Empirical Investigation of Retail Expansion and Cannibalization in a Dynamic Environment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1540

References

  • Akcura TM, Gonul F, Petrova E. Consumer learning and brand valuation: An application on over-the-counter (OTC) Drugs. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):156–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Assmus G, Farley J, Lehmann D. How advertising affects sales: A meta-analysis of econometric results. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(1):65–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Ho T-H, Tang CS. Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):352–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry ST. Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica (1992) 60(4):889–917CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Reiss PC. Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(5):977–1009CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Craig CS, Ghosh A, McLafferty S. Models of the retail location process: A review. J. Retailing (1984) 60(1):5–36Google Scholar
  • Datta S, Sudhir K, Talukdar D. A structural model of entry and location choice: The differentiation-agglomeration tradeoff. (2008) . Working Paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Davis P. Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):964–982CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P, Srinivasan K. Demand signalling under unobservable effort in franchising: Linear and nonlinear price contracts. Management Sci. (1995) 41(10):1608–1623LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Draganska M, Jain DC. A likelihood approach to estimating market equilibrium models. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):605–616LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dube JP, Hitsch G, Manchanda P. An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(2):107–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans WN, Froeb LM, Werden GJ. Endogeneity in the concentration-price relationship: Causes, consequences and cures. J. Indust. Econom. (1993) 41(4):431–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fotheringham AS. Statistical modeling of spatial choice: An overview. Res. Marketing (1991) 5(Supplement 5):95–117Google Scholar
  • Ghosh A, Craig CS. An approach to determining optimal locations for new services. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(4):354–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huff D. Defining and estimating a Trading Area. J. Marketing (1964) 28(July):34–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huff DL, Batsell RR. Delimiting the areal extent of a market area. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(4):581–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jedidi K, Mela CF, Gupta S. Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins A. Hamburger prices and spatial econometrics. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2003) 12(4):591–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins A. An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment within franchised and company-owned branded chains. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):476–489LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufmann PJ, Rangan VK. A model for managing system conflict during franchise expansion. J. Retailing (1990) 66(2):155–173Google Scholar
  • Kiley D. Car dealers are fighting the hammer as chrysler and GM send out pink slips to retailers. Bus. Week (2009) May 13Google Scholar
  • Kiviat B. Starbucks goes from venti to grande. Time (2008) July 2Google Scholar
  • Kumar V, Leone RP. Measuring the effect of retail store promotions on brand and store substitution. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(2):178–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lodish LM, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME. A summary of fifty-five in-market experimental estimates of the long-term effects of TV advertising. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G133–G140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manuszak M, Moul C. Prices and endogenous market structure in office supply superstores. J. Indust. Econom. (2008) 56(1):94–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naik PA, Mantrala MK, Sawyer AG. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):214–235LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naik PA, Raman K, Winer R. Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interaction effects. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):25–34LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nair S, Tikoo S, Liu S. Valuing exclusivity from encroachment in franchising. J. Retailing (2009) 85(2):206–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neelamegham R, Chintagunta P. Modeling and forecasting of sales in technology products. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(3):195–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica (2001) 69(2):307–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putsis WP. Parameter variation and new product diffusion. J. Forecasting (1998) 17(3–4):231–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quelch J. Starbucks’ lessons for premium brands. (2008) . HBS Working Knowledge (July 9), http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5973.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Reilly W. The Law of Retail Gravitation (1931) (Putnam, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rust RT, Donthu N. Capturing geographically localized misspecification error in retail choice models. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):103–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seim K. An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):619–640CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh V, Zhu T. Pricing and market concentration in oligopoly markets. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):1020–1035LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sriram S, Kalwani M. Optimal advertising and promotion budgets in dynamic markets with brand equity as a mediating variable. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):46–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sriram S, Chintagunta P, Neelamegham R. Effects of brand preference, product attributes, and marketing mix variables in technology product markets. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):440–456LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sudhir K, Chintagunta PK, Kadiyali V. Time-varying competition. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):96–109LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomadsen R. The effect of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated industries. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(4):908–929Google Scholar
  • van Heerde H, Mela C, Manchanda P. The dynamic effect of innovation on market structure. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(2):166–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J, Song XM, Sirbu M, Wang Q. Kalman filter estimation of new product diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 35(3):378–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.