The Extroverted Firm: How External Information Practices Affect Innovation and Productivity

References

• Applegate L., Cash J., Mills D. Information technology and tomorrow's manager. Harvard Business Rev. (1988) 66(6):128–136Google Scholar
• Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Wu L. Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, and information technology. Management Sci. (2012) 58(5):913–931Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Gambardella A. Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 38(4):361–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S., Stern S. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. (1998) . NBER Working Paper W6600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P., Rule J. Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Comm. ACM. (1984) 27(12):1184–1192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel A., Lichtenberg P. R. The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1987) 69(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel A., Ichniowski C., Shaw K. How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(4):1721–1758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj S., Bharadwaj A., Bendoly E. The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(4):437–453Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2012) 102(1):167–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley S. P., Nolan R.Sense and Respond: Capturing Value in the Network Era (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Greenstein S. Technological progress and co-invention in computing and in the uses of computers. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1996) 1–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3(4):183–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):23–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Mendelson H. Information systems and the organization of modern enterprise. J. Organ. Comput. (1993) 3(4):245–255Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Milgrom P. Complementarities in organizations. (2009) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Yang S., Zelkowitz M. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in Computers (1996) 43(Academic Press, San Diego) 179–214Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M., Yang S. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (2002) 1:137–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caroli E., Van Reenen J. Skill-biased organizational change: Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 116(4):1449–1492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):68–82Link, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P., Ramirez R., Kraemer K., Melville N. Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(2):392–408Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Davenport T., Harris J.Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning (2007) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• David P. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(2):355–361Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Kraemer K. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Min C. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm-level analysis. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1660–1675Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. D., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):345–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. D., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z., Hausman J. A. Errors in variables in panel data. J. Econometrics (1986) 31(1):93–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Information technology and internal firm organization: An exploratory analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 14(2):81–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Kochan T., Levine D., Olson C., Strauss G. What works at work: Overview and assessment. Indust. Relations (1996) 35(3):299–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B., Kohli A. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57(3):53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli A., Jaworksi B. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Marketing (1990) 54(2):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli A., Jaworski B., Kumar A. MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(4):467–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loveman G. Diamonds in the data mine. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(5):109–113Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of it business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):513–529Link, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Pillai R. Information age organizations, dynamics and performance. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1999) 38(3):253–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
• Murnane R., Levy F., Autor D. Upstairs, downstairs: Computers and skills on two floors of a large bank. Indust. Relations Labor Rev. (1999) 55(3):432–447Google Scholar
• Narver J., Slater S. The effect of market orientation on business profitability. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):311–332Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P., El Sawy O. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Powell W., Koput K., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R. Hierarchy: The economics of managing. J. Econom. Literature (1992) 30(3):1382–1415Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1996) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365Link, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K. J. Reassessing the impact of IT in the production function: A meta-analysis and sensitivity tests. Ann. Econom. Statist. (2005) 79–80):529–561Google Scholar
• Tambe P., Hitt L. M. The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Stystems. Res. (2012) . ePub ahead of print March 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0398Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P., Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Online supplement to “The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity”. (2011) . http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304775Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Krishnan V. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Woerner S. Networked at Cisco. (2001) . Teaching Case #1, Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar