Aspirational Preferences and Their Representation by Risk Measures

References

• Abbas A, Matheson JE, Bordley RF. Effective utility functions induced by organizational target-based incentives. Managerial Decision Econom. (2008) 30(4):235–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Americaine. Econometrica (1953) 21(4):503–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ. A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. (1963) 34(1):199–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D. Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance (1999) 9(3):203–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aumann R, Serrano R. An economic index of riskiness. J. Political Econom. (2008) 116(5):810–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A, L’Haridon O, Placido L. Ambiguity models and the machina paradoxes. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 101(4):1547–1560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley RF, Kirkwood CW. Multiattribute preference analysis with performance targets. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(6):823–835Link, Google Scholar
• Bordley RF, LiCalzi M. Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions Econom. Finance (2000) 23(1):53–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouyssou D, Marchant T. Subjective expected utility without preferences. J. Math. Psych. (2011) 55(6):457–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Sim M. Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):71–84Link, Google Scholar
• Castagnoli E, LiCalzi M. Benchmarking real–valued acts. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 57(2):236–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Montrucchio L. Uncertainty averse preferences. J. Econom. Theory (2011) 146(4):1275–1330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen LG, Long Z. The impact of a target on newsvendor decisions. (2012) . Working paper, NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Chen L, He S, Zhang S. Tight bounds for some risk measures, with applications to robust portfolio selection. Oper. Res. (2011) 59(4):847–865Link, Google Scholar
• Cherny A, Madan D. New measures of performance evaluation. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22(7):2571–2606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dass N, Massa M, Patgiri R. Mutual funds and bubbles: The surprising role of contractual incentives. Rev. Financial Stud. (2008) 21(1):51–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E, van de Ven J. Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2008) 49(2):683–700Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drapeau S, Kupper M. Risk preferences and their robust representations. (2009) . Working paper, Humboldt University, BerlinGoogle Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75(4):643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1977) 67(2):116–126Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Knispel T. Entropic risk measures: Coherence vs. convexity, model ambiguity, and robust large deviations. Stochastics Dynam. (2011) 11(2–3):1–19Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A. Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochastics (2002) 6(4):429–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A. Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time (2004) (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster DP, Hart S. An operational measure of riskiness. J. Political Econom. (2009) 117(5):785–814Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M. Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory (2004) 118(2):133–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. (1987) 16(1):65–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. Maximin expected utility theory with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18(2):141–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh J, Sim M. Robust optimization made easy with ROME. Oper. Res. (2011) 59(4):973–985Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanzilotti RF. Pricing objectives in large companies. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1958) 48(5):921–940Google Scholar
• Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A. Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica (2006) 74(6):1447–1498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina M. Risk, ambiguity, and the rank dependence axioms. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(1):385–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mao JCT. Survey of capital budgeting: Theory and practice. J. Finance (1970) 25(2):349–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418Link, Google Scholar
• Nemirovski A, Shapiro A. Convex approximations of chance constrained programs. SIAM J. Optim. (2006) 17(4):969–996Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW. It is whether you win or lose: The importance of the overall probabilities of winning or losing in risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty (2005) 30(1):5–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Laughhunn DJ, Crum R. Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. (1980) 26(10):1039–1060Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Laughhunn DJ, Crum R. Further tests of aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. (1981) 27(8):953–958Link, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, Zabarankin M. Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Finance Stochastics (2006) 10(1):51–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy A. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica (1952) 20:431–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ. The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica (1989) 57(3):571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69(1):99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Markle AB. An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1322–1335Link, Google Scholar