Tournaments Without Prizes: Evidence from Personnel Records

References

• Anderson R., Manoogian S., Reznick S. The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1976) 34(5):915–992Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G., Iriberri N. The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J. Public Econom. (2010) 94(7–8):435–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O., Barankay I., Rasul I. Team incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. (2009) . Working paper, London School of Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Bandura A., Cervone D. Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 45(5):1017–1028Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy and task performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1988) 73(2):199–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buunk A., Gibbons F. Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 102(1):3–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce P., Martínez-Jerez F. A. Relative performance compensation, contests, and dynamic incentives. Management Sci. (2009) 55(8):1306–1320Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G., Kuhn P. Does pay inequality affect worker effort? Experimental evidence. J. Labor Econom. (2007) 25(4):693–725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark A., Frijters P., Shields M. Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J. Econom. Literature (2008) 46(1):95–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark A., Masclet D., Villeval M. Effort and comparison income: Experimental and survey evidence. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2010) 63(3):407–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E. Effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1972) 8(2):217–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E.Intrinsic Motivation (1975) (Plenum Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E., Koestner R., Ryan R. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(6):627–668Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J., Dur R., Sol J., Verbeke W. Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. (2009) . Working paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson T. Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical test on danish data. J. Labor Econom. (1999) 17(2):262–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson T., Poulsen A., Villeval M. C. Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence. Labour Econom. (2009) 16(6):679–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertac S. Social comparisons and optimal revelation: Theory and experiments. (2006) . Working paper, Koç University, Istanbul, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
• Etzioni A.Modern Organizations (1971) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Falk A., Ichino A. Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. (2006) 24(1):39–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(2):159–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Schmidt K. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):769–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C., Hvide H., Weiss Y. Cultural diversity, status concerns and the organization of work. Res. Labour Econom. (2005) 24(1):3–38Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 1(7):117–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank R. Are workers paid their marginal products? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(4):549–571Google Scholar
• Frank R.Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status (1985) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Kluger A., DeNisi A. The effects of information interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary information intervention theory. Psych. Bull. (1996) 119(2):254–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoeber C., Thurman W. Testing the theory of tournaments: An empirical analysis of broiler production. J. Labor Econom. (1994) 12(2):155–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohn A.Punished by Rewards (1993) (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Kuhnen C., Tymula A. Feedback, self-esteem and performance in organizations. (2010) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Latham G., Wexley K.Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal (1981) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lavy V. Gender differences in market competitiveness in a real workplace: Evidence from performance-based pay tournaments among teachers. (2008) . NBER Working Paper 14338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lazear E. Pay equality and industrial politics. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97(3):561–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(5):841–864Crossref, Google Scholar
• London M.Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ) Google Scholar
• Luttmer E. Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quart. J. Econom. (2005) 120(3):963–1002Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B., Sela A., Shi X. Contests for Status. J. Political Econom. (2007) 115(2):338–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D., Klein W. Use of absolute and comparative performance feedback in absolute and comparative judgments and decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2008) 107(1):60–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D. The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1979) 23(3):309–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oswald A. Happiness and economic performance. Econom. J. (1997) 107(6):1815–1831Google Scholar
• Sunde U., Dohmen T., Falk A., Weber B., Fliessbach K. Relative versus absolute income, joy of winning, and gender: Brain imaging evidence. J. Public Econom. (2011) 95(3):279–285Google Scholar
• Tran A., Zeckhauser R. Rank as an incentive. (2009) . Working paper, Indiana University, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar