Robust Storage Assignment in Unit-Load Warehouses

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1543

References

  • Adida E, Perakis G. A robust optimization approach to dynamic pricing and inventory control with no backorders. Math. Programming (2006) 107(1–2):97–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Zhang M. Two-stage robust network flow and design under demand uncertainty. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(4):662–673LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartholdi JJ, Hackman ST. Warehouse and Distribution Science (2007) (Supply Chain & Logistics Institute, Atlanta) . Accessed July 4, 2012, http://www.warehouse-science.com/Google Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23(4):769–805LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust solutions to uncertain programs. Oper. Res. Let. (1999) 25(1):1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math. Programming (2000) 88(3):411–424CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Golany B, Nemirovski A, Vial J. Supplier-retailer flexible commitments contracts: A robust optimization approach. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(3):248–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Goryashko A, Guslitzer E, Nemirovski A. Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Math. Programming (2004) 99(2):351–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Sim M. Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math. Programming (2003) 98(1–3):49–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Sim M. The price of robustness. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(1):35–53LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Thiele A. A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(1):150–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Iancu DA, Parrilo PA. Optimality of affine policies in multistage robust optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (2010) 35(2):363–394LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Pachamanova D, Sim M. Robust linear optimization under general norms. Oper. Res. Lett. (2003) 32(6):510–516CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W, Sim M. Goal driven optimization. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(2):342–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X, Sim M, Sun P, Zhang J. A linear decision-based approximation approach to stochastic programming. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(2):344–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Koster R, Le-Duc T, Roodbergen KJ. Design and control of warehouse order-picking: A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 182(2):481–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Ghaoui L, Lebret H. Robust solutions to least-square problems to uncertain data matrices. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. (1997) 18(4):1035–1064CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El-Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebret H. Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 9(1):33–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdoğan E, Iyengar G. Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization. Math. Programming (2006) 107(1–2):37–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erera AL, Morales JC, Savelsbergh M. Robust optimization for empty repositioning problems. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(2):468–483LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eynan A, Rosenblatt MJ. Establishing zones in single-command class-based rectangular AS/RS. IIE Trans. (1994) 26(1):38–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. Maximin expected utility theory with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18(2):141–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goetschalckx M, Ratliff HD. Shared storage policies based on the duration stay of unit loads. Management Sci. (1990) 36(9):1120–1132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goh J, Sim M. Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(4):902–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goh J, Sim M. Robust optimization made easy with ROME. Oper. Res. (2011) 59(4):973–985LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graves SC, Hausman WH, Schwarz LB. Storage-retrieval interleaving in automatic warehousing systems. Management Sci. (1977) 23(9):935–945LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gu J, Goetschalckx M, McGinnis LF. Research on warehouse operation: A comprehensive review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 177(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman WH, Schwarz LB, Graves SC. Optimal storage assignment in automatic warehousing systems. Management Sci. (1976) 22(6):629–638LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heskett JL. Cube-per-order index: A key to warehouse stock location. Transportation Distribution Management (1963) 3:27–31Google Scholar
  • Heskett JL. Putting the cube-per-order index to work in warehouse layout. Transportation Distribution Management (1964) 4:23–30Google Scholar
  • Kulturel S, Ozdemirel NE, Sepil C, Bozkurt Z. Experimental investigation of shared storage assignment policies in automated storage/retrieval systems. IIE Trans. (1999) 31(8):739–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mallette AJ, Francis RL. A generalized assignment approach to optimal facility layout. AIIE Trans. (1972) 4(2):144–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malmborg CJ, Bhaskaran K. A revised proof of optimality for the cube-per-order index rule for stored item location. Appl. Math. Model. (1990) 14(2):87–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roodbergen KJ, Vis IFA. A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 194(2):343–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblatt MJ, Eynan A. Deriving the optimal boundaries for class-based automatic storage/retrieval systems. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1519–1524LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz LB, Graves SC, Hausman WH. Scheduling policies for automatic warehousing systems: Simulation results. AIIE Trans. (1978) 10(3):260–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • See C, Sim M. Robust approximation to multi-period inventory management. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(3):583–594LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soyster AL. Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper. Res. (1973) 21(5):1154–1157LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thonemann UW, Brandeau ML. Note. Optimal storage assignment policies for automated storage and retrieval systems with stochastic demands. Management Sci. (1998) 44(1):142–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Berg JP. A literature survey on planning and control of warehousing systems. IIE Trans. (1999) 31(8):751–762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.