Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community

References

• Allison PD. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS (2005) (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) Google Scholar
• Amabile T, Staw B, Cummings L. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1988) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 123–167Google Scholar
• Amabile T. Creativity in Context (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Andrew JP, Manget J, Michael DC, Taylor A, Zablit H. Innovation 2010: A return to prominence and the emergence of a new world order. (2010) . Report, Boston Consulting Group, Bethesda, MD. Accessed July 11, 2010, http://www.bcg.com/documents/file42620.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Audia P, Goncalo J. Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):1–15Link, Google Scholar
• Backstrom L, Kumar R, Marlow C, Novak J, Tomkins A. Preferential behavior in online groups. Proc. Internat. Conf. Web Search and Web Data Mining (2008) (ACM, New York) 117–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birch H, Rabinowitz H. The negative effect of previous experience on productive thinking. J. Experiment. Psych. (1951) 41(2):121–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjelland O, Wood R. An inside view of IBM's “Innovation Jam”. Sloan Management Rev. (2008) 50(1):32–40Google Scholar
• Bostwick W. Starbucks sponsors coffee-cup redesign contest. New York Times (2010) March 16). http://www.fastcompany.com/1585666/starbucks-sponsors-coffee-cup-redesign-contestGoogle Scholar
• Boudreau K, Lacetera N, Lakhani K. Incentives and uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2011) 57(5):843–863Link, Google Scholar
• Boutin P. Crowdsourcing: Consumers as creators. Business Week (2006) July 13). http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/jul2006/id20060713_755844.htmGoogle Scholar
• Bullinger A, Neyer A, Rass M, Moeslein K. Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management (2010) 19(3):290–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burroughs J, Moreau CP, Mick D, Haugtvedt C, Herr P, Kardes F. Toward a psychology of consumer creativity. Handbook of Consumer Psychology (2008) (Erlbaum, New York) 1011–1038Google Scholar
• Cameron A, Trivedi P. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (2009) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cardoso C, Badke-Schaub P. Editorial—Fixation or inspiration: Creative problem solving in design. J. Creative Behav. (2011) 45(2):77–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chrysikou E, Weisberg R. Following the wrong foot-steps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory and Cognition (2005) 31(5):1134–1148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Gambardella A, Mariani M. Learning to be Edison? Individual inventive experience and breakthrough inventions. (2010) Presentation, DRUID Summer ConferenceJune 16–18(Imperial College London Business School, London) . Accessed June 10, 2011, http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=501970&cf=43Google Scholar
• Cramer M, Franses P, Slagter E. Censored regression analysis in large samples with many zero observations. (1999) . Research Report 9939/A, Econometric Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Accessed October 7, 2011, http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1608/feweco19991109155424.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Czarnitzki D, Hussinger K, Schneider C. Wacky patents meet economic indicators. Econom. Lett. (2011) 113(2):131–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl A, Lawrence J, Pierce J. Building an innovation community. Res.-Tech. Management (2011) 54(5):19–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl D, Moreau P. The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(1):47–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dell_Admin1 Who makes decisions about ideas on IdeaStorm? How does is all work? (2007) . Accessed March 12, 2010, http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaView?id=0877000000008o2AAAGoogle Scholar
• Di Gangi P, Wasko M. Steal my idea! organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems (2009) 48(1):303–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Gangi P, Wasko M, Hooker R. Getting customers' ideas to work for you: Learning from Dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quart. Executive (2010) 9(4):213–228Google Scholar
• Dugosh K, Paulus P. Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2005) 41(3):313–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dugosh K, Paulus P, Roland E, Yang H. Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79(5):722–735Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncker K. On problem solving. Psych. Monographs (1945) 58(5):1–110Google Scholar
• Elliott S. Starbucks hopes there is no Java Jive from contest. New York Times (2010) June 17). http://www.mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/starbucks-hopes-there-is-no-java-jive-from-contest-results/?scp=1&sq=jovoto&st=cseGoogle Scholar
• Ernst H, Leptien C, Vitt J. Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47(2):184–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Szigety M. Exploring the tail of creativity: An evolutionary model of breakthrough invention. Adv. Strategic Management (2006) 23:335–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, von Hippel E, Schreier M. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. J. Product Innovation Management (2006) 23(4):301–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman R, Fishbach S, Forster A, Werth L. Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Res. J. (2003) 15(2/3):277–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuller J. Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. Calif. Management Rev. (2010) 52(2):98–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrison D, Anderson R, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Amer. J. Distance Ed. (2001) 15(1):7–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J. Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. (2007) 1(1):439–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• German T, Barrett H. Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psych. Sci. (2005) 16(1):1–5Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich K. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. (2010) 56(4):591–605Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Lehmann D, Mazursky D. The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):69–84Link, Google Scholar
• Guilford J. The Nature of Human Intelligence (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D, Klein K. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1199–1228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J, Tellis G, Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):687–717Link, Google Scholar
• Hinsz V, Tindale R, Vollrath D. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121(1):43–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business (2008) (Crown Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Jansson D, Smith S. Design fixation. Design Stud. (1991) 12(1):3–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaruzelski B, Dehoff K. The global 1000: How the top innovators keep winning. Strategy + Bus. (2010) 61(Winter):1–14Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L, Lakhani K. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(5):1016–1033Link, Google Scholar
• Jervis C. (2010) . Personal email communication with the author on May 3Google Scholar
• Jouret G. Inside Cisco's search for the next big idea. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2009) 87(9):43–45Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Sommer S. The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):1899–1913Link, Google Scholar
• Killian V. (2009) “IdeaStorm,” presentation during PDMA Carolinas panel on “What the crowd can do for you: Crowdsourcing and wisdom of crowds”April 23Google Scholar
