Network Progeny? Prefounding Social Ties and the Success of New Entrants

References

• Allen M., Atkin T., Neill M. C. R., Platter J., Pierre B. S.New World of Wine (1998) (Mitchell Beazley, London) Google Scholar
• Barnett W. P., Hansen M. T. The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(S1):139–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(3):563–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bramble L., Cullen C., Kushner J., Pickering G., Campbell G., Guibert N. The development and economic impact of the wine industry in Ontario, Canada. Wine, Society, and Globalization Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Wine Industry (2007) (Palgrave Macmillan, New York) 63–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton M. D., Sørensen J. B., Beckman C. M. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Res. Sociol. Organ. (2002) 19:229–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A. K. Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(2):185–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corredoira R. A., Rosenkopf L. Should auld acquaintance be forgot? The reverse transfer of knowledge through mobility ties. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(2):159–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G., Glaeser E. L. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105(5):889–927Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. P., Francis J., Bercovitz J. Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters. Regional Stud. (2005) 39(1):129–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman J. Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Adv. Stud. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Econom. Growth (1986) 1:33–52Google Scholar
• Gompers P., Lerner J., Scharfstein D. Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):577–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawley A. H.Human Ecology. A Theory of Community Structure (1950) (Ronald Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsch P. M. Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems. Amer. J. Sociol. (1972) 77(4):639–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G., Hannan M. T., Koçak Ö. Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2009) 74(1):150–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Opportunity and constraint: Organizations' learning from the operating experience of industries. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(S1):75–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Lifschitz A. Kinship in the shadow of the corporation: The interbuilder network in Clyde River shipbuilding, 1711–1990. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2006) 71(2):334–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Roberts P. W. Friendship among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(2):387–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):984–1001Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53(4):616–631Link, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. The origin and growth of clusters: The making of silicon valley and detroit. J. Urban Econom. (2010) 67(1):15–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S., Sleeper S. Entry by spinoffs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1291–1306Link, Google Scholar
• Marshall A.Principles of Economics (1890) (MacMillan, London) Google Scholar
• Martin J. Tenacious tannins: Uprooting canada's wine industry before and after the free trade agreement. (2006) . Case study, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, TorontoGoogle Scholar
• McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27:415–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R., Sørensen J. B. Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. (2010) 56(7):1116–1126Link, Google Scholar
• Pashigian B. P., Gould E. D. Internalizing externalities: The pricing of space in shopping malls. J. Law Econom. (1998) 41(1):115–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J. A geneological approach to life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(3):474–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J. Organizational geneologies and the persistence of gender ineuqality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(3):440–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Ruef M., Aldrich H. E., Carter N. M. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68(2):195–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreiner J.Icewine: The Complete Story (2001) (Warwick Publishing, Toronto) Google Scholar
• Schreiner J.The Wines of Canada (2005) (Mitchell Beazley, London) Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Audia P. G. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(2):424–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Rivkin J. W., Fleming L. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy (2006) 35(7):994–1017Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Sorenson O. Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. (2008) 1(3–4):211–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P. H., Flynn K. H., Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B. Entrepreneurship, networks, and geographies. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship (2005) 1(Springer, New York) 401–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Embeddedness and price formation in corporate law markets. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2004) 69(3):319–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. W. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1398–1438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. W., Kim T.-Y., Ukanwa K., von Rittmann J. Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003) 108(5):1018–1074Crossref, Google Scholar