Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy

References

• Anderson S., Ginsburgh V. Price discrimination via second-hand markets. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1994) 38(1):23–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A., Sarvary M., Van Wassenhove L. N. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Sci. (2008) 54(10):1731–1746Link, Google Scholar
• Benjamin D., Kormendi R. The interrelationship between the markets for new and used durable goods. J. Law Econom. (1974) 17(2):381–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berinato S. Good stuff cheap. CIO Magazine (2002) October 15). http://www.cio.com/archive/101502/cheap.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Cisco.com Cisco Hardware Inspection and Software Re-Licensing Program. (2011) . Accessed November 30, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/hw_sw_relicensing_program.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Consumer Business Review Big players emerge in fragmented brokerage market. (2005) . CBRonline.com (September 5), http://www.cbronline.com/news/big_players_emerge_in_fragmented_brokerage_marketGoogle Scholar
• Debo L. G., Toktay L. B., Van Wassenhove L. N. Market segmentation and production technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1193–1205Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Purohit D. Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11, Part 2):19–34Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Koenigsberg O., Purohit D. Strategic decentralization and channel coordination. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):5–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Koenigsberg O., Purohit D. A research note on the role of production lead time and demand uncertainty in marketing durable goods. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):150–158Link, Google Scholar
• Ferguson M., Toktay L. B. The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production Oper. Management (2006) 15(3):351–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrer G., Swaminathan J. Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):15–26Link, Google Scholar
• Guide V. D. R., Li J. The potential for cannibalization of new products sales by remanufactured products. Decision Sci. (2010) 41(3):547–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser W., Lund R. T. Remanufacturing: An American resource. (2003) . Presentation, Boston University, Boston. http://www.bu.edu/reman/RemanSlides.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Heese H. S., Cattani K., Ferrer G., Gilland W., Roth A. V. Competitive advantage through take-back of used products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 164(1):143–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I., Lizzeri A. Interfering with secondary markets. RAND J. Econom. (1999) 30(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandra A. Refurbished PCs: Sweet deals or lemons? PC World (2002) February 27). http://www.pcworld.com/article/81966/consumer_watch_refurbished_pcssweet_deals_or_lemons.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Levinthal D., Purohit D. Durable goods and product obsolescence. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(1):35–56Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. Durability, market structure, and new-used goods models. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(4):816–824Google Scholar
• Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):125–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marion J. Sun under fire—For fixing Solaris OS costs to reduce competition in used Sun market. (2004) . Association of Service and Computer Dealers International (ASCDI) (June 8), http://www.sparcproductdirectory.com/view56.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Miller H. L. On killing the market for used textbooks and the relationship between markets for new and secondhand goods. J. Political Econom. (1974) 82(3):612–619Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H. Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(3):239–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E. L., Wang Q. Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Sci. (2009) 55(3):333–347Link, Google Scholar
• Ray S., Boyacı T., Aras N. Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable, remanufacturable products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(3):208–228Link, Google Scholar
• Robb D. Hardware today: SMB server selection strategies. (2006) . ServerWatch.com (May 30), http://www.serverwatch.com/hreviews/article.php/3609876/Hardware-Today-SMB-Server-Selection-Strategies.htmGoogle Scholar
• Rust J. When is it optimal to kill off the market for used durable goods? Econometrica (1986) 54(1):65–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• SearchServerVirtualization.com Server selection for production-level virtualization environments. (2008) . White paper. Accessed December 1, http://whitepapers.businessweek.com/detail/RES/1214931304_125.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Song S. C., Chintagunta P. K. A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(4):371–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanian R., Subramanyam R. Key factors in the market for remanufactured products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2012) 14(2):315–326Link, Google Scholar
• Sun.com Sun fire 15K server performance. (2007) . Accessed October 4, http://www.sun.com/servers/highend/sunfire15k/performance.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Thierry M., Salomon M., Van Nunen J., Van Wassenhove L. N. Strategic issues in product recovery management. Calif. Management Rev. (1995) 37(2):114–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M. Durable goods pricing when quality matters. J. Bus. (1996) 69(4):489–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M. Eliminating the market for secondhand goods: An alternative explanation for leasing. J. Law Econom. (1997) 40(1):61–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldman M. Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspect. (2003) 17(1):131–154Crossref, Google Scholar