Do Cultural Differences Between Contracting Parties Matter? Evidence from Syndicated Bank Loans

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1378

References

  • Adair W., Brett J., Okumura T. Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(3):371–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahern K., Daminelli D., Fracassi C. Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world. (2010) . Mimeo, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • Alesina A., Lotti F., Mistrulli P. E. Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. (2008) . NBER Working Paper 14202, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altman E., Suggitt H. Default rates in the syndicated bank loan market: A mortality analysis. J. Banking Finance (2000) 24(1–2):229–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bae K., Goyal V. Creditor rights, enforcement and bank loans. J. Finance (2009) 64(2):823–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G.The Economics of Discrimination (1971) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. The organization of firms across countries. (2009) . NBER Working Paper 15129, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bottazzi L., Da Rin M., Hellmann T. The importance of trust for investment: Evidence from venture capital. (2007) . Mimeo, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  • Bottazzi L., Da Rin M., Hellmann T. Who are the active investors? Evidence from venture capital. J. Financial Econom. (2008) 89(3):488–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brett J., Okumura T. Inter- and intracultural negotiation: U.S. and Japanese negotiators. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(5):495–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carey M., Nini G. Is the corporate loan market globally integrated? A pricing puzzle. J. Finance. (2007) 62(6):2969–3007CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coval J., Moskowitz T. Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance (1999) 54(6):2045–2073CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis S., Mullineaux D. Syndicated loans. J. Financial Intermediation (2000) 9(4):404–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djankov S., McLiesh C., Shleifer A. Private credit in 129 countries. J. Financial Econom. (2007) 84(2):299–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffie D., Garleanu N., Pedersen L. Over-the-counter markets. Econometrica (2005) 73(6):1815–1847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffie D., Garleanu N., Pedersen L. Valuation in over-the-counter markets. Rev. Financial Stud. (2007) 20(6):1865–1900CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emery K., Cantor R. Relative default rates on corporate loans and bonds. J. Banking Finance (2005) 29(6):1575–1584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esty B., Megginson W. Creditor rights, enforcement, and debt ownership structure: Evidence from the global syndicated loan market. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2003) 38(1):37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giannetti M., Yafeh Y. Do cultural differences between contracting parties matter? Evidence from syndicated bank loans. (2010) . Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1204202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grinblatt M., Keloharju M. How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance (2001) 56(3):1053–1073CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. Does culture affect economic outcomes. J. Econom. Perspect. (2006) 20(2):23–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (2009) 124(3):1095–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Huberman G. Familiarity breeds investment. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(3):659–680CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inglehart R.Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inglehart R., Baker W. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2000) 65(1):19–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inglehart R., Welzel C.Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kisgen D. Credit ratings and capital structure. J. Finance (2006) 61(3):1035–1072CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Singh H. The effects of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1988) 19(3):411–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mead R., Andrews T.International Management (2009) (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
  • Qian J., Strahan P. How law and institutions shape financial contracts: The case of bank loans. J. Finance (2007) 62(6):2803–2834CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravina E. Love & Loans. The effect of beauty and personal characteristics in credit markets. (2008) . Mimeo, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E., Bhowmik D. Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quart. (1970) 34(4):523–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose A. Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(1):98–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz S. A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociol. (2006) 5(2–3):137–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel J. I., Licht A. N., Schwartz S. H. Egalitarianism and international investment. J. Financial Econom. (2011) 102(3):621–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen M. How smart is smart money? A two-sided matching model of venture capital. J. Finance (2007) 62(6):2725–2762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber R. A., Camerer C. F. Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):400–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber Y., Shenkar O., Raveh A. National and corporate cultural fit in merger/acquisitions: An exploratory study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1215–1227LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.