Rational Herding in Microloan Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459

References

  • Agrawal A., Catalini C., Goldfarb A. Friends, family, and the flat world: The geography of crowdfunding. (2011) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ai C., Norton E. C. Interation terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(1):123–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W., Jain S. Reference groups and product line decisions: An experimental investigation of limited editions and product proliferation. Management Sci (2010) 56(4):621–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson L. R., Holt C. A. Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(5):847–862Google Scholar
  • Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58(2):277–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee A. V. A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as information cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouman F. A. ROSCA: On the origin of the species. Savings Development (1995) 19(2):117–148Google Scholar
  • Cai H., Chen Y., Fang H. Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(3):864–882CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C., Ho T. H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):837–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Çelen B., Kariv S. Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(3):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Wang Q., Xie J. Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(2):238–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K. Endogeneity and heterogeneity in a probit demand model: Estimation using aggregate data. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(4):442–456LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K., Jain D. C., Vilcassim N. J. Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(4):417–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R., Shang J. The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions. Experiment. Econom. (2008) 11(3):221–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng Y., Liu P. Mortgage prepayment and default behavior with embedded forward contract risks in China's housing market. J. Real Estate Finance Econom. (2009) 38(3):214–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duarte J., Siegel S., Young L. A. Trust and credit. (2010) . Working paper, Rice University, HoustonCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elberse A., Eliashberg J. Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):329–354LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Everett C. Group membership, relationship banking and loan default risk: The case of online social lending. (2010) . Working paper, Purdue University, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
  • Farnham M., Schmidt L., Sevak P. House prices and marital stability. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(3):615–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman S., Jin G. Z. Do social networks solve information problems for peer-to-peer lending? (2008) . Evidence from Prosper.com. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • Golder P. N., Tellis G. J. Growing, growing, gone: Cascades, diffusion, and turning points in the product life cycle. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):207–218LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (2009) 7th ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hartmann W. R., Manchanda P., Nair H., Bothner M., Dodds P., Godes D., Hosanagar K., Tucker C. Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3):287–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzenstein M., Dholakia U. M., Andrews R. L. Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing (2011a) 25(1):27–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzenstein M., Sonenshein S., Dholakia U. M. Tell me a good story and I may lend you my money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. J. Marketing Res. (2011b) 48(Special Issue):S138–S149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang D., Ying Y., Strijnev A. Identifying social learning and network externalities in decision-making: Evidence from the movie industry. (2011) . Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer R., Khwaja A. I., Luttmer E. F. P., Shue K. Screening in alternative credit markets: Can individual lenders infer borrower credit-worthiness in peer-to-peer lending? (2009) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
  • Kuksov D., Villas-Boas J. M. Endogeneity and individual consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(6):702–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin M., Viswanathan S., Prabhala N. R. Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Social networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. (2011) . Working paper, University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  • Loten A. Peer-to-peer loans grow. Wall Street Journal (2011) June 17). http://online.wsj.com/Google Scholar
  • Malmendier U., Lee Y. H. The bidder's curse. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(2):749–787CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C. F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miklós-Thal J., Zhang J. Strategic demarketing. (2011) . Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P. R. Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12(2):380–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H., Manchanda P., Bhatia T. Asymmetric peer effects in physician prescription behavior. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):883–895CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nance-Nash S. Peering into the peer-to-peer lending boom. Daily Finance (2011) February 13). http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/02/13/peering-into-the-peer-to-peer-lending-boomGoogle Scholar
  • Pope D. G., Sydnor J. R. What's in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com. J. Human Resources (2011) 46(1):53–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravina E. Love & loans: The effect of beauty and personal characteristics in credit markets. (2008) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Rigbi O. The effects of usury laws: Evidence from the online loan market. (2011) . Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  • Salganik M. J., Dodds P. S., Watts D. J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science (2006) 311(5762):854–856CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U., Ariely D. When rational sellers face nonrational buyers: Evidence from herding on eBay. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1624–1637LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C., Zhang J. How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. (2011) 57(5):828–842LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vuong Q. H. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica (1989) 57(2):307–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M. Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. J. Econometrics (1999) 90(1):77–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Zhang J. The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):315–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu R., Dholakia U. M., Chen X., Algesheimer R. Does online community participation foster risky financial behavior? J. Marketing Res. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. W. Construction, concentration, and discontinuities in social valuations. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.