On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off

References

• Airlines for America Annual and per-minute cost of delays to U.S. airlines. (2011) . Accessed November 2011, http://www.airlines.org/Pages/Annual-and-Per-Minute-Cost-of-Delays-to-U.S.-Airlines.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Armony M, Ward AR. Fair dynamic routing in large-scale heterogeneous-server systems. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(3):624–637Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ. Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (1965) (Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, Helsinki, Finland) Google Scholar
• Atkinson AB. On the measurement of inequality. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2(3):244–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnhart C, Bertsimas D, Caramanis C, Fearing D. Equitable and efficient coordination in traffic flow management. Transportation Sci. (2012) 46(2):262–280Link, Google Scholar
• Barr N. The Economics of the Welfare State (1987) (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London) Google Scholar
• Bergson A. A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. Quart. J. Econom. (1938) 52(2):310–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas D, Gallager R. Data Networks (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Gupta S. On fairness and collaboration in network air traffic flow management: An optimization approach. (2012) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Stock-Patterson S. The air traffic flow management problem with enroute capacities. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(3):406–422Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N. The price of fairness. Oper. Res. (2011) 59(1):17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N. Fairness, efficiency, and flexibility in organ allocation for kidney transplantation. Oper. Res. (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Paschalidis IC, Tsitsiklis JN. Optimization of multiclass queuing networks: Polyhedral and nonlinear characterizations of achievable performance. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1994) 4(1):43–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bisias D, Lo A, Watkins J. Estimating the NIH efficient frontier. PLoS ONE (2012) 7(5):e34569Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonald T, Massoulié L. Impact of fairness on Internet performance. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. (2001) 29(1):82–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler M, Williams HP. Fairness versus efficiency in charging for the use of common facilities. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2002) 53(12):1324–1329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callahan D, Wasunna AA. Medicine and the Market: Equity v. Choice (2006) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty D, Goel G, Vazirani VV, Wang L, Yu C. Some computational and game-theoretic issues in Nash and nonsymmetric bargaining games. (2009) . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Chan CW, Armony M, Bambos N. Fairness in overloaded parallel queues. (2012a) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Chan CW, Farias VF, Bambos N, Escobar GJ. Maximizing throughput of hospital intensive care units with patient readmissions. Oper. Res. (2012b) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Correa JR, Schulz AS, Stier-Moses NE. Fast, fair, and efficient flows in networks. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(2):215–225Link, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ. Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1303–1314Link, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Groenevelt H. M/G/c queueing systems with multiple customer classes: Characterization and control of achievable performance under nonpreemptive priority rules. Management Sci. (1988) 34(9):1121–1138Link, Google Scholar
• Gelenbe E, Mitrani L. Analysis and Synthesis of Computer Systems (1980) (Academic, London) Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Political Econom. (1955) 63(4):309–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E, Smorodinsky M. Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica (1975) 43(3):513–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly FP, Maulloo A, Tan D. Rate control for communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness, and stability. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1998) 49(3):237–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lan T, Kao D, Chiang M, Sabharwal A. An axiomatic theory of fairness in network resource allocation. INFOCOM’10 Proc. 29th Conf. on Inform. Comm. (2010) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 1343–1351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lensberg T. Stability and the Nash solution. J. Econom. Theory (1988) 45(2):330–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR. Microeconomic Theory (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mo J, Walrand J. Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2000) 8(5):556–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18(2):155–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odoni AR, Bianco L. Flow Control of Congested Networks, Chapter the Flow Management Problem in Air Traffic Control (1987) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauly MV. Avoiding side effects in implementing health insurance reform. New England J. Medicine (2010) 362(8):671–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW. Risk aversion in the small and large. Econometrica (1964) 32(1/2):122–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls J. A Theory of Justice (1971) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick DB. Setting biomedical research priorities in the 21st century. Virtual Mentor (2003) 5(7). http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2003/07/msoc1-0307.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Roth A. Axiomatic Models of Bargaining (1979) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. Foundations of Economic Analysis (1947) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sen A, Foster JE. On Economic Inequality (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Shreedhar M, Varghese G. Efficient fair queueing using deficit round-robin. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (1996) 4(3):375–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios SA. Patient choice in kidney allocation: The role of the queueing discipline. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2004) 6(4):280–301Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios SA. Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: A mechanism design model. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1647–1660Link, Google Scholar
• Swenson MD. Scarcity in the intensive care unit: Principles of justice for rationing ICU beds. Amer. J. Medicine (1992) 92(5):551–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang A, Wang J, Low SH. Counter-intuitive throughput behaviors in networks under end-to-end control. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2006) 14(2):355–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoucas P. The region of achievable performance in a model of Klimov. (1991) . Research Report RC16543, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
• Vossen T, Ball M, Hoffman R. A general approach to equity in traffic flow management and its application to mitigating exemption bias in ground delay programs. Air Traffic Control Quart. (2003) 11(4):277–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagstaff A. QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. J. Health Econom. (1991) 10(1):21–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Loch CH, Van der Heyden L. A model of fair process and its limits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):637–653Link, Google Scholar
• Young PH. Equity: In Theory and Practice (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar