Initial Public Offerings as Lotteries: Skewness Preference and First-Day Returns
Published Online:14 Oct 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1431
References
- Allocation of initial public offerings and flipping activity. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 68(1):111–135Crossref, Google Scholar
- Investor sentiment in the stock market. J. Econom. Perspect. (2007) 21(2):129–151Crossref, Google Scholar
- Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. J. Financial Econom. (2011) 99(2):427–446Crossref, Google Scholar
- Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(5):2066–2100Crossref, Google Scholar
- A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues. J. Finance (1982) 37(4):955–976Crossref, Google Scholar
- Earnings expectations, investor trade size, and anomalous returns around earnings announcements. J. Financial Econom. (2005) 77(2):289–319Crossref, Google Scholar
- Investment banking, reputation and underpricing of initial public offerings. J. Financial Econom. (1986) 15(1–2):213–232Crossref, Google Scholar
- A comparison of trade execution costs for NYSE and NASDAQ-listed stocks. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1997) 32(3):287–310Crossref, Google Scholar
- Expected idiosyncratic skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. (2010) 23(1):169–202Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal beliefs, asset prices, and the preference for skewed returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(2):159–165Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal expectations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(4):1092–1118Crossref, Google Scholar
- Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. J. Finance (1990) 45(4):1045–1067Crossref, Google Scholar
- Investor sentiment and pre-IPO markets. J. Finance (2006) 61(3):1187–1216Crossref, Google Scholar
- IPO pricing in hot market conditions: Who leaves money on the table? J. Finance (2005) 60(1):487–521Crossref, Google Scholar
- Does sentiment drive the retail demand for IPOs? J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2009) 44(1):85–108Crossref, Google Scholar
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. (1993) 33(1):3–56Crossref, Google Scholar
- Takeover defenses of IPO firms. J. Finance (2002) 57(5):1857–1889Crossref, Google Scholar
- Institutional versus individual investment in IPOs: The importance of firm fundamentals. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2009) 44(3):489–516Crossref, Google Scholar
- What makes investors trade? J. Finance (2001) 56(2):589–616Crossref, Google Scholar
- Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J. Finance (2000) 55(3):1263–1295Crossref, Google Scholar
- Markov chain marginal bootstrap. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2002) 97(459):783–795Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
- The next Microsoft? Skewness, idiosyncratic volatility, and expected returns. (2006) . Working paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillCrossref, Google Scholar
- Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. J. Finance (1976) 31(4):1085–1100Google Scholar
- Institutional skewness preferences and the idiosyncratic skewness premium. (2005) . Working paper, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, INGoogle Scholar
- Who gambles in the stock market? J. Finance (2009) 64(4):1889–1933Crossref, Google Scholar
- Religious beliefs, gambling attitudes, and financial market outcomes. J. Financial Econom. (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Earnings news and small traders: An intraday analysis. J. Accounting Econom. (1992) 15(2–3):265–302Crossref, Google Scholar
- Inferring trade direction from intraday data. J. Finance (1991) 46(2):733–746Crossref, Google Scholar
- Hot markets, investor sentiment, and IPO pricing. J. Bus. (2006) 79(4):1667–1702Crossref, Google Scholar
- Uniformly least powerful tests of market efficiency. J. Financial Econom. (2000) 55(3):361–389Crossref, Google Scholar
- Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management (2004) 33(3):5–37Google Scholar
- Is the IPO pricing process efficient? J. Financial Econom. (2004) 71(1):3–26Crossref, Google Scholar
- Litigation risk and IPO underpricing. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 65(3):309–336Crossref, Google Scholar
- The variability of IPO initial returns. J. Finance (2010) 65(2):425–465Crossref, Google Scholar
- Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. (2007) 20(4):1255–1288Crossref, Google Scholar
- A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica (1987) 55(3):703–708Crossref, Google Scholar
- Dotcom mania: The rise and fall of Internet stock prices. J. Finance (2003) 58(3):1113–1137Crossref, Google Scholar
- Are IPOs really underpriced? Rev. Financial Stud. (2004) 17(3):811–848Crossref, Google Scholar
- The long-run performance of initial public offerings. J. Finance (1991) 46(1):3–27Crossref, Google Scholar
- A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. J. Finance (2002) 57(4):1795–1828Crossref, Google Scholar
- Why new issues are underpriced. J. Financial Econom. (1986) 15(1–2):187–212Crossref, Google Scholar
- Anatomy of the IPOs of common stock. J. Finance (1988) 43(4):789–822Crossref, Google Scholar
- Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
- Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
- A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica (1980) 48(4):817–838Crossref, Google Scholar
- Individual skewness and the cross-section of average stock returns. (2006) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar

