Systemic Risk: What Defaults Are Telling Us
Published Online:30 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1375
References
- Information contagion and bank herding. J. Money, Credit, Banking (2008) 40(1):215–231Crossref, Google Scholar
- Measuring systemic risk. (2010) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkCrossref, Google Scholar
- CoVaR. (2010) . Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Contagion effects of bank failures: Evidence from capital markets. J. Bus. (1983) 56(3):305–317Crossref, Google Scholar
- Additional evidence on the information-based contagion effects of bank failures. J. Banking Finance (1996) 20(1):57–69Crossref, Google Scholar
- A new risk indicator and stress testing tool: A multifactor nth-to-default CDS basket. (2006) . IMF Working Paper 06/105, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Exploring the sources of default clustering. (2010) . Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
- Evaluating value-at-risk models with desk-level data. Management Sci. (2009) . ePub ahead of print January 28, http://mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/mnsc.1080.0964v1Google Scholar
- The politics of bank failures: Evidence from emerging markets. Quart. J. Econom. (2005) 120(4):1413–1444Crossref, Google Scholar
- Too many to fail? Evidence of regulatory reluctance in bank failures when the banking sector is weak. Rev. Financial Stud. (2011) 24(4):1378–1405Crossref, Google Scholar
- Volatility, correlation and tails for systemic risk measurement. (2010) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- The END: A new indicator of financial and nonfinancial corporate sector vulnerability. (2005) . IMF Working Paper 05/231, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- On the relation between credit spread puzzles and the equity premium puzzle. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22(9):3367–3409Crossref, Google Scholar
- Evaluating interval forecasts. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1998) 39(4):842–862Crossref, Google Scholar
- Is hazard or probit more accurate in predicting bank failures? Evidence from U.S. bank failures. (2010) . Working paper, DePaul University, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- How large can jump-to-default risk premia be? Modeling contagion via the updating of beliefs. (2009) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- The 1985 Ohio thrift crisis, the FSLIC's solvency and rate contagion for retail CDs. J. Finance (1992) 47(3):919–941Crossref, Google Scholar
- Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated. J. Finance (2007) 62(1):93–117Crossref, Google Scholar
- Frailty correlated default. J. Finance (2009) 64(5):2089–2123Crossref, Google Scholar
- Multi-period corporate default prediction with stochastic covariates. J. Financial Econom. (2007) 83(3):635–665Crossref, Google Scholar
- CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2004) 22(4):367–381Crossref, Google Scholar
- The impact of jumps in volatility and return. J. Finance (2003) 58(3):1269–1300Crossref, Google Scholar
- The yield curve as a leading indicator: Some practical issues. Current Issues Econom. Finance (2006) 12(5):1–7Google Scholar
- Correlated default with incomplete information. J. Banking Finance (2004) 28(7):1521–1545Crossref, Google Scholar
- A top-down approach to multiname credit. Oper. Res. (2011) 59(2):283–300Link, Google Scholar
- Moody's senior ratings algorithm and estimated senior ratings. (2005) . Report, Moody's Investors Service. Last accessed June 24, 2011, http://www.moodys.com/researchandratings/Google Scholar
- A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions. J. Banking Finance (2009) 33(11):2036–2049Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):773–795Crossref, Google Scholar
- The multistage latent factor intensity model for credit rating transitions. J. Econometrics (2008) 142(1):399–424Crossref, Google Scholar
- Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. J. Derivatives (1995) 3(2):73–84Crossref, Google Scholar
- Correlation in corporate defaults: Contagion or conditional independence? J. Financial Intermediation (2010) 19(3):355–372Crossref, Google Scholar
- An application of the Cox proportional hazards model to bank failure. J. Banking Finance (1986) 10(4):511–531Crossref, Google Scholar
- Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach. J. Banking Finance (2005) 29(10):2577–2603Crossref, Google Scholar
- Generalized Linear Models (1989) (Chapman and Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
- High-yield bond default and call risks. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81(3):409–419Crossref, Google Scholar
- Démonstration simplifée d'un théorème de Knight. Séminaire de Probabilités V (1971) 191(Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 191–195Lecture Note in MathematicsCrossref, Google Scholar
- The asymptotic behaviour of maximum likelihood estimators of stationary point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (1978) 30(part A):243–261Crossref, Google Scholar
- Systemic risk. Georgetown Law J. (2008) 97(1):193–249Google Scholar
- Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. J. Bus. (2001) 74(1):101–124Crossref, Google Scholar
- A proportional hazards model of bank failure: An examination of its usefulness as an early warning model tool. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Econom. Rev. (1991) 1991(QI):21–31Google Scholar
- Why do banks disappear? The determinants of U.S. bank failures and acquisitions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2000) 82(1):127–138Crossref, Google Scholar

