Information Technology and Trademarks: Implications for Product Variety

References

• Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Wu D. Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2006) MilwaukeeCrossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Kauffman R. J. 50th anniversary article: The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in Management Science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):281–298Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Datar S. M., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T., Kaplan R. Costs of product and process complexity. Measures of Manufacturing Excellence (1990) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 269–290Google Scholar
• Barua A., Kriebel C., Mukhopadhyay T. An economic analysis of strategic information technology investments. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):313–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B., Putsis W. P. Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):137–153Link, Google Scholar
• Bayus B., Erickson G., Jacobson R. The financial rewards of new product introductions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(2):197–210Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J., Draganska M., Simonson I. The influence of product variety on brand perception and choice. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(4):460–472Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. S., Bharadwaj S. G., Konsynski B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):1008–1024Link, Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Christen M. Pioneering plus a broad product line strategy: Higher profits or deeper losses? Management Sci. (2009) 55(6):958–967Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology, work organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooke G. M. Information technology and productivity. (1991) . Ph.D thesis, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):23–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Computing productivity: Firm-Level Evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2003) 85(4):793–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M., Yang S. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (2002) 1:138–199Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Smith M., Hu J. Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Sci. (2003) 48(11):1580–1596Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G., Olivares M. Drivers of finished goods inventory performance in the U.S. automobile industry. Management Sci. (2010) 56(1):202–216Link, Google Scholar
• Chamberlin E. H.The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (1933) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cheng Z., Nault B. R. Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1199–1216Link, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P., Ramirez R., Kraemer K. L., Melville N. P. Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(2):392–408Link, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Council of Economic Advisers Economic report of the president. (1999) (U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Cottrell T., Nault B. Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(10):1005–1025Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahan E., Srinivasan V. The predictive power of Internet-based product concept testing using visual depiction and animation. J. Product Innovation Management (2000) 17(2):99–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Groote X. Flexibility and marketing/manufacturing coordination. Internat. J. Production Econom. (1994) 36(2):153–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan R., Jing B., Seidmann A. Product customization and price competition on the Internet. Management Sci. (2003) 49(8):1055–1070Link, Google Scholar
• Dickson P. R., Ginter J. L. Market segmentation, product differentiation, and marketing strategy. J. Marketing (1987) 51(2):1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowell G. Product line strategies of new entrants in an established industry: Evidence from the U.S. bicycle industry. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(10):959–979Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fader P. S., Hardie B. Modeling consumer choice among SKUs. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(4):442–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg F. M., Kahn B. E., McAlister L. Market share response when consumers seek variety. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):227–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M., Jain A., MacDuffie J. P., Kogut B., Bowman E. Strategies for product variety: Lessons from the auto industry. Redesigning the Firm (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 116–154Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(2):105–116Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Ittner C. D. Impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations. Management Sci. (1999) 45(6):771–786Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132Link, Google Scholar
• Forza C., Salvador F. Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfillment process: The contribution of product configuration systems. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2002) 21(2):85–93Google Scholar
• Gao G. Information technology and product variety. (2005) . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Gerwin D. Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Sci. (1993) 39(4):395–410Link, Google Scholar
• Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1452–1466Link, Google Scholar
• Goyal M., Netessine S. Strategic technology choice and capacity investment under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2007) 53(2):192–207Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Recent contributions to optimal product positioning and buyer segmentation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1989) 41(2):127–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. The manufacturing sector master file: 1959–1987. (1990) . NBER Working Paper 3366. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B., Cummins C., Laderman E., Mundy J. The R&D master file documentation. (1988) . NBER Working Paper T0072, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hui K. L. Product variety under brand influence: An empirical investigation of personal computer demand. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):686–700Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):419–423Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M.Editors, Patents, Citations & Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Joshi K., Lauer T. Impact of information technology on users' work environment: A case of computer aided design (CAD) system implementation. Inform. Management Rev. (1998) 34(6):349–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman R. J., Kriebel C. H., Strassmann P. A., Berger P., Swanson E. B., Kriebel C. H., Kauffman R. J. Measuring and modeling the business value of information technology. Measuring Business Value of Information Technologies (1988) (ICIT Press, Washington, DC) 93–119Chap. 4Google Scholar
• Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve success? Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1216–1231Link, Google Scholar
• Kelley M. Productivity and information technology: The elusive connection. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1406–1425Link, Google Scholar
• Kleis L., Chwelos P., Ramirez R. V., Cockburn I. Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. (2012) 23(1):42–59Link, Google Scholar
• Lancaster K. The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):189–206Link, Google Scholar
• Landes W., Posner R. Trademark law: An economic perspective. J. Law Econom. (1987) 30(2):265–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B.Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting (2001) (The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Liao T. Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Liberatore M. J., Stylianou A. C. Expert support systems for new product development decision making: A modeling framework and applications. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1296–1316Link, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F. R. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3:201–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678Link, Google Scholar
• McCutcheon D. M., Raturi A. S., Meredith J. R. The customization-responsiveness squeeze. Sloan Management Rev. (1994) 35(2):89–99Google Scholar
• Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Parlaktürk A. K. Competitive customization. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):377–390Link, Google Scholar
• Miaoulis G., D'Amato N. Consumer confusion and trademark infringement. J. Marketing (1978) 42(2):48–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
• Mittal N., Nault B. R. Investments in information technology: Indirect effects and information technology intensity. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(1):140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Montgomery C. A. The measurement of firm diversification: Some new empirical evidence. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25(2):299–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netessine S., Taylor T. Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):101–117Link, Google Scholar
• Pakes A., Griliches Z., Griliches Z. Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. R&D, Patents, and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 55–72Google Scholar
• Ramdas K. Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randall T., Ulrich K. Product variety, supply chain structure, and firm performance: Analysis of the U.S. bicycle industry. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1588–1604Link, Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A., Lilien G. L. Software tools for new product development. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):177–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P.Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (1974) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Saunders A. Valuing IT-related intangible capital. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) 2010 Proc. (2010) St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Seethamraju C., Hand J., Lev B. The value relevance of trademarks. Intangible Assets: Values, Measures, and Risks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 228–247Google Scholar
• Skinner W. The focused factory. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1974) 52(3):113–121Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., McEvily S., Ren C. R., Roy R. Niche width revisited: Organizational scope, behavior and performance. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(10):915–936Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan K., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T. Impact of electronic data interchange technology support on JIT shipments. Management Sci. (1994) 40(10):291–1304Link, Google Scholar
• Stalk G., Hout T.Competing Against Time (1990) (Free Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiroh K. Reassessing the role of IT in the production function: A meta-analysis. (2002) . Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Tauber E. Brand franchise extension: New product benefits from existing brand names. Bus. Horizons (1981) 24(2):36–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thonemann J., Bradley R. The effect of product variety on supply chain performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 143(3):548–569Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (1988) . Current industrial report: Manufacturing technology, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Yunes T. H., Napolitano D., Scheller-Wolf A., Tayur S. Building efficient product portfolios at John Deere and Company. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(4):615–629Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L. e-Commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):275–295Link, Google Scholar
• Zipkin P. H. Performance analysis of a multi-item production-inventory system under alternative policies. Management Sci. (1995) 41(4):690–703Link, Google Scholar