The Behavioralist Visits the Factory: Increasing Productivity Using Simple Framing Manipulations

References

• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. Economics and Identity. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):715–753Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. Identity, supervision, and work groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(2):212–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I. Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. (2005) 120(3):917–962Google Scholar
• Bellemare C, Shearer B. Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Games Econom. Behav. (2009) 67(1):233–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J, Ashenfelter O, Card D. Human resource management and productivity. Handbook of Labor Economics (2010) 4B(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1697–1767Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lim N, Ahearne M. Should managers use team-based contests? An experimental study. (2011) . Working paper, University of Wisconsin–Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
• Cheng P-Y, Chiou W-B. Framing effects in group investment decision making: Role of group polarization. Psych. Rep. (2008) 102(1):283–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choe H, Eom Y. The disposition effect and investment performance in the futures market. J. Futures Markets (2009) 29(6):496–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R, Zhu N. Up close and personal: Investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):726–740Link, Google Scholar
• Dickinson D. The carrot vs. the stick in work team motivation. Experiment. Econom. (2001) 4:107–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Hollard G. Reconsidering the effect of market experience on the “endowment effect.”. Econometrica (2010) 78(6):2005–2019Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng L, Seasholes MS. Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Rev. Finance (2005) 9(3):305–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Orzen H, Renner E, Starmer C. Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2009) 70(3):443–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA. Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica (2006) 74(5):1365–1384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Huffman D, Fehr E. Loss aversion and labor supply. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2004) 2(2):216–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Nagel S. Inexperienced investors and bubbles. J. Financial Econom. (2009) 93(2):239–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haigh MS, List JA. Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance (2005) 60(1):521–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H. Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. (2003) 111:465–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan RL, Hoffman VB, Moser DV, Rapoport A, Zwick R. Bonus versus penalty: Does contract frame affect employee effort? Experimental Business Research (2005) II(Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 151–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanneman M. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(3):635–647Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA. Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature (2004) 42(4):1009–1055Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Schmidt H, Rockenbach B, Sadrieh A. In search of workers’ real effort reciprocity—A field and a laboratory experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2010) 8(4):817–837Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kermer DA, Driver-Linn E, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT. Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(8):649–653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohn A. Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes (1993) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Landa JT, Wang XT. Bounded rationality of economic man: Decision making under ecological, social, and institutional constraints. J. Bioeconomics (2001) 3(2):217–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Rupp NG. Retracting a gift: How does employee effort respond to wage reductions? J. Labor Econom. (2007) 25(4):725–762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt S, List JA. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspect. (2007) 21(2):153–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(1):41–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA. Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica (2004) 72(2):615–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? The case of exogenous market experience. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(3):313–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision-making. Health Psych. (2005) 24(4):S49–S56Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon KR, Larsson S, Allais M, Hagen O. Utility theory: Axioms versus paradoxes. The Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox (1979) (D. Riedel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 333–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A. Pay, reference points, and policy performance. Quart. J. Econom. (2006) 121(3):783–821Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E. Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(1):112–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElroy T, Seta JJ. Does it matter if it involves my group? How the importance of collective-esteem influences a group-based framing task. Soc. Cognition (2006) 24(4):496–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munro A, Ferreira De Sousa Y. Truck, barter and exchange versus the endowment effect: Virtual field experiments in an online game environment. J. Econom. Psych. (2012) 33(3):482–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paese PW, Bieser M, Tubbs ME. Framing effects and choice shifts in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 56(1):149–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Schweitzer ME. Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(1):129–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty (1988) 1(1):7–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seru A, Shumway T, Stoffman N. Learning by trading. Rev. Financial Stud. (2010) 23(2):705–739Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi L. Incentive effects of piece rate contracts: Evidence from two small field experiments. Topics Econom. Anal. Policy (2010) 10(1). Article 61Google Scholar
• Stoddard JE, Fern EF. Buying group choice: The effect of individual group member’s prior decision frame. Psych. Marketing (2002) 19(1):59–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Syverson C. What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature (2011) 49(2):326–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1(1):39–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):1039–1061Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven J. Framing contracts. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (2012) 168(1):89–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Hsee C. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Sci. (1998) 44(9):1205–1217Link, Google Scholar