White Lies

References

• Bentham J.An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789) . Reprint, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1907Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bok S.Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life (1978) (Pantheon Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Boles T. L., Croson R. T. A., Murnighan J. K. Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 83(2):235–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J., Charness G. Truth or consequences: An experiment. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):116–130Link, Google Scholar
• Cai H., Wang J. Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 56(1):7–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G., Dufwenberg M. Promises and partnership. Econometrica (2006) 74(6):1579–1601Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G., Rabin M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(3):817–869Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compte O., Postlewaite A. Confidence-enhanced performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(5):1536–1557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs Placebo use in clinical practice. (2006) . CEJA Report 2-I-06. Accessed October 22, 2011, http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/369/ceja_recs_2i06.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Crawford V. Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and boundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(1):133–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford V., Sobel J. Strategic information transmission. Econometrica (1982) 50(6):1431–1451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature (2009) 47(2):448–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Boles T., Murnighan J. K. Cheap talk in bargaining experiments: Lying and threats in ultimatum games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2003) 51(2):143–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• DePaulo B. M., Kashy D. A., Kirkendol S. E., Wyer M. M., Epstein J. A. Lying in everyday life. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. (1996) 70(5):979–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A., Johannesson M. Gender differences in deception. Econom. Lett. (2008) 99(1):197–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M., Battigalli P. Dynamic psychological games. J. Econom. Theory (2009) 144(1):1–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games Econom. Behav. (2000) 30(2):163–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C. C., Grossman P. J., Plott C., Smith V. Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results (2008) (Elsevier, New York) 509–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T., Johannesson M. Promises, threats, and fairness. Econom. J. (2004) 114(495):397–420Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T., Johannesson M., Lilja J., Zetterqvist H. Trust and truth. Econom. J. (2009) 119(534):252–276Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Schmidt K. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):817–868Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F., Ayal S., Mikulincer M., Shaver P. R. Honest rationales for dishonest behavior. The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil (2011) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Gino F., Pierce L. Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psych. Sci. (2009) 20(9):1153–1160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gintis H., Slingerland E., Collard M. Behavioral ethics. Integrating Science and the Humanities: Interdisciplinary Approaches (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Gneezy U. Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(1):384–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurkens S., Kartik N. Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion. Experiment. Econom. (2009) 12(2):180–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kant I.Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) . [Translated by T. K. Abbott. Pearson, London, 1949.]Google Scholar
• Kartik N. Strategic communication with lying costs. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2009) 76(4):1359–1395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundquist T., Ellingsen T., Gribbe E., Johannesson M. The aversion to lying. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2009) 70(1–2):81–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsushima H. Role of honesty in full implementation. J. Econom. Theory (2008) 139(1):353–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N., Ariely D. Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. J. Public Policy Marketing (2006) 25(1):117–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N., Amir O., Ariely D. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(6):633–644Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ottaviani M., Squintani F. Naive audience and communication bias. Internat. J. Game Theory (2006) 35(1):129–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saint Augustine. Enchiridion on Faith, Hope, and Love (421) . [Translated and published by Regnery Publishing, Washington, DC, 1996.]Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Pagés S., Vorsatz M. An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender–receiver game. Games Econom. Behav. (2007) 61(1):86–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherman R., Hickner J. Academic physicians use placebos in clinical practice and believe in the mind–body connection. J. General Internal Medicine (2008) 23(1):7–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M. Deception through telling the truth? Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. Econom. J. (2009) 119(534):47–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanberg C. Why do people keep their promise? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica (2008) 76(6):1467–1480Crossref, Google Scholar