Managing Delegated Search Over Design Spaces

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1418

References

  • Anderson E., Davis-Blake A., Erzurumlu S., Joglekar N., Parker G., Loch C., Kavadias S. The effects of outsourcing, offshoring, and distributed product development organizations on coordinating the NPD process. Handbook on New Product Development (2008) (Elsevier, Boston) 165–197Google Scholar
  • Auer P., Cesa-Bianchi N., Fischer P. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Mach. Learn. (2002) 47(2–3):235–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron K. S. Effectiveness as a paradox: Consensus and conflicts in conceptations of organizational effectiveness. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):539–553LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y.-K., Gale I. Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):646–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahan E., Mendelson H. An extreme value model of concept testing. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):102–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eppinger S. D., Chitkara A. R. The new practice of global product development. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47:22–30Google Scholar
  • Erat S., Kavadias S. Sequential testing of product designs: Implications for learning. Management Sci. (2008) 54(5):956–968LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gaba A., Kalra A. Risk behavior in response to quotas and contests. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):417–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. (2010) 56(4):591–605LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huston L., Sakkab N. Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(3):58–66Google Scholar
  • Kauffman S., Levin S. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theoret. Biol. (1987) 128(1):11–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kornish L., Ulrich K. Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. (2011) 57(1):107–128LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K., Lars Bo Jeppesen P. A. L., Panetta J. A. The value of openness in scientific problem solving. (2007) . Working Paper 07-050, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K. R., Kanji Z. Threadless: The business of community. (2010) . HBS Case 608-707, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mihm J., Loch C. H., Huchzermeier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):733–750LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Minsky M. Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proc. Inst. Radio Engineers (1961) 49(1):8–29Google Scholar
  • Moldovanu B., Sela A. The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):542–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moldovanu B., Sela A. Contest architecture. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 126(1):70–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) 1st ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Skipso The Rwanda Rural Electrification Challenge. (2009) . Accessed August 25, 2011, http://skipso.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/the-rwanda-rural-electrification-challengeGoogle Scholar
  • Smith G. F. Towards a heuristic theory of problem structuring. Management Sci. (1988) 34(12):1489–1506LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sommer S. C., Loch C. H. Selectionism and learning in project with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1334–1347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staples America wants the SpindleRack! Staples® Invention Quest™ unveils the next great office product. (2005) . Accessed August 25, 2011, http://multivu.prnewswire.com/mnr/staples/22668/Google Scholar
  • Szymanskia S., Valletti T. M. Incentive effects of second prizes. Eur. J. Political Econom. (2005) 21(2):467–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C. R. Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(4):872–890Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Collaborative prototyping and the pricing of custom-designed products. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):145–158LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Ulrich K.Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (2009) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1529–1543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toubia O. Idea generation, creativity, and incentives. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):411–425LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. L. Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica (1979) 47(3):641–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. L. Efficient incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. (1980) 94(4):719–730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.