Organizational Structure and the Limits of Knowledge Sharing: Incentive Conflict and Agency in Car Leasing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1472

References

  • Association of Consumer Vehicle Lessors Lease residual losses finally on the decline. (2001) . Press release, August 3Google Scholar
  • Aghion P., Tirole J. Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105(1):1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahmadjian C., Oxley J. Using hostages to support exchange: Dependence balancing and equity ties in Japanese automotive supply relationships. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2006) 22(1):213–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N., Mui V. Rules of engagement, credibility, and the political economy of organizational dissent. Strategic Organ. (2007) 5(2):107–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J.Information and Economic Behavior (1973) (Federation of Swedish Industries, Stockholm) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P. Capturing knowledge within and across firm boundaries: Evidence from clinical development. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(5):1591–1652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balachander S. Warranty signaling and reputation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(9):1282–1289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G. P., Hubbard T. Make versus buy in trucking: Asset ownership, job design, and information. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):551–572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bazerman M.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (1994) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Besanko D., Sibley D. S. Compensation and transfer pricing in a principal-agent model. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1991) 32(1):55–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach J. L., Eccles R. G. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1989) 15:97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown T. Ford sees U.S. market share stabilizing. Reuters (2002) July 5). http://wardsauto.com/ford-sees-us-market-share-stabilizingGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competitions (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Busse M., Zettelmeyer F., Silva-Risso J. $1,000 Cash back: Asymmetric information in auto manufacturer promotions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(4):1253–1270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciliberto F. Does organizational form affect investment decisions? J. Indust. Econom. (2006) LIV(1):63–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15(1):143–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R., Ross T. W. Prices, product qualities, and asymmetric information: The competitive case. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1984) 51(2):197–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Purohit D. Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):519–534Google Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., White H. C. Price and authority in inter-profit center transactions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Supplement):S17–S51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon Spaghetti organization. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):331–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. The emerging knowledge governance approach. Organization (2007) 14(1):29–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N., Mahnke V., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. Knowledge management: An organizational economics perspective. Handbook of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 78–103Google Scholar
  • Gilligan T. W. Lemons and leases in the used business aircraft market. J. Political Econom. (2004) 112(5):1157–1180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica (1983) 51(1):7–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guha R., Waldman M. Leasing solves the lemons problem. (1997) . Unpublished Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Silo busting: Transcending barriers to build high growth organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007) 85(5):98–108Google Scholar
  • Hayek F. The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1945) 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  • Hendel I., Lizzeri A. The role of leasing under adverse selection. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(1):113–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henisz W. The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(2):355–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. The firm as a subeconomy. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1999) 15(1):74–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal—Agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 8(Special Issue):24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Tirole J. Transfer pricing and organizational form. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(2):201–228Google Scholar
  • Jin G., Leslie P. Reputation incentives for restaurant hygiene. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics (2009) 1(1):237–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson J., Waldman M. Leasing, lemons, and buybacks. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):247–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson J., Waldman M. Leasing, lemons, and moral hazard. J. Law Econom. (2010) 53(2):307–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joskow P. Introducing competition into regulated network industires: From hierarchies to markets in electricity. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5(2):341–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanatas G., Qi J. Underwriting by commercial banks: Incentive conflicts, scope economies, and project quality. J. Money, Credit, Banking (1998) 30(1):119–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lafontaine F., Slade M. Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature (2007) 45(3):629–685CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois R. N. Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 49(1):19–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macher J. T. Technological development and the boundaries of the firm. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):826–843LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macher J. T., Boerner C. Technological development at the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in drug development. Strategic Management J. (2012) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macher J. T., Richman B. D. Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics (2008) 10(1). Article 1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer K. J., Nickerson J. A. Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):225–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Price and advertising signals of product quality. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):796–821CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
  • Monteverde K. Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. (1995) 41(10):1624–1638LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mullainathan S., Scharfstein D. Do firm boundaries matter? Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. (2001) 91(2):195–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A. Toward an economizing theory of strategy: The choice of strategic position, assets, and organizational form. (1997) . Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Silverman B. S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):433–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):617–632LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Comparison costs and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(3):1429–1449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):311–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osterloh M., Frey B. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):538–550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oxley J. E. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1997) 13(2):387–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L. Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(3):323–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):153–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(1):7–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purohit D. Exploring the relationship between the markets for new and used durable goods: The case of automobiles. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):154–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao A. R., Qu L., Ruekert R. W. Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(2):258–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rauschenberg B. 2001 mid-year used vehicle report & forecast. Auto Remarketing (2001) July 1Google Scholar
  • Rawley E., Simcoe T. S. Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. (2010) 56(9):1534–1550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rindfleisch A., Heide J. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. J. Marketing (1997) 61(4):30–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S., Morrison E. Psychological contracts and organizational citizenship behavior: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. J. Organ. Behav. (1995) 16(3):289–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross D. G. On evaluation costs in strategic factor markets: The implications for competition and organizational design. Management Sci. (2012) 58(4):791–804LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereals market. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(2):305–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stokey N. Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12(1):112–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1992) 18(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Waldman M. A new perspective on planned obsolescence. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(1):273–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Corporate finance and corporate governance. J. Finance (1988) 43(3):567–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(12):1087–1108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wulf J. Internal capital markets and firm-level compensation incentives for division managers. J. Labor Econom. (2002) 20(2):219–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.