Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal Linkages

References

• Agarwal R., Ganco M., Ziedonis R. H. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(13):1349–1374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J. Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1457–1471Link, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J., Gittelman M. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(4):774–779Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J., Gittelman M., Sampat B. Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy (2009) 38(2):415–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Appleyard M. M. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Special Issue):137–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Fosfuri A., Gambardella A.Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B., Feldman M. B. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
• Bergek A., Bruzelius M. Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB. Res. Policy (2010) 39(10):1321–1334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim B. D., Whinston M. Multimarket contact and collusive behavior. RAND J. Econom. (1990) 21(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R. R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1169–1184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung W., Alcácer J. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Sci. (2002) 48(12):1534–1554Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Stoneman P. Empirical studies of innovative activity. Handbook of the Economics of Innovations and Technological Change (1995) (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 182–264Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Delgado M., Porter M., Stern S. Clusters, convergence and economic performance. (2010) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonCrossref, Google Scholar
• Doz Y., Wilson K., Veldhoen S., Goldbrunner T., Altman G. Innovation: Is global the way forward? (2006) . Joint study by Booz Allen Hamilton and INSEADGoogle Scholar
• Dushnitsky G., Shaver J. M. Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(10):1045–1064Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edstrom A., Galbraith J. R. Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(2):248–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G., Glaeser E. L. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105(5):889–927Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A., Giarratana M. S., Luzzi A. The penguin has entered the building: The commercialization of open source software products. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(2):292–305Link, Google Scholar
• Frost T. S., Zhou C. R&D co-practice and “reverse” knowledge integration in multinational firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2005) 36(6):676–687Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frost T. S., Birkinshaw J., Ensign P. C. Centers of excellence in multinational firms. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(11):997–1018Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson R. J. The legal infrastructure of high technology districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York Univ. Law Rev. (1999) 74(3):575–629Google Scholar
• Gittelman M., Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citations patterns. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):366–382Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):473–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(1):16–38Google Scholar
• Hannah D. R. Should I keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees' obligations to protect trade secrets. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):71–84Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Firm-specificity in corporate applied R&D. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):173–184Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M.Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kamien M., Muller E., Zang I. Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82(5):1293–1306Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24(4):625–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri N. Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality. Acad. Management J. (2010) 53(5):1194–1209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanjouw J. O., Schankerman M. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econom. J. (2004) 114(495):441–465Google Scholar
• Liebeskind J. P. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):93–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A.Principles of Economics (1920) revised 8th ed.(MacMillan, London) Google Scholar
• Nobel R., Birkinshaw J. Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R&D operations. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):479–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley J., Sampson R. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):723–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Res. Policy (2006) 35(8):1122–1130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.On Competition (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Putnam J. The value of international patent rights. (1996) . Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Rajan R., Zingales L. The firm as a dedicated hierarchy: A theory of the origins and growth of firms. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(3):805–851Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Schrader S. Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Res. Policy (1991) 20(2):153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver J. M., Flyer F. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(12):1175–1193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy (2008) 37(1):77–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M. Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica (1984) 52(1):101–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• StataCorpStata 11 Base Reference Manual (2009) (Stata Press, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(8):791–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer Special Issue):21–38Google Scholar
• Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., Jaffe A. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1997) 5(1):19–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1185–1199Link, Google Scholar
• Ziedonis R. H. Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):804–820Link, Google Scholar