Managing an Available-to-Promise Assembly System with Dynamic Short-Term Pseudo-Order Forecast

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1442

References

  • Akçay Y., Balakrishnan A., Xu S. H. Dynamic assignment of flexible service resources. Production Oper. Management (2010) 19(3):279–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aviv Y. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1326–1343LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker K. R., Bertrand J. W. M. An investigation of due-date assignment rules with constrained tightness. J. Oper. Management (1981) 1(3):109–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan A., Geunes J. Requirements planning with substitutions: Exploiting bill-of-materials flexibility in production planning. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(2):166–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Chen C.-Y., Zhao Z.-Y., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S. D., Shen Z.-J. Available to promise. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (2004) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) . Chap. 11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjaafar S., ElHafsi M. Production and inventory control of a single product assemble-to-order system with multiple customer classes. Management Sci. (2006) 52(12):1896–1912LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C. Y., Zhao Z. Y., Ball M. O. An available-to-promise model for periodical order promising of a non-perishable resource. (2008) . Working paper, George Mason University, Fairfax, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Song J.-S. Optimal policies for multiechelon inventory problems with Markov-modulated demand. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(2):226–234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeCroix G. A., Mookerjee V. S. Purchasing demand information in a stochastic-demand inventory system. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 102(1):36–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Kok T. G. Capacity allocation and outsourcing in a process industry. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2000) 68(3):229–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duenyas I., Hopp W. J., Bassok Y. Production quotas as bounds on interplant JIT contracts. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1372–1386LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duran S., Liu T., Simchi-Levi D., Swann J. Optimal production and inventory policies of priority and price-differentiated customers. IIE Trans. (2007) 39(9):845–861CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duran S., Liu T., Simchi-Levi D., Swann J. L. Policies utilizing tactical inventory for service-differentiated customers. Oper. Res. Lett. (2008) 36(2):259–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ervolina T., Dietrich B. Moving toward dynamic available to promise. (2001) . Working paper. IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Frank K. C., Zhang R. Q., Duenyas I. Optimal policies for inventory systems with priority demand classes. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(6):993–1002LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G., Özer Ö. Integrating replenishment decisions with advance demand information. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1344–1360LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gao L., Gorman M., Li Z. Optimal load acceptance polices for intermodal freight transportation. (2011) . Working paper. University of California, Riverside, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  • Gayon J. P., Benjaafar S., de V'ericourt F. Using imperfect advance demand information in production-inventory systems with multiple customer classes. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(1):128–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P., Yao D. D.Monotone Structure in Discrete-Event Systems (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gupta D., Wang L. Capacity management for contract manufacturing. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(2):367–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Y. Inventory rationing in a make-to-stock production system with several demand classes and lost sales. Management Sci. (1997) 43(8):1093–1103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heath D., Jackson P. Modeling the evolution of demand forecast with application to safety stock analysis in production/distribution systems. IIE Trans. (1994) 26(3):17–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W. J., Sturgis M. R. A simple, robust leadtime-quoting policy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):321–336LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kempf K. G. Control-oriented approaches to supply chain management in semiconductor manufacturing. Proc. 2004 Amer. Control Conf. (2004) BostonCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilger C., Schneeweiss L., Stadtler H., Kilger C. Demand fulfillment and ATP. Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning: Concepts, Models, Software and Case Studies (2000) (Springer, Berlin) 179–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li K. J., Fong D. K. H., Xu S. H. Managing trade-in programs based on product characteristics and customer heterogeneity in business-to-business markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2011) 13(1):108–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z., Gao L. The effects of sharing upstream information on product rollover. Production Oper. Management (2008) 17(5):522–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milner J. M., Kouvelis P. Order quantity and timing flexibility in supply chains: The role of demand characteristics. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):970–985LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moses S., Grant H., Gruenwald L., Pulat S. Real-time due-date promising by build-to-order environments. Internat. J. Production Res. (2004) 42(20):4353–4375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö. Replenishment strategies for distribution systems under advance demand information. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):255–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö., Wei W. Inventory control with limited capacity and advance demand information. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(6):988–1000LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson A. G., Carlson R. C. Dynamic order promising: real-time ATP. Internat. J. Integrated Supply Management (2007) 3(3):283–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romeijn H. E., Geunes J., Taaffe K. On a nonseparable convex maximization problem with continuous knapsack constraints. Oper. Res. Lett. (2007) 35(2):172–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi S. P., Cheng F. Optimality of (s, S) policies in inventory models with Markovian demand. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(6):931–939LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song J.-S., Zipkin P. Inventory control in a fluctuating demand environment. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(2):351–370LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taaffe K., Geunes J., Romeijn H. E. Target market selection and marketing effort under uncertainty: The selective newsvendor. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2008) 189(3):987–1003CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talluri K. T., Van Ryzin G.The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2005) (Springer Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan T., Gullu R., Erkip N. Modelling imperfect advance demand information and analysis of optimal inventory policies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 127(2):897–923CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Plenert G. Finite capacity promising. Production Inventory Management (1999) 40(3):50–56Google Scholar
  • Thas O., Rayner J. C. W. Smooth tests for the zero-inflated Poisson distribution. Biometrics (2005) 61(3):808–815CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topkis D. M.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu S. H., Gao L., Ou J. Service performance analysis and improvement for a ticket queue with balking customers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):971–990LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang J., Qin Z. Capacitated production control with virtual lateral transshipments. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(6):1104–1119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang J., Qi X., Xia Y. A production-inventory system with Markovian capacity and outsourcing option. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(2):328–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao H., Deshpande V., Ryan J. K. Inventory sharing and rationing in decentralized dealer networks. Management Sci. (2005) 51(4):531–547LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao H., Ryan J. K., Deshpande V. Optimal dynamic production and inventory transshipment policies for a two-location make-to-stock system. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(2):400–410LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.