Consistency Judgments, Embeddedness, and Relationship Outcomes in Interorganizational Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1462

References

  • Amaral L., Uzzi B. Complex systems—A new paradigm for the integrative study of management, physical, and technological systems. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1033–1035LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Narus J. A. A model of the distributor's perspective of distributor-manufacturer working relationships. J. Marketing (1984) 48(4):62–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Narus J. A. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):42–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Oliver C. Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57(4):540–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Li S. X., Usher J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(4):766–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bochner S., Insko C. A. Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1966) 4(6):614–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bothner M. S. Competition and social influence: The diffusion of the sixth-generation processor in the global computer industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003) 108(6):1175–1210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung S., Singh H., Lee K. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Emerson R. M. Power, equity, and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43(5):721–739CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Anderson E., Stern L. W., El-Ansary A. I.Marketing Channels (2001) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cropper S., Ebers M., Huxham C., Ring P. S., Cropper S., Ebers M., Huxham C., Ring P. S. Introducing inter-organizational relations. The Oxford Handbook of Interorganizational Relations (2008) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutta S., Bergen M., John G. The governance of exclusive territories when dealers can bootleg. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):83–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer F. R., Oh S. A transaction cost perspective on vertical contractual structure and interchannel competitive strategies. J. Marketing (1988) 52(2):21–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer F. R., Welsh M. A. Environmental relationships of the internal political economy of marketing channels. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(4):397–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7(2):117–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Incentives between firms (and within). Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):2–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman P. S., Haisley E. Social comparison processes in an organizational context: New directions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 102(1):109–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M., Etzoni A., Lawrence R. The social construction of economic institutions. Socio-Economics: Towards a New Synthesis (1991) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 75–81Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(1):33–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J., Ashton-James C. E., Ashkanasy N. M. Social comparison processes in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 102(1):22–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R.Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations, and Other Relational Assets (2007) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52(1):32–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Lavie D., Singh H. The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(11):1213–1233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Sytch M., Tatarynowicz A. The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure. Organ. Sci. (2012) 23(2):449–471LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gundlach G. T., Cadotte E. R. Exchange interdependence and interfirm interaction: Research in a simulated channel setting. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(4):516–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hage J., Aiken M. Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(1):72–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(4):593–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., Wathne K. H., Rokkan A. Inter-firm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):425–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C. Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1958) 63:597–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Roberts P. W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(2):387–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J. Toward theories of persuasion and belief change. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. (1981) 40(2):260–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Anderson E. Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Management Sci. (2007) 53(2):260–275LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Ganesan S. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):227–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):911–945CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Krackhardt D.Interpersonal Networks in Organizations (2008) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Tsai W.Social Networks and Organizations (2003) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreft I., Leeuw J. D.Introducing Multilevel Modeling (Introducing Statistical Methods series) (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar N., Scheer L. K., Steenkamp J. E. M. The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):54–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin A. Y., Minton J. W. Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):514–538LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Dunnette M. D. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1976) (Rand McNally, Chicago) 1297–1349Google Scholar
  • Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business—A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1963) 28(1):55–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mayer K. Spillovers and governance: An analysis of knowledge and reputational spillovers in information technology. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):69–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molm L. D. Affect and social exchange: Satisfaction in power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1991) 56(4):475–493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mumford M. D. Social comparison theory and the evaluation of peer evaluations: A review and some applied implications. Personnel Psychol. (1983) 36(4):867–881CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(13):1429–1449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noteboom B., Cropper S., Ebers M., Huxham C., Ring P. S. Learning and innovation in interorganizational relationships. The Oxford Handbook of Interorganizational Relations (2008) (Oxford University Press, New York) 607–634Google Scholar
  • Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(2):241–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Padgett J. F., Ansell C. K. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(6):1259–1319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Scott Morton F. M. Social status, entry and predation: The case of British shipping cartels 1879–1929. J. Indust. Econom. (1999) 47(1):41–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2002) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Congdon R. (2007) . HLM 6.06 for Windows [Computer Software]. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Rhee M., Kim Y. C., Han J. Confidence in imitation: Niche-width strategy in the UK automobile industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(4):501–513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivera M., Soderstrom S. B., Uzzi B. Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2010) 36:91–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D. M.Psychological Contracts in Organizations (1995) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Ruekert R. W., Churchill G. A. Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(2):226–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1998) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Selznick P.TVA and the Grassroots (1949) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
  • Singer J. E. Social comparison—Progress and issues. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1966) 1(Supplement):103–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh P. Perception and reactions to inequity as a function of social comparison referents and hierarchical levels. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1994) 24(6):557–565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thibaut J. W., Kelley H. H.The Social Psychology of Groups (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson L., Loewenstein G. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 51(2):176–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1999) 64(4):481–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2004) 69(3):319–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Bruggen G. H., Lilien G. L., Kacker M. Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. J Marketing Res. (2002) 39(4):469–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheeler L., Zuckerman M., Suls J. M., Miller R. L. Commentary. Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (1977) (Hemisphere, Washington, DC) 335–357Google Scholar
  • Wheeler L., Shaver K. G., Jones R. A., Goethals G. R., Cooper J., Robinson J. E., Gruder C. L., Butzine K. W. Factors determining the choice of a comparison other. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1969) 5(2):219–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 38(3):595–613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. The economics of governance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(2):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood J. V. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psych. Bull. (1989) 106(2):231–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Gozubuyuk R., Milanov H. It's the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Acad. Management Perspect. (2010) 24(1):42–77Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.