Impact of Performance-Based Contracting on Product Reliability: An Empirical Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1465

References

  • Ackerberg D., Botticini M. Endogenous matching and the empirical determinants of contract form. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(3):564–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bijwaard G. E., Engelhardt H., Kohler H.-P., Fürnkranz-Prskawetz A. Instrumental variable estimation for duration data. Causal Analysis in Population Studies: Concepts, Methods, Applications (2009) (Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 111–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P., Dewatripont M.Contract Theory (2005) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Business Wire Rolls-Royce nets CorporateCare contract with NetJets Middle East. (2008) November 19). http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20081119005755/en/Rolls-Royce-Nets-CorporateCare-Contract-NetJets-Middle-EastGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam)229–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K.Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiappori P.-A., Salanie B., Dewatripont M., Hansen L. P., Turnovsky S. J. Testing contract theory: A survey of some recent work. Advances in Economics and Econometrics (2003) 1(Cambridge University Press, New York) 115–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark N., Mouawad J. In Qantas blowout, concern for jet engine maker. The New York Times (2010) November 5). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/06/business/global/06engine.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Agrawal N., Agrawal V. Winning in the aftermarket. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(5):129–138Google Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., de Groote X. A supplier's optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric Information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):444–450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deshpande V., Cohen M. A., Donohue K. An empirical study of service differentiation for weapon system service parts. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(4):518–530LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Einav L., Finkelstein A. Selection in insurance markets: Theory and empirics in pictures. J. Econom. Perspect. (2011) 25(1):115–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geary S., Vitasek K.Performance-Based Logistics: A Contractor's Guide to Life Cycle Product Support Management (2008) (Supply Chain Visions, Bellevue, WA) Google Scholar
  • Gopal A., Sivaramakrishnan K. On vendor preferences for contract types in offshore software projects: The case of fixed price vs. time and materials contracts. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(2):202–220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal A., Sivaramakrishnan K., Krishnan M. S., Mukhopadhyay T. Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1671–1683LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heinrich C. J. Outcomes-based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Rev. (2002) 62(6):712–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho J., Ho K., Mortimer J. Analyzing the welfare impacts of full-line forcing contracts. (2011a) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Ho K., Ho J., Mortimer J. The use of full-line forcing contracts in the video rental industry. (2011b) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Hollis A. Extended warranties, adverse selection, and aftermarkets. J. Risk Insurance (1999) 66(3):321–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(Special Issue):24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard T. N. An empirical examination of moral hazard in the vehicle inspection market. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29(2):406–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hypko P., Tilebein M., Gleich R. Benefits and uncertainties of performance-based contracting in manufacturing industries. J. Service Management (2010) 21(4):460–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer A. V., Schwarz L. B., Zenios S. A. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S.-H. Strategic reliability investments in multi-indenture supply chains. (2011) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S.-H., Cohen M. A., Netessine S. Reliability or inventory? Analysis of product support contracts in the defense industry. (2011) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirk R. L., DePalma T. J. Performance-based logistics contracts: A basic overview. (2005) . CNA Corporation (November 1), http://www.cna.org/research/2005/performance-based-logistics-contracts-basicGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. P. Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(5):1346–1361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee L. F. Generalized economic models with selectivity. Econometrica (1983) 51(2):507–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu M., Ma C., Yuan L. Risk selection and matching in performance-based contracting. Health Econom. (2003) 12(5):339–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masten S., Saussier S., Brousseau E., Glachant J.-M. Econometrics of contracts: An assessment of developments in the empirical literature on contracting. The Economics of Contracts: Theories and Applications (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) . Chap. 16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mortimer J. H. Vertical contracts in the video rental industry. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2008) 75(1):165–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newsome J. Study reveals performance based logistics contract activity continues to grow, despite industry challenges. (2008) . Accessed December 9, 2011, http://thecenter.utk.edu/images/Users/1/PBL/WhitePapers/AviationWeekPBLSurveyConductedforSAPAmericas.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Eppinger S. D. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):189–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Stern S. How does outsourcing affect performance dynamics? Evidence from the automobile industry. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):1963–1979LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):311–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Padmanabhan V. Usage heterogeneity and extended warranties. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(1):33–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A., Train K. A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(2):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C. Uncertainty and incentives. J. Labor Econom. (2002) 20(2):1071–1102Google Scholar
  • Rao H., Greve H. R., Davis G. F. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(3):502–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K., Randall T. Does component sharing help or hurt reliability? An empirical study in the automotive industry. Management Sci. (2008) 54(5):922–938LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Randall W. S., Pohlen T. L., Hanna J. B. Evolving a theory of performance-based logistics using insights from service dominant logic. J. Bus. Logist. (2010) 31(2):35–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rausand M., Høyland A.System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications (2004) (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90(4):629–649CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaver J. M. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. (1998) 44(4):571–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shen Y. Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system. Health Services Res. (2003) 38(2):535–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Standard & Poor's Industry surveys: Aerospace and defense. (2011) . Report, February 10, Standard & Poor's Equity Research Services, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Ren J., Ho T. H., Cohen M. A. An empirical analysis of forecast sharing in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. (2005) 51(2):208–220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas T. J. Performance logistics now coming to Australia. Australian Defense Bus. Rev. (2005) 24(7):23–24Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) DoD guide for achieving reliability, availability, and maintainability. (2005) (U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC) . http://acq.osd.mil/dte/docs/RAM_Guide_080305.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) DoD weapon system acquisition reform: Product support assessment. (2009) (U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC) . Accessed November 11, 2010, https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=328610Google Scholar
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Improved analysis and cost data needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of performance-based logistics. (2008) (U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • U.S. House of Representatives Performance-based acquisitions: Creating solutions or causing problems? (2008) (Committee on Homeland Security, Washington, DC) . Accessed December 9, 2011, http://chsdemocrats.house.gov/hearings/index.asp?ID=136Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.