2–3):296–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgstahler D. C., Hail L., Leuz C. The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. Accounting Rev. (2006) 81(5):983–1016CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen H., Nikolaev V. Who uses fair-value accounting for non-financial assets after IFRS adoption? (2009) . Research Paper 09-12, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Cotter J., Richardson S. Reliability of asset revaluations: The impact of appraiser independence. Rev. Accounting Stud. (2002) 7(4):435–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danbolt J., Rees W. An experiment in fair value accounting: UK investment vehicles. Eur. Accounting Rev. (2008) 17(2):271–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daske H., Hail L., Leuz C., Verdi R. Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. J. Accounting Res. (2008) 46(5):1085–1142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daske H., Hail L., Leuz C., Verdi R. Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences of IFRS adoptions. (2009) . Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Dietrich D., Harris M., Muller K. The reliability of investment property fair value estimates. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 30(2):125–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easton P., Eddey P., Harris T. An investigation of revaluations of tangible long-lived assets. J. Accounting Res. (1993) 31(Supplement):1–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • European Public Real Estate Association Best practices policy recommendations (November). (2006) (European Public Real Estate Association, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Minutes to July 14, 2010 Board meeting: Investment properties. (2010) (Financial Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT) Google Scholar
  • Healy P. M., Palepu K. G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 31(1–3):405–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) International Accounting Standard 16, Property, Plant, and Equipment. (2003a) (International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation, London) Google Scholar
  • International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) International Accounting Standard 40, Investment Property. (2003b) (International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation, London) Google Scholar
  • Jermakowicz E., Gornik-Tomaszewski S. Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies. J. Internat. Accounting, Auditing, Taxation (2006) 15(2):170–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kibel P., Kozyr E.Key Ratios for Rating REITs and Other Commercial Property Firms (2007) (Moody's Investors Service, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lee C., Mucklow B., Ready M. Spreads, depths, and the impact of earnings information: An intraday analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. (1993) 6(2):345–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leuz C., Verrecchia R. The economic consequences of increased disclosure. J. Accounting Res. (2000) 38(Supplement):91–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller K. An examination of the voluntary recognition of acquired brand names in the United Kingdom. J. Accounting Econom. (1999) 26(1–3):179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller K., Riedl E. External monitoring of property appraisal estimates and information asymmetry. J. Accounting Res. (2002) 40(3):865–881CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) (2008) NAREIT meeting with Financial Accounting Standards BoardJanuary 25, 2008(NAREIT, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Sellhorn T., Gornik-Tomaszewski S. Implications of the “IAS regulation” for research into the international differences in accounting systems. Accounting in Europe (2006) 3(1):187–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Standard and Poor's GRA commercial real estate indices. December 31, 2007. (2007) (Standard and Poor's, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stoll H. The pricing of security dealer services: An empirical study of NASDAQ stocks. J. Finance (1978) 33(4):1153–1172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts R. What has the invisible hand achieved? (2006) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  • Zeff S. A. Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. British Accounting Rev. (2007) 39(4):290–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.