Product and Price Competition with Satiation Effects

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1489

References

  • Allon G., Federgruen A. Competition in service industries. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(1):37–55LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allon G., Federgruen A., Pierson M. Price competition under multinomial logit demand functions with random demand coefficients. (2010) . Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Alptekinoğlu A., Corbett C. J. Mass customization vs. mass production: Variety and price competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(2):204–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse J.-F.Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M., Sarin R. K. Satiation in discounted utility. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(1):170–181LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M., Sarin R. K. Predicting utility under satiation and habit formation. Management Sci. (2010) 56(2):286–301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein D., Ottenfeld M., Witte C. L. A study of consumer attitudes regarding variability of menu offerings in the context of an upscale seafood restaurant. J. Foodservice Bus. Res. (2008) 11(4):398–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(6):868–886LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P.Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control (2000) 12nd ed.(Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Besbes O., Saure D. Product assortment and price competition under multinomial logit demand. (2010) . Working paper, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Kök A. G. Category managment and coordination in retail assortment planning in the presence of basket shipping consumers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):934–951LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Terwiesch C., Xu Y. On the effects of consumer search and firm entry in a multiproduct competitive market. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):461–473LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F., Gallien J. Dynamic assortment with demand learning for seasonal consumer goods. Management Sci. (2007) 53(2):276–292LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F., Martínez-de-Albéniz V., Netessine S., Tang C. The effect of assortment rotation on consumer choice, and its impact on competition. Operations Management Models with Consumer-Driven Demand (2009) (Springer, New York) 63–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavusoglu H., Cavusoglu H., Raghunathan S. Selecting a customization strategy under competition: Mass customization, targeted mass customization, and product proliferation. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2007) 54(1):12–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chamberlin E. H.The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (1933) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chintagunta P. K. Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand-purchase timing. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):253–270LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit A., Stiglitz E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1977) 67(3):297–308Google Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Yang N. Competition under generalized attraction models: Applications to quality competition under yield uncertainty. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):2028–2043LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg F. M., Kahn B. E., McAlister L. Market share response when consumers seek variety. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):227–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gallego G., Huh W. T., Kang W., Phillips R. Price competition with the attraction demand model: Existence of unique equilibrium and its stability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(4):359–375LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gans N. Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):207–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P., Nueno J. L. Zara: Fast fashion. (2003) . HBS Case 9-703-416, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Cumulative utility consumer theory. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1997) 38(4):737–761CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Givon M. Variety seeking through brand switching. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(1):1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T.-H., Tang C. S.Product Variety Management: Research Advances (1998) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Bradlow E. T., Wansink B. The variety of an assortment. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):527–546LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W. J., Xu X. A static approximation for dynamic demand substitution with applications in a competitive market. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(3):630–645LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
  • Kahn B. E. Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. J. Retailing Consumer Services (1995) 2(3):139–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn B. E., Kalwani M. U., Morrison D. G. Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(2):89–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeley G., Clark A. Zara overtakes Gap to become world's largest clothing retailer. Guardian News (2008) August 11). http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/aug/11/zara.gap.fashionGoogle Scholar
  • Kök G., Xu Y. Optimal and competitive assortments with endogenous pricing under hierarchical consumer choice models. Management Sci. (2011) 57(9):1546–1563LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kök G., Fisher M. L., Vaidyanathan R., Agrawal N., Smith S. A. Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Retail Supply Chain Management (2008) (Kluwer, New York) 99–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K.Variety, Equity, and Efficiency (1979) (Columbia University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K. The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):189–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lim W. S., Tang C. S. Optimal product rollover strategies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 174:905–922CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAlister L. A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(2):141–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAlister L., Pessemier E. Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(3):311–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H., Parlaktürk A. K. Product-line competition: Customization vs. proliferation. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):2039–2053LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson K. Gap tries to improve “dull” clothes. MSN Money (2011) May 19). http://money.msn.com/Google Scholar
  • Popescu I., Wu Y. Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(3):413–429LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K. Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):79–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang C. S. A review of marketing-operations interface models: From co-existence to coordination and collaboration. (2009) . Working paper. UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  • Xia N., Rajagopalan S. Standard vs. custom products: Variety, lead time, and price competition. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):887–900LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.