Men Too Sometimes Shy Away from Competition: The Case of Team Competition

References

• Altonji J, Blank R, Ashenfelter O, Card D. Race and gender in the labor market. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) 3(Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) 3144–3259Google Scholar
• Anker R. Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world. (1998) . Technical report, International Labor Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock K. The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2001) 55(1):3–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth A, Nolen P. Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2012) 81(2):542–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornstein G, Yaniv I. Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: Are groups more “rational” players? Experiment. Econom. (1998) 1(1):109–118Google Scholar
• Cason T, Mui V-L. A laboratory study of group polarization in the team dictator game. Econom. J. (1997) 107(444):1465–1483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Jackson M. The role of responsibility in strategic risk-taking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2009) 69(3):241–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A. Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1340–1352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX. Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(1):431–457Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Kagel J. Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(3):477–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Hayne CS. Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents? Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(3):209–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature (2009) 47(2):448–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta Gupta N, Poulsen A, Villeval M-C. Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Economic Inquiry (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• De la Rica S, Dolado J, Llorens V. Ceilings or floors? Gender wage gaps by education in Spain. Population Econom. (2008) 21(3):751–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W. Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. (2009) . Discussion Paper 2009-069/1, Tinbergen Institute, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P. Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Econom. J. (1998) 108(448):726–735Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Econom. Inquiry (2001) 39(2):171–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P, Plott C, Smith V. Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results (2008) 1(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 509–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List J. Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on gender differences in job-entry decisions. (2010) . NBER Working Paper 16546, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Fox R, Lawless J. Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. Amer. J. Political Sci. (2004) 48(2):264–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard K, List J. Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica (2009) 77(5):1637–1664Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A. Performance in competitive enviromnents: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(3):1049–1074Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):715–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Kremer K, Macho V. An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen—GWDG-Bericht (2004) 63(Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany) 79–93Google Scholar
• Healy A, Pate J. Can teams help to close the gender competition gap? Econom. J. (2011) 121(555):1192–1204Google Scholar
• Ivanova-Stenzel R, Kübler D. Gender differences in team work and team competition. J. Econom. Psych. (2011) 32(5):797–808Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keser C, Montmarquette C. Voluntary versus enforced team effort. Games (2011) 2(3):277–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kocher M, Sutter M. The decision maker matters: Individual versus group behaviour in experimental beauty-contest games. Econom. J. (2005) 115(500):200–223Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Villeval M-C. Do women prefer a co-operative work environment? (2011) . I2A Discussion Paper 5999, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, GermanyCrossref, Google Scholar
• Luhan W, Kocher M, Sutter M. Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered. Experiment. Econom. (2009) 12(1):26–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(3):1067–1101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L. Gender and competition. Ann. Rev. Econom. (2011) 3(1):601–630Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L. How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. (2012) . ePub ahead of print September 21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1602Google Scholar
• Ortmann A, Tichy L. Gender differences in the laboratory: Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1999) 39(3):327–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockenbach B, Sadrieh A, Mathauschek B. Teams take the better risks. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(3):412–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shupp R, Williams A. Risk preference differentials of small groups and individual. Econom. J. (2007) 118(525):258–283Google Scholar
• Sutter M. Individual behavior and group membership: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(5):2247–2257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific Amer. (1970) 223(5):96–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeiliger R. A presentation of REGATE, Internet based software for experimental economics. (2000) . http://www.gate.cnrs.fr/~zeiliger/regate/RegateIntro.pptGoogle Scholar