Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of “Independent” Directors
Published Online:9 Mar 2012https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1483
References
- A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance (2007) 62:217–250Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932) (The Macmillan Company, New York) Google Scholar
- Managing with style: The effect of managers on corporate policy. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:1169–1208Crossref, Google Scholar
- The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. J. Corporation Law (2002) 27:231–273Google Scholar
- What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives. J. Financial Econom. (1999) 52:341–377Crossref, Google Scholar
- Takeover defenses in the shadow of the pill: A critique of the scientific evidence. Texas Law Rev. (2000) 79:271–382Google Scholar
- Sell-side school ties. J. Finance (2010) 65:1409–1437Crossref, Google Scholar
- Board composition, corporate performance, and the Cadbury Committee Recommendation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2007) 42:535–564Crossref, Google Scholar
- Do IPO charters maximize firm value? Antitakeover provisions in IPOs. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2001) 17:83–120Crossref, Google Scholar
- Detecting earnings management. Accounting Rev. (1995) 70:193–226Google Scholar
- Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? J. Accounting Res. (2005) 43:153–193Crossref, Google Scholar
- When are outside directors effective? (2008) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26:301–325Crossref, Google Scholar
- Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 firms. J. Bus. (2005) 78:1943–1972Crossref, Google Scholar
- Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Finance (2006) 61:689–724Crossref, Google Scholar
- The emergence of corporate governance from Wall St. to Main St.: Outside directors, board diversity, earnings management, and managerial incentives to bear risk. Financial Rev. (2003) 38:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership when firms default. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 27:355–387Crossref, Google Scholar
- Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:107–155Crossref, Google Scholar
- Financial expertise of directors. J. Financial Econom. (2008) 88:323–354Crossref, Google Scholar
- A theory of board control and size. Rev. Financial Stud. (2008) 21:1797–1832Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. J. Accounting Econom. (1985) 7:85–107Crossref, Google Scholar
- Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:96–118Google Scholar
- Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Econom. Policy Rev. (Federal Reserve Board of New York) (2003) April):7–26Google Scholar
- Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased forecasts. J. Finance (2003) 58:313–351Crossref, Google Scholar
- The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance (1993) 48:831–880Crossref, Google Scholar
- Outside directorships and corporate performance. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 389–410Crossref, Google Scholar
- What's happened over the past 10 years to the selection of retired CEOs as board members? (2007) . Working paper, Indiana University, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
- Underwriting relationships, analysts' earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. (1998) 25:101–127Crossref, Google Scholar
- Analyst impartiality and investment banking relationships. J. Accounting Res. (2005) 43:623–650Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competing for securities underwriting mandates: Banking relationships and analyst recommendations. J. Finance (2006) 61:301–340Crossref, Google Scholar
- Scaling the hierarchy: How and why investment banks compete for syndicate co-management appointments. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22:3977–4007Crossref, Google Scholar
- Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 12:653–686Crossref, Google Scholar
- Does forecast accuracy matter to security analysts? Accounting Rev. (1999) 74:185–200Crossref, Google Scholar
- Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. J. Financial Quant. Analysis (2005) 40:283–306Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance. Yale Law Rev. (2005) 114:1521–1611Google Scholar
- Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Accounting Rev. (1996) 71:289–315Google Scholar
- The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2006) 51:169–204Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reputation and performance among security analysts. J. Finance (1992) 47:1811–1836Crossref, Google Scholar
- Do brokerage analysts' recommendations have investment value? J. Finance (1996) 51:137–167Crossref, Google Scholar
- Board members and company value. Financial Markets Portfolio Management (2006) 20:33–47Crossref, Google Scholar

