How Costly Is Diversity? Affirmative Action in Light of Gender Differences in Competitiveness

References

• Allen AL, Cahn SM. The role model arument and faculty diversity. The Affirmative Action Debate (1995) (Routledge, New York) 121–134Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Blank R, Ashenfelter O, Card D. Race and gender in the labor market. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) 3c(Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam) 3144–3259Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Vesterlund L. Which is the fair sex: Gender differences in altruism. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):293–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Avery C, Zemsky P. Mentoring and diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):765–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Sutter M. Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory. Science (2012) 335(3):579–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quart. J. Econom. (2009) 124(4):1497–1540Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock KF. The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2001) 55(1):3–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S. Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 59(5):960–970Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S, Bowden EM. Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1997) 23(2):157–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black S, Strahan PE. The division of spoils: Rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(4):814–831Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM. The US gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2006) 60(1):45–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth AL, Nolen PJ. Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2012) 81(2):542–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(3):367–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calsamiglia C, Franke J, Rey-Biel P. The incentive effects of affirmative action in a real-effort tournament. (2010) . Working paper, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
• Campbell A. A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Krueger AB. Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants? Evidence from california and texas. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2005) 58(3):416–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung K-S. Role models and arguments for affirmative action. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(3):640–648Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coate S, Loury GC. Will affirmative-action policies eliminate negative stereotypes? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(5):1220–1240Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature (2009) 47(2):448–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daly M, Wilson M. Sex, Evolution, and Behavior (1983) 2nd ed.(Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (2000) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ, Plott CR, Smith VL. Men, women, and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results (2008) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 1061–1073Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U. z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(2):171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fréchette GR, Maniquet F, Morelli M. Incumbents' interests and gender quotas. Amer. J. Political Sci. (2008) 52(4):891–907Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer RG, Loury GC. Affirmative action and its mythology. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(3):147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard K, List J. Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica (2009) 77(3):1637–1664Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(August):1049–1074Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 40(4):715–742Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harwarth I, Maline M, DeBra E. Women's colleges in the united States: History, issues, and challenges. (1997) . Report, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Hewlett SA, Luce CB. Off ramps and on-ramps, keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2005) 83(3):43–54Google Scholar
• Holzer H, Neumark D. Assessing affirmative action. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 38(3):483–568Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones MP. Quota legislation and the election of women: Learning from the costa rican experience. J. Politics (2004) 66(4):1203–1223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips L, Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Calibration and probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 306–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long MC. College applications and the effect of affirmative action. J. Econometrics (2004) 121(1–2):319–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath G, Samuelson L, Shaked A. Endogenous inequality in integrated labor markets with two-sided search. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(1):46–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobius MM, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblat T. Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. (2011) . NBER Working Paper 17014, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(3):1067–1101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L. Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. J. Econom. Perspect. (2010) 24(2):129–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L. Gender and competition. Ann. Rev. Econom. (2011) 3:601–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L. How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. (2008) . NBER Working Paper 13923, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L. Can changing the prizes affect gender gaps in competitive task selection? An experimental approach. (2012) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Page SE. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies (2007) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Pope D, Sydnor J. Geographic variation in the gender differences in test scores. J. Econom. Perspect. (2010) 24(2):95–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts T-A, Nolen-Hoeksama S. Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback. Sex Roles (1989) 21(11–12):725–747Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruble DN, Martin CL, Berenbaum SA, Damon W, Lerner RM. Gender development. Handbook of Child Psychology (2006) 6th ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 858–932Chap. 14Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Rützler D. Gender differences in competition emerge early in life: Three-year old girls compete as much as boys, but older girls don't. (2010) . Working paper, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaGoogle Scholar
• The University Record Study finds “opportunity gap” for women in business schools. (2000) May 22). http://www.ur.umich.edu/9900/May22_00/8.htmGoogle Scholar
• Weber A, Zulehner C. Female hires and the success of start-up firms. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. (2010) 100(2):358–361Crossref, Google Scholar