Specialization and Variety in Repetitive Tasks: Evidence from a Japanese Bank

References

• Allahverdi A., Gupta J. N. D., Aldowaisan T. A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations. Omega (1999) 27(2):219–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allport A., Wylie G., Monsell S., Driver J. Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 35–70Google Scholar
• Allport A., Styles E. A., Hsieh S., Umilta C., Moscovitch M. Shifting intentional set. Attention and Performance XV (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 421–452Google Scholar
• Anbalagan P., Vouk M. “Days of the week” effect in predicting the time taken to fix defects. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop Defects in Large Software Systems (2009) ChicagoCrossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) Google Scholar
• Argote L., Miron-Spektor E. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2011) 22(5):1123–1137Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D. A.Organizational Learning (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working memory. Science (1992) 255(5044):556–559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahl H. C., Ritzman L. P., Gupta J. N. D. Determining lot sizes and resource requirements: A review. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(3):329–345Link, Google Scholar
• Bailey C. D. Forgetting and the learning curve: A laboratory study. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):340–352Link, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016Link, Google Scholar
• Beck N. Time-series cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Rev. Polit. Sci. (2001) 4:271–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E., Donohue K., Schultz K. L. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):737–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boh W. F., Slaughter S. A., Espinosa J. A. Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1315–1331Link, Google Scholar
• Bohn R. E. From art to science in manufacturing: The evolution of technological knowledge. Foundations Trends Tech., Inform. Oper. Management (2005) 1(2):129–212Google Scholar
• Bohn R. E., Lapré M. A., Jaber M. Y. Accelerated learning by experimentation. Learning Curves: Theory, Models, and Applications (2011) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) 191–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau J., Hopp W., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(3):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Bryson A., Forth J. Are there day of the week productivity effects? (2007) . Discussion Paper 4, Manpower Human Resource Lab, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/13176Google Scholar
• Cameron A. C., Gelbach J. B., Miller D. L. Robust inference with multi-way clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2011) 29(2):238–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cellier J.-M., Eyrolle H. Interference between switched tasks. Ergonomics (1992) 35(1):25–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark J. R., Huckman R. S. Broadening focus: Spillovers, complementarities, and specialization in the hospital industry. Management Sci. (2012) 58(4):708–722Link, Google Scholar
• Drucker P. F.Management Challenges for the 21st Century (1999) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
• Dutton J. M., Thomas A. Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):235–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis H. C.The Transfer of Learning (1965) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Fisher C. D. Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations (1993) 46(3):395–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Ittner C. D. The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: Empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(6):771–786Link, Google Scholar
• Fried Y., Ferris G. R. The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. (1987) 40(2):287–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F., Pisano G. P. Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):676–691Link, Google Scholar
• Gino F., Argote L., Miron-Spektor E., Todorova G. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2010) 111(2):102–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopher D., Armony L., Greenshpan Y. Switching tasks and attention policies. J Experiment. Psych: General (2000) 129(3):308–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh L., Rosenblatt Z. Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(3):438–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. The nature of the task as a determiner of job behavior. Personnel Psych. (1969) 22(4):435–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1976) 16(2):250–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D. A., Klein K. J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1199–1228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzberg F. One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1968) 46(1):53–62Google Scholar
• Huckman R. S., MacCormack A. (2009) . BYD Company, Ltd. HBS Case 606-139, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Huckman R. S., Pisano G. P. The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2006) 52(4):473–488Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman R. S., Staats B. R. Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2011) 13(3):310–328Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman R. S., Zinner D. Does focus improve operational performance? Lessons from the management of clinical trials. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(2):173–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman R. S., Staats B. R., Upton D. M. Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):85–100Link, Google Scholar
• Humphrey S. E., Nahrgang J. D., Morgeson F. P. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(5):1332–1356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K. The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U.S. and Japanese plants. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):704–721Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Simons T. The transfer of experience in groups of organizations: Implications for performance and competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48(12):1517–1533Link, Google Scholar
• Kantor P. B., Zangwill W. I. Theoretical foundation for a learning rate budget. Management Sci. (1991) 37(3):315–330Link, Google Scholar
• KC D. S., Staats B. R. Accumulating a portfolio of experience: The effect of focal and related experience on surgeon performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2012) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• KC D. S., Terwiesch C. Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Sci. (2009) 55(9):1486–1498Link, Google Scholar
• KC D. S., Terwiesch C. The effects of focus on performance: Evidence from California hospitals. Management Sci. (2011) 57(11):1897–1912Link, Google Scholar
