Product and Price Competition with Satiation Effects
Published Online:6 Apr 2012https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1489
References
- Competition in service industries. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(1):37–55Link, Google Scholar
- Price competition under multinomial logit demand functions with random demand coefficients. (2010) . Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
- Mass customization vs. mass production: Variety and price competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(2):204–217Link, Google Scholar
- Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Satiation in discounted utility. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(1):170–181Link, Google Scholar
- Predicting utility under satiation and habit formation. Management Sci. (2010) 56(2):286–301Link, Google Scholar
- A study of consumer attitudes regarding variability of menu offerings in the context of an upscale seafood restaurant. J. Foodservice Bus. Res. (2008) 11(4):398–411Crossref, Google Scholar
- A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(6):868–886Link, Google Scholar
- Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control (2000) 12nd ed.(Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
- Product assortment and price competition under multinomial logit demand. (2010) . Working paper, Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Category managment and coordination in retail assortment planning in the presence of basket shipping consumers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):934–951Link, Google Scholar
- On the effects of consumer search and firm entry in a multiproduct competitive market. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):461–473Link, Google Scholar
- Dynamic assortment with demand learning for seasonal consumer goods. Management Sci. (2007) 53(2):276–292Link, Google Scholar
- , Netessine S., Tang C. The effect of assortment rotation on consumer choice, and its impact on competition. Operations Management Models with Consumer-Driven Demand (2009) (Springer, New York) 63–79Crossref, Google Scholar
- Selecting a customization strategy under competition: Mass customization, targeted mass customization, and product proliferation. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2007) 54(1):12–28Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (1933) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand-purchase timing. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):253–270Link, Google Scholar
- Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1977) 67(3):297–308Google Scholar
- Competition under generalized attraction models: Applications to quality competition under yield uncertainty. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):2028–2043Link, Google Scholar
- Market share response when consumers seek variety. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(2):227–237Crossref, Google Scholar
- Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Price competition with the attraction demand model: Existence of unique equilibrium and its stability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(4):359–375Link, Google Scholar
- Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):207–221Link, Google Scholar
- Zara: Fast fashion. (2003) . HBS Case 9-703-416, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Cumulative utility consumer theory. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1997) 38(4):737–761Crossref, Google Scholar
- Variety seeking through brand switching. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(1):1–22Link, Google Scholar
- Product Variety Management: Research Advances (1998) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
- The variety of an assortment. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):527–546Link, Google Scholar
- A static approximation for dynamic demand substitution with applications in a competitive market. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(3):630–645Link, Google Scholar
- Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
- Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. J. Retailing Consumer Services (1995) 2(3):139–148Crossref, Google Scholar
- Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(2):89–100Crossref, Google Scholar
- Zara overtakes Gap to become world's largest clothing retailer. Guardian News (2008) August 11). http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/aug/11/zara.gap.fashionGoogle Scholar
- Optimal and competitive assortments with endogenous pricing under hierarchical consumer choice models. Management Sci. (2011) 57(9):1546–1563Link, Google Scholar
- , Agrawal N., Smith S. A. Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Retail Supply Chain Management (2008) (Kluwer, New York) 99–153Crossref, Google Scholar
- Variety, Equity, and Efficiency (1979) (Columbia University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):189–206Link, Google Scholar
- Optimal product rollover strategies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 174:905–922Crossref, Google Scholar
- A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(2):141–150Crossref, Google Scholar
- Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(3):311–322Crossref, Google Scholar
- Product-line competition: Customization vs. proliferation. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):2039–2053Link, Google Scholar
- Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
- Gap tries to improve “dull” clothes. MSN Money (2011) May 19). http://money.msn.com/Google Scholar
- Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(3):413–429Link, Google Scholar
- Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
- A review of marketing-operations interface models: From co-existence to coordination and collaboration. (2009) . Working paper. UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Standard vs. custom products: Variety, lead time, and price competition. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):887–900Link, Google Scholar

