Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452

References

  • Adams R., Ferreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. (2009) 94(2):291–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams R., Licht A., Sagiv L. Shareholderism: Board members' values and the shareholder-stakeholder dilemma. Strategic Management J. (2011) 32(12):1331–1355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahern K., Dittmar A. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albrecht J., Bjorklund A., Vroman S. Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden? J. Labor Econom. (2003) 21(1):145–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Apesteguia J., Azmat G., Iriberri N. The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. (2012) 58(1):78–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M., Goldin C., Katz L. F. Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. (2010) 2(3):228–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branson D. M.No Seat at the Table: How Corporate Governance Keeps Women Out of America's Boardrooms (2006) (New York University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Croson R., Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature (2009) 47(2):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T., Falk A., Huffman D., Sunde U. Which representative agent? Heterogeneity, correlation, and determinants of risk, time, and social preferences. (2005) . Working paper, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T., Falk A., Huffman D., Sunde U. The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckel C. C., Grossmann P. J., Plott C. R., Smith V. L. Men, women, and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Results (2008) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1061–1073CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández R. Culture and economics. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2007) 5(2–3):305–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández R., Durlauf S. N., Blume L. E. Culture and economics. New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2012) 2nd ed.(Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK) Google Scholar
  • Gneezy U., Niederle M., Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(3):1049–1074CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham J. R., Harvey C. R. The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. J. Financial Econom. (2001) 60(2–3):187–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham J., Harvey C. R., Puri M. Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. (2010) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (2009) 124(4):1095–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitlin S., Piliavin J. A. Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2004) 30:359–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R. M., Karelaia N., Trujillo C. A. When should I quit? Gender differences in exiting competitions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huffington A. Would things be any different if women ran corporate America? (2003) . CommonDreams.org (May 14), http://commondreams.org/views03/0514-09.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Independent, The Maternity and paternity leave across the EU. (2010) October 20). http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/maternity-and-paternity-leave-across-the-eu-2112229.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Kirk M. E., Gwin B. W. A diverse corporate board is more important than ever. (2009) . Corporate board member, April 7, http://www.boardmember.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=3420Google Scholar
  • Knoppen D., Saris W. Evaluation of the portrait values questionnaire using SEM: A new ESS proposal. (2009) . Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  • Kristof N. Mistresses of the universe. The New York Times (2009) February 7). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/opinion/08kristof.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Lyness K., Judeisch M. Are women more likely to be hired or promoted into management positions? J. Vocational Behav. (1999) 54(1):158–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matsa D. A., Miller A. R. A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. (2010) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken F., Martins L. L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(2):402–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris N. Harriet Harman: “If only it had been Lehman Sisters”. The Independent (2009) August 4). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/harriet-harman-if-only-it-had-been-lehman-sisters-1766932.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M., Segal C., Vesterlund L. How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in the light of gender differences in competitiveness. (2008) . NBER Working Paper 13923, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rokeach M.The Nature of Human Values (1973) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sapienza P., Zingales L., Maestripieri D. Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2009) 106(36):15268–15273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagiv L., Sverdlik N., Schwarz N. To compete or to cooperate? Values' impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2011) 41(1):64–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz S. H., Zana M. P. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1992) (Academic Press, New York) 1–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz S. H., Littrell Romie F.Draft Users Manual: Proper Use of the Schwartz Value Survey. Version 14 (2009) (Centre for Cross Cultural Comparisons, Auckland, New Zealand) . http://www.crossculturalcentre.homestead.comGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz S. H., Rubel T. Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2005) 89(6):1010–1028CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel J. I., Licht A. N., Schwartz S. H. Egalitarianism, cultural distance, and FDI: A new approach. (2010) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston. http://ssrn.com/abstract=957306Google Scholar
  • Siegel J. I., Licht A. N., Schwartz S. H. Egalitarianism and international investment. J. Financial Econom. (2011) 102(3):621–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making a difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(6):662–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tabellini G. Institutions and culture. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2008) 6(2–3):255–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verplanken B., Holland R. W. Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 82(3):434–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.