Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications?

References

• Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Barrios C., Wakker P. Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory. J. Econometrics (2007a) 138(1):356–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H., L'Haridon O. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty (2008) 36(3):245–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H., Paraschiv C. Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. (2007b) 53(10):1659–1674Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Vossmann F., Weber M. Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1384–1399Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M., Baillon A., Placido L., Wakker P. The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(2):695–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A., Cabantous L. Combining imprecise or conflicting probability judgments: A choice-based study. (2009) . Working paper Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Birnbaum M. Violations of monotonicity and contextual effects in choice-based certainty equivalents. Psych. Sci. (1992) 3(3):310–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum M. Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: An experimental dissection. J. Math. Psych. (2004) 48(2):87–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum M. Evidence against prospect theories in gambles with positive, negative, and mixed consequences. J. Econom. Psych. (2006) 27(6):737–761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1485–1496Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Abellan-Perpinan J. M., Pinto J. L., Mendez-Martinez I. Resolving inconsistencies in utility measurment under risk: Tests of generalizations of expected utility. Management Sci. (2007) 53(3):469–482Link, Google Scholar
• Booij A. S., van de Kuilen G. A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. J. Econom. Psych. (2009) 30(4):651–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booij A. S., van Praag B. M. S., van de Kuilen G. A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population. Theory Decision (2010) 68(1–2):145–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75(4):643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I., Golzman I., Hertwig R. What impacts the impact of rare events. J. Risk Uncertainty (2008) 36(2):153–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I., Ert E., Roth A., Haruvy E., Herzog S., Hau R., Hertwig R., Stewart T., West R., Lebiere C. A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. J. Behav. Decision Making (2010) 23(1):15–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etchart-Vincent N. Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. J. Risk Uncertainty (2004) 28(3):217–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C., Hadar L. “Decisions from experience” = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgment Decision Making (2006) 1(2):159–161Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Poldrack R. A., Glimcher P., Fehr E., Camerer C., Poldrack R. Prospect theory and the brain. Handbook of Neuroeconomics (2008) (Academic Press, San Diego) 145–173Google Scholar
• Fox C., Tversky A. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(3):585–603Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C., Tversky A. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):879–895Link, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R., Wu G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38(1):129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadar L., Fox C. R. Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience. Judgment Decision Making (2009) 4(4):317–325Google Scholar
• Hau R., Pleskac T. J., Hertwig R. Decisions from experience and statistical probabilities: Why they trigger different choices than a priori probabilities. J. Behav. Decision Making (2010) 23(1):48–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hau R., Pleskac T. J., Kiefer J., Hertwig R. The description-experience gap in risky choice: The influence of sample size and experienced probabilities. J. Behav. Decision Making (2008) 21(5):493–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R., Erev I. The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends Cognitive Sci. (2009) 13(12):517–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R., Barron G., Weber E. U., Erev I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psych. Sci. (2004) 15(8):534–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R., Barron G., Weber E. U., Erev I., Fiedler K., Juslin P. The role of information sampling in risky choice. Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 72–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jessup R. K., Bishara A. J., Busemeyer J. R. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice. Psych. Sci. (2008) 19(10):1015–1022Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilka M., Weber M. What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1712–1726Link, Google Scholar
• Köbberling V., Wakker P. An index of loss aversion. J. Econom. Theory (2005) 122(1):119–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lattimore P., Baker J., Witte A. The influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1992) 17(3):377–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCord M., de Neufville R. “Lottery equivalents”: Reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Management Sci. (1986) 32(1):56–60Link, Google Scholar
• Rakow T., Demes K., Newell B. Biased samples not mode of presentation: Reexamining the apparent underweighting of rare events in experience-based choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2008) 106(2):168–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica (1989) 57(3):571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U., Zank H. What is loss aversion? J. Risk Uncertainty (2005) 30(2):157–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Fox C. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102(2):269–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Wakker P. Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica (1995) 63(6):1255–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ungemach C., Chater N., Stewart N. Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)? Psych. Sci. (2009) 20(4):473–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. Testing and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle. Econometrica (2001) 69(4):1039–1059Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psych. Rev. (2004) 111(1):236–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P.Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity (2010) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P., Deneffe D. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1131–1150Link, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Shafir S., Blais A. R. Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psych. Rev. (2004) 111(2):430–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Gonzalez R. Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1676–1690Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Gonzalez R. Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1999) 45(1):74–85Link, Google Scholar
• Zank H. On probabilities and loss aversion. Theory Decision (2010) 68(3):243–261Crossref, Google Scholar