The Power of Diversity over Large Solution Spaces

References

• Argote L., Ingram P., Levine J. M., Moreland R. L. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions (2000) 82:1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berend D., Tassa T. Improved bounds on Bell numbers and on moments of sums of random variables. Probab. Math. Statist. (2010) 30:185–205Google Scholar
• Blinder A. S., Morgan J. Are two heads better than one? Monetary policy by committee. J. Money, Credit, Banking (2005) 37:798–811Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blinder A. S., Morgan J. Do monetary policy committees need leaders? A report on an experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98:224–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornstein G., Kugler T., Ziegelmeyer A. Individual and group decisions in the centipede game: Are groups more “rational” players? J. Exp. Soc. Psych. (2004) 40:599–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns J. G., Dyer A. G. Diversity of speed-accuracy strategies benefits social insects. Current Biology (2004) 18:R953–R954Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collevecchio A., LiCalzi M. The probability of nontrivial common knowledge. (2011) . Working Paper 6/2011, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, Venezia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
• Conradt L., List C. Group decisions in humans and animals: A survey. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B (2009) 364:719–742Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper D. J., Kagel J. H. Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95:477–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50:352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlin K. B., Weingart L. R., Hinds P. J. Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:1107–1123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J. H. Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950–1990. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions (1992) 52:3–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowling D. W. The best advice I ever got: Hans-Paul Bürkner, president and chief executive officer, the Boston Consulting Group. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007) December). http://hbr.org/2007/12/the-best-advice-i-ever-got-hans-paul-burkner-president-and-chief-executive-officer-the-boston-consulting-group/ar/1Google Scholar
• Durrett R.Random Graph Dynamics (2007) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Feynman R., Leighton R.Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character (1985) (W.W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Gerchak Y., He Q.-M. Group size and parallelism effects in tasks with heterogeneous levels of difficulty: A stochastic order approach. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. (2004) 13:257–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. (2010) 56:591–605Link, Google Scholar
• Hastie R., Owen G., Grofman B. Review essay: Experimental evidence on group accuracy. Information Pooling and Group Decision Making (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 129–157Google Scholar
• Hill G. W. Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psych. Bull. (1982) 91:517–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L., Page S. Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. J. Econom. Theory (2001) 97:123–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L., Page S. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2004) 101:16385–16389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E., Joshi A., Erhardt N. L. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Management (2003) 29:801–830Google Scholar
• Janis I.Victims of Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (1972) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Joe H.Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts (1997) (Chapman & Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher M. G., Sutter M. The decision maker matters: Individual versus group behavior in experimental beauty-contest games. Econom. J. (2005) 115:200–223Google Scholar
• Kornik J. Excellence in diversity: Consulting firms honored. Consulting Magazine (2008) July 29). http://www.consultingmag.com/article/ARTALPII792?C=CeHrcuiZ2tPzIC90Google Scholar
• Kornish K. J., Ulrich K. T. Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. (2011) 57:107–128Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan H. A., Miller A., Judge W. Q. Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:361–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laughlin P. R. Collective induction: Twelve postulates. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions (1999) 80:50–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laughlin P. R., Bonner B. L., Miner A. G. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions (2002) 88:605–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laughlin P. R., Hatch E. C., Silver J. S., Boh L. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 90:644–651Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E. P. Globalisation and the market for teammates. Econom. J. (1999) 109:C15–C40Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Moreland R. L., Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. Small groups. Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) 2(McGraw-Hill, Boston) 415–469Google Scholar
• Liker A., Bókony V. Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2009) 106:7893–7898Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E., Neale M. A. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest (2005) 6:31–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marschak J., Radner R.Economic Theory of Teams (1972) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Michaelsen L. K., Watson W. E., Black R. H. A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74:834–839Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page S.The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, Societies (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Paulus P. B., Yang H. -C. Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decisions (2000) 82:76–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitman J.Combinatorial Stochastic Processes (2006) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) Google Scholar
• Pittel B. Where the typical set partitions meet and join. Electronic J. Combinatorics (2000) 7:R5Google Scholar
• Postrel S. Islands of shared knowledge: Specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:303–320Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Zuckerman E., McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:101–133Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A. On price recognition and computational complexity in a monopolistic model. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101:473–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachkov V. N.Probabilistic Methods in Combinatorial Analysis (1997) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:662–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward A. J. W., Herbert-Read J. E., Sumpter D. J. T., Krause J. Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2011) 108:2312–2315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte W. H. Groupthink. Fortune (1952) March):114–117142146Google Scholar