• Kohn N, Smith S. Collaborative fixation: Effects of others' ideas on brainstorming. Appl. Cognitive Psych. (2011) 25(3):359–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohn N, Paulus P, Choi Y. Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2011) 47(3):554–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish L, Ulrich K. Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. (2011) 57(1):107–128Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich K. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt T. Creativity is not enough. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1963) 41(3):72–83Google Scholar
• Linsey J, Teng I, Fu K, Cagan J, Wood K, Schuun C. A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J. Mechanical Design (2010) 132(4):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsley D, Brass D, Thomas J. Efficacy-performing spirals: A multi-level analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):645–678Google Scholar
• Lotka A. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J. Washington Acad. Sci. (1926) 16(12):317–323Google Scholar
• Magnusson P. Exploring the contributions of involving ordinary users in ideation of technology-based services. J. Product Innovation Management (2009) 26(5):578–593Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier N. Reasoning in humans. J. Comparative Psych. (1931) 12(2):181–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Marsh R, Landau J. Item availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagarism. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory and Cognition (1995) 21(6):1568–1582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh R, Landau JJ, Hicks J. How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory and Cognition (1996) 24(3):669–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh R, Ward T, Landau J. The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory and Cognition (1999) 27(1):94–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menchaca L. Dell offers three consumer systems with Ubuntu 7.04. Direct2Dell (2007) May 24). http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/Direct2Dell/b/direct2dell/archive/2007/05/24/15994.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Mumford M, Gustafson S. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(1):27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad B, Stroebe W. How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2006) 20(3):186–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad B, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx H. Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2002) 38(6):535–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn A. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking (1953) (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Park Y, Fader P. Modeling browsing behavior at multiple websites. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):280–303Link, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):85–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J, Shalley C. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perttula M, Liikkanen L. Exposure effects in design idea generation: Unconscious conformity or a product of sampling probability? NordDesign (2006) August 16–18). http://i.org.helsinki.fi/lassial/files/publications/071209-Exposure_effects_in_design.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Perttula M, Sipila P. The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. J. Engrg. Design (2007) 18(1):93–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poetz M, Schreier M. The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J. Product Innovation Management (2012) 29(2):245–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D. The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Comput. Human Behav. (2004) 20(2):201–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purcell A, Gero J. Effects of examples on the results of a design activity. Knowledge-Based Systems (1992) 5(1):82–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purcell A, Gero J. Design and other types of fixation. Design Stud. (1996) 17(4):363–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel E, Nijstad B, Stroebe W. Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2007) 43(6):933–946Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel E, Nijstad B, Stroebe W. The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British J. Psych. (2010) 101(1):47–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson A, Schroeder D. Big results from small ideas. Indust. Management (2005) 47(3). Accessed April 12, 2012, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3081/is_3_47/ai_n29202280/Google Scholar
• Schellens T, Valcke M. Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Comput. Human Behav. (2005) 21(6):957–975Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze A, Hoegl M. Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach. Res. Policy (2008) 37(10):1742–1750Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley C, Zhou J, Oldham G. Effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30(6):933–958Google Scholar
• Shah S. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1000–1014Link, Google Scholar
• Silverberg G, Verspagen B. The size distribution of innovations revisited: An application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance. J. Econometrics (2007) 139(2):318–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman R. For bright ideas, ask the staff. Wall Street Journal (2011) October 17). http://www.online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204774604576631063939483984.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Simonton D. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person and process perspectives. Psych. Bull. (2003) 129(4):475–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonton D. Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist (2004) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith S, Paulus P, Nijstad B. The constraining effects of initial ideas. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 15–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith S, Ward T, Schumacher J. Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory and Cognition (1993) 21(6):837–845Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strobe W, Nijstad B, Rietzschel E. Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2010) 43:157–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan E. A group effort: More companies are turning to the wisdom of the crowd to find ways to innovate. Marketing News (2010) February 28):22–28Google Scholar
• Tedjamulia S, Dean D, Olsen D, Albrecht C. Motivating content contributions to online communities: Toward a more comprehensive theory. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2005) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ulrich K. Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (2009) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multi-agent problem solving. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1529–1543Link, Google Scholar
• Torrance E. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (1966) (Personnel Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Toubia O. Idea generation, creativity, incentives. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):411–425Link, Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch B, Saatcioglu A, Fay S. Idea management: A systemic view. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43(2):259–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward T. Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psych. (1994) 27(1):1–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92(4):548–573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisberg R, Sternberg RJ. Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. Handbook of Creativity (1999) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 226–250Google Scholar
• Weiss T. The suggestion box 2.0. Forbes (2006) December 12). http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/12/leadership-innovation-software-lead-innovation-cx_tw_1212ideas.htmlGoogle Scholar
• West M. Ideas are ten a penny: It's team implementation not idea generation that counts. Appl. Psych.: An Internat. Rev. (2002) 51(3):411–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chen P, Pavlou P. Open innovation: An empirical study of online contests. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Inform Systems (2009) (Association for Information Systems, Altanta) Google Scholar