Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460

References

  • Aral S., Weill P. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):763–780LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Wu D. J. Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. Proc. 27th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2006) Milwaukee:1819–1839CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A. Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note. Econom. Lett. (1996) 50(1):51–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A., Gambardella A. Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 38(4):361–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S., Stern S. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarities in organizational design. (1998) . NBER Working Paper 66, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G.P. Incentive contracts and performance measurement. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(3):598–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G.P., Hubbard T.N. Contractibility and asset ownership: On-board computers and governance in U.S. trucking. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(4):1443–1479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Kemerer C. F. Performance evaluation metrics for information systems development: A principal-agent model. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(4):379–400LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel A. Human resource management and organizational performance: Evidence from retail banking. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2004) 57(2):181–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel A., Ichniowski C., Shaw K. How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(4):1721–1758CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black S. E., Lynch L. M. How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2001) 83(3):434–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N., Sadun R., Van Reenen J. Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2012) 102(1):167–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T., Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? J. Econometrics (1995) 65(1):83–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3(3):183–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2003) 85(4):793–808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Milgrom P., Gibbons R., Roberts J. Complementarities in organizations. Handbook of Organizational Economics. (2012) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M., Yang S. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (2002) 2002(1):137–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caroli E., Van Reenen J. Skill-biased organizational change: Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(4):1449–1492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Wu D. J., Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):71–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7:24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):972–91Google Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K. Beyond incentive pay: Insiders' estimates of the value of complementary human resource management practices. J. Econom. Perspect. (2003) 17(1):155–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
  • Kandel E., Lazear E. P. Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(4):801–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000a) 90(5):1346–1361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. The power of incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000b) 90(2):410–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A. Do you have too much IT? MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2004) 45(3):18–22Google Scholar
  • Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19(2–3):179–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):311–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(1):7–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P., Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. (2012) 58(5):843–859LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.