Collaborative Cost Reduction and Component Procurement Under Information Asymmetry

References

• Aberdeen Group The product lifecycle collaboration benchmark report: The product profitability “X factor”? (2006) . Report, Aberdeen Group, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Anderson E, Jap SD. The dark side of close relationships. Sloan Management Rev. (2005) 46(3):75–82Google Scholar
• Aviv Y. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1326–1343Link, Google Scholar
• Aviv Y. On the benefits of collaborative forecasting partnerships between retailers and manufacturers. Management Sci. (2007) 53(5):777–794Link, Google Scholar
• Baiman S, Fischer PE, Rajan MV. Information, contracting, and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):776–789Link, Google Scholar
• Baron DP, Besanko D. Monitoring, moral hazard, asymmetric information, and risk sharing in procurement contracting. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(4):509–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M. Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Kök AG. Dynamic cost reduction through process improvement in assembly networks. Management Sci. (2009) 55(4):552–567Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V. Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. (2009) 55(7):1152–1169Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya S, Lafontaine F. Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of shared contracts. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(4):761–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchard BS. Design and Manage to Life Cycle Cost (1978) (M/A Press, Portland, OR) Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming (1997) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Chen F. Salesforce incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):60–75Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Blackburn JD, Van Wassenhove LN. Partnerships to improve supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(4):71–82Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Zhou D, Tang CS. Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):550–559Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH. Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gilbert SM, Cvsa V. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 150(3):617–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha AY. Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. (2001) 48(1):41–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handfield RB, Ragatz GL, Petersen KJ, Monczka RM. Involving suppliers in new product development. Calif. Management Rev. (1999) 42(1):59–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer AV, Schwarz LB, Zenios SA. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119Link, Google Scholar
• Kaya M, Özer Ö. Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information. Naval Res. Logist. (2009) 56(7):669–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S-H, Swinney R. Product quality choice and inventory risk with strategic consumers. (2011) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Kinni TB. America's Best: IndustryWeek's Guide to World-Class Manufacturing Plants (1996) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostamis D, Duenyas I. Purchasing under asymmetric demand and cost information: When is more private information better? Oper. Res. (2011) 59(4):914–928Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Loch CH. A retrospective look at production and operations management articles on new product development. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(4):433–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich KT. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J. Using cost observation to regulate firms. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(3):614–641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lariviere MA, Porteus EL. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):293–305Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Whang S. The impact of the secondary market on the supply chain. Management Sci. (2002) 48(6):719–731Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1875–1886Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Debo LG. Second sourcing vs. sole sourcing with capacity investment and asymmetric information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(3):448–470Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS. Optimal mechanisms with finite agent types. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):788–803Link, Google Scholar
• McMillan J. Managing suppliers: Incentive systems in Japanese and U.S. industry. Calif. Management Rev. (1990) 32(4):38–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):61–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nellore R, Soderquist K, Siddall G, Motwani J. Specifications—Do we really understand what they mean? Bus. Horizons (1999) 42(6):63–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen K-Y. Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. (2011) 57(6):1111–1137Link, Google Scholar
• Pyke DF, Johnson ME, Harrison TP, Lee HL, Neale JJ. Sourcing strategy and supplier relationships: Alliances vs. eProcurement. The Practice of Supply Chain Management: Where Theory and Application Converge (2003) (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA) 77–89Google Scholar
• Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Petersen KJ. Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. J. Bus. Res. (2002) 55(5):389–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Karmarkar US, Carr S. Contracting for collaborative services. Management Sci. (2010) 56(5):849–863Link, Google Scholar
• Rudzki R. The advantage of partnering well. Supply Chain Management Rev. (2004) 8(2):44–51Google Scholar
• Stallkamp TT. SCORE! A Better Way to Do Business: Moving from Conflict to Collaboration (2005) (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Taylor TA. Sale timing in a supply chain: When to sell to the retailer. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(1):23–42Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (2003) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D. The Machine That Changed the World (1991) (Harper-Perennial, New York) Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zenios S. A dynamic principal-agent model with hidden information: Sequential optimality through truthful state revelation. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(3):681–696Link, Google Scholar