When Does It Pay to Delay Supplier Qualification? Theory and Experiments

References

• Ausubel LM, Cramton P, Dimitri N, Piga G, Spagnolo G. Dynamic auctions in procurement. Handbook of Procurement (2006) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 220–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Bergstrom T. Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory (2005) 26(2):445–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beall S, Carter C, Carter PL, Germer T, Hendrick T, Jap SD, Kaufmann L, Maciejewski D, Monczka R, Petersen K. The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. (2003) . White paper, Center for Advanced Procurement Studies Research, Tempe, AZ. Accessed June 14, 2012, http://www.capsresearch.org/publications/pdfs-public/beall2003es.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Bichler M. An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems (2000) 29(3):249–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN. An experimental investigation of the seller incentives in the EPA’s emission trading auction. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(4):905–922Google Scholar
• Chen-Ritzo C-H, Harrison TP, Kwasnica AM, Thomas DJ. Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. (2005) 51(12):1753–1762Link, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Smith VL, Walker JM. Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 1(1):61–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Silva DG, Dunne T, Kosmopoulou G. An empirical analysis of entrant and incumbent bidding in road construction auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2003) 51(3):295–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby WJ. Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):350–371Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E. E-sourcing in procurement: Theory and behavior in reverse auctions with noncompetitive contracts. Management Sci. (2006) 52(4):581–596Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E. Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory (2007) 33(1):81–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E. Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):808–819Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Katok E. A direct test of risk aversion and regret in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):75–86Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Haruvy E, Katok E. A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):629–641Link, Google Scholar
• Filiz-Ozbay E, Ozbay EY. Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1407–1418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(2):171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac R, James D. Just who are you calling risk averse? J. Risk Uncertainty (2000) 20(2):177–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap SD. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Kagel JH, Roth AE. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 501–585Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Levin D. Independent private value auctions: Bidder behaviour in first-, second-, and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Econom. J. (1993) 103(419):868–879Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Levin D. Common Value Auctions and the Winner’s Curse. (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna V. Auction Theory (2009) 2nd ed.(Academic Press, Burlington, MA) Google Scholar
• Kulp SL, Randall T. Procurement at Betapharm Corp. (A, B, C). (2005) . HBS Case 9-105-30, 31, 32. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Li C, Debo L. Second sourcing versus sole sourcing with capacity investment and asymmetric information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009a) 11(3):448–470Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Debo L. Strategic dynamic sourcing from competing suppliers with transferable capacity investment. Naval Res. Logist. (2009b) 56(6):540–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J. Asymmetric auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67(3):413–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tunca TI, Wu DJ, Zhong F. An empirical analysis of price, quality, and incumbency in service procurement auctions. (2010) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census Statistics for industry groups and industries: 2004—Annual survey of manufactures. (2005) . Accessed June 14, 2012, http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/am0431gs1.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Wan Z, Beil DR. RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(4):934–949Link, Google Scholar
• Zhong F. Empirical analysis of online procurement auctions: Business value, bidding behavior, learning and incumbent effect. (2007) . Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Zhou N. Bidding between incumbent and entrant. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(3):295–303Crossref, Google Scholar