• Langer E. J.Mindfulness (1989) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lapré M. A., Jaber M. Y. Inside the learning curve: Opening the black box of the learning curve. Learning Curves: Theory, Models, and Applications (2011) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) 23–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapré M. A., Nembhard I. M. Inside the organizational learning curve: Understanding the organizational learning process. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management (2010) 4(1):1–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapré M. A., Tsikriktsis N. Organizational learning curves for customer dissatisfaction: Heterogeneity across airlines. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):352–366Link, Google Scholar
• Lapré M. A., Mukherjee A. S., Wassenhove L. N. V. Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):597–611Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy F. K. Adaptation in the production process. Management Sci. (1965) 11(6):B136–B154Link, Google Scholar
• Levy F., Murnane R. J.The New Division of Labor: How Computers are Creating the Next Job Market (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindbeck A., Snower D. J. Multitask learning and the reorganization of work: From Tayloristic to holistic organization. J. Labor Econom. (2000) 18(3):353–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie J. P., Sethuraman K., Fisher M. L. Product variety and manufacturing performance: Evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):350–369Link, Google Scholar
• Monsell S. Task switching. Trends Cognitive Sci. (2003) 7(3):134–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A., Mitchell W., Talbot F. B. The impact of new manufacturing requirements on production line productivity and quality at a focused factory. J. Oper. Management (2000) 18(2):139–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S., Balasubramanian S., Swaminathan J. M. A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Sci. (2009) 55(11):1861–1876Link, Google Scholar
• Nembhard D. A., Osothsilp N. An empirical comparison of forgetting models. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(3):283–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A., Rosenbloom P., Anderson J. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the power law of practice. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (1981) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 1–55Google Scholar
• Ortega J. Job rotation as a learning mechanism. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1361–1370Link, Google Scholar
• Piaget J.The Psychology of Intelligence (1963) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
• Pines A., Maslach C. Characteristics of staff burnout in mental health settings. Psychiatric Services (1978) 29(4):233–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn R. W. Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Admin. Sci. Q. (2005) 50(4):610–641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Argote L., Brooks D. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):869–881Link, Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J.Management and the Worker (1934) (Harvard University, Boston) Google Scholar
• Rogers R. D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Experiment. Psych. (1995) 124(2):207–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy D. F. “Banana Time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organ. (1959) 18(4):158–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein J. S., Meyer D. E., Evans J. E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (2001) 27(4):763–797Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarason I. G., Pierce G. R.Cognitive Interference (1996) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Schendel J. D., Hagman J. D. On sustaining procedural skills over a prolonged retention interval. J. Appl. Psych. (1982) 67(5):605–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Vidal P., Ployhart R. E., Marangoni A. Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):39–56Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt R. A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psych. Rev. (1975) 82(4):225–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz K. L., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility. J. Oper. Management (2003) 21(1):81–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz K. L., Schoenherr T., Nembhard D. An example and a proposal concerning the correlation of worker processing times in parallel tasks. Management Sci. (2010) 56(1):176–191Link, Google Scholar
• Schultz K. L., Juran D. C., Boudreau J. W., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1595–1607Link, Google Scholar
• Scott W. E. Activation theory and task design. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1966) 1(1):3–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shingo S.A Study of the Toyota Production System from an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint (1989) (Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Simons J. V., Russell G. R. A case study of batching in a mass service operation. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20(5):577–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U. Weather to go to college. Econom. J. (2010) 120(543):270–280Google Scholar
• Skinner W. The focused factory. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1974) 52(3):113–121Google Scholar
• Skinner W., Clark K. B., Hayes R. H., Lorenz C. The taming of lions: How manufacturing leadership evolved. The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma (1985) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 63–110Google Scholar
• Smith A.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) (W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear S., Bowen H. K. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):97–106Google Scholar
• Staw B. M. The consequences of turnover. J. Occupational Behav. (1980) 1(4):253–273Google Scholar
• Stross R. When the assembly line moves online. New York Times (2010) October 30):BU5Google Scholar
• Taylor F. W.The Principles of Scientific Management (1911) (Harper and Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
• Tsikriktsis N. The effect of operational performance and focus on profitability: A longitudinal study of the U.S. airline industry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(4):506–517Link, Google Scholar
• Tucker A. L., Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):894–907Link, Google Scholar
• Tzur M. Learning in setups: Analysis, minimal forecast horizons, and algorithms. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1732–1743Link, Google Scholar
• Upton D. M., Margolis J. D. (1992) . McDonald's Corp. HBS Case 693-028, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Upton D. M., Staats B. R. Radically simple IT. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2008) 86(3):118–124Google Scholar
• Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Warr P.Work, Happiness, and Unhappiness (2007) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psych. (2003) 46(4):361–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersma E. Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1903–1915Link, Google Scholar
• Wylie G., Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psych. Res. (2000) 63(3–4):212–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yelle L. E. The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive story. Decision Sci. (1979) 10(2):302–328Crossref, Google Scholar