Corporate Strategy, Analyst Coverage, and the Uniqueness Paradox

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1530

References

  • Akerlof G. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84:488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arbel A, Carvel S, Strebel P. Giraffes, institutions, and neglected firms. Financial Analyst J. (1983) 39:57–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker M, Stein J, Wurgler J. When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:969–1005CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B, Lehavy R, McNichols M, Trueman B. Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst recommendations and stock return? J. Finance (2001) 56:531–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B, Lehavy R, McNichols M, Trueman B. Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks' stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts' recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. (2006) 41:87–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1231–1241LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barry C, Brown S. Differential information and the small firm effect. J. Financial Econom. (1984) 13:283–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barth M, Kaznyck R, McNichols M. Analyst coverage and intangible assets. J. Accounting Res. (2001) 39:1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and Internet telephony. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21:42–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berger P, Hann R. The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. J. Accounting Res. (2003) 41:163–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger P, Ofek E. Diversification's effect on firm value. J. Financial Econom. (1995) 37:39–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Schoar A. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:1169–1208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beunza D, Garud R. Calculators, lemmings or frame-makers? The intermediary role of securities analysts. Sociol. Rev. (2007) 55:13–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhushan R. Firm characteristics and analyst following. J. Accounting Econom. (1989) 11:255–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandenburger A, Stuart J. Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1996) 5:5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown L, Richardson G, Schwager S. An information interpretation of financial analyst superiority in forecasting earnings. J. Accounting Res. (1987) 25:49–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campa J, Kedia S. Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance (2002) 57:1731–1762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaffkin J. Monsanto Corporation. (1999) . Research note, November 2, Paine Webber, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Chang X, Dasgupta S, Hilary G. Analyst coverage and financing decisions. J. Finance (2006) 59:3009–3048CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C-Y, Chen PF. NASD Rule 2711 and changes in analysts' independence in making stock recommendations. Accounting Rev. (2009) 84:1041–1071CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derrien F, Kecskes A. The real effects of analyst coverage. (2010) . Working paper, HEC Paris, ParisGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I, Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1504–1511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doukas J, Kim C, Pantzalis C. The two faces of analyst coverage. Financial Management (2005) 34:99–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duru A, Reeb D. International diversification and analyst forecast accuracy and bias. Accounting Rev. (2002) 77:415–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elgers P, Lo M, Pfeiffer R. Delayed security price adjustments to financial analysts' forecasts of annual earnings. Accounting Rev. (2001) 76:613–632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland W, Stevens M. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1998) 24:312–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P. Strategy and the Business Landscape (2005) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gilson S, Healy P, Noe C, Palepu K. Analyst specialization and conglomerate stock breakups. J. Accounting Res. (2001) 39:565–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S, Stiglitz J. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70:393–408Google Scholar
  • Hall B, Liebman J. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113:653–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Healy P, Palepu K. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 31:405–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong H, Kubik J. Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. J. Finance (2003) 58:313–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong H, Lim T, Stein J. Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. J. Finance (2000) 55:265–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard RG. Capita-market imperfections and investment. J. Econom. Literature (1998) 36:193–225Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Zingales L. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112:169–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keynes JM. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936) (MacMillan, Cambridge University Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Lin H, McNichols M. Underwriting relationships, analysts' earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. (1998) 25:101–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S, Rumelt R. The bargaining perspective. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1069–1086CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNichols M, O'Brien P. Self-selection and analyst coverage. J. Accounting Res. (1997) 35:167–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michaely R, Womack K. Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 12:573–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery C, Wernerfelt B. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:623–632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy K, Ashenfelter O, Card D. Executive compensation. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) 3b(Elsevier Science, North Holland) 2485–2563Google Scholar
  • Myers S, Majluf M. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J. Financial Econom. (1984) 13:187–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen M. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22:435–480CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Greve H, Davis G. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. (2001) 46:502–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts D. Georgia Pacific decides to leave the spotlight. Financial Times (2005) November 15):29Google Scholar
  • Rumelt R, Lamb R. Toward a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 556–570Google Scholar
  • Sharfstein D, Stein J. Herd behavior and investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:465–479Google Scholar
  • Stickel S. Common stock returns surrounding earnings forecast revisions: More puzzling evidence. Accounting Rev. (1991) 66:402–416Google Scholar
  • Veldkamp L. Media frenzies in the market for financial information. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96:577–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villalonga B. Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. J. Finance (2004a) 59:475–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villalonga B. Does diversification cause the “diversification discount”? Financial Management (2004b) 33:5–27Google Scholar
  • Womack K. Do brokerage analysts' recommendations have investment value? J. Finance (1996) 54:137–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104:1398–1438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:590–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. Structural incoherence and stock market activity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2004) 69:405–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.