The Evolving Impact of Combinatorial Opportunities and Exhaustion on Innovation by Business Groups as Market Development Increases: The Case of Taiwan

References

• Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:425–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida H, Wolfenzon D. A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. J. Finance (2006) 61:2637–2681Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman NS. An introduction to kernel and nearest neighbor nonparametric regression. Amer. Statistician (1992) 46:175–185Google Scholar
• Amsden AH, Chu WW. Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amsden A, Hikino T. Project execution capability, organizational know-how and conglomerate corporate growth in late industrialization. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3:111–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aoki M, Aoki M. Risk-sharing in the corporate group. The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm (1984) (North-Holland, New York) 259–264Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Berkovitz T. Innovation in business groups. Management Sci. (2010) 56:519–535Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom DE, Khanna T. The urban revolution. Finance and Development (IMF Quarterly) (2007) 44(3). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2007/09/pdf/bloom.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, van Reenen J. Market shares, market value, and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66:529–554Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Burt RS. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110:349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carney M, Gedajlovic E, Huegens P, Van Essen M, van Oosterhout J. Business group affiliation, performance, context, and strategy: A meta analysis. Acad. Management J. (2011) 54:437–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacar A, Vissa B. Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business group affiliation. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:933–946Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti A, Vidal E, Mitchell W. Business transformation in heterogeneous environments: The impact of market development and firm strength on growth and retrenchment reconfiguration. Global Strategy J. (2011) 1:6-26Google Scholar
• Chang S-J. Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis, Restructuring, and New Growth (2008) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chang S-J, Hong J. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:429–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S-J, Chung CN, Mahmood IP. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation: A tale of two emerging economies. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:637–656Link, Google Scholar
• Chung C-N. Markets, culture and institutions: The emergence of large business groups in Taiwan, 1950s–1970s. J. Management Stud. (2001) 38:719–745Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung C-N, Mahmood IP, Chang S-J. Strategy, structure and performance over time: Taiwanese business groups in institutional transition. Business Groups in Asia (2006) (Oxford University Press, New York) 70–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang LHP. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. J. Financial Econom. (2000) 52:81–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Klepper S. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econom. Statistics (1996) 78:232–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2004) . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:95–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature (1988) 26:1120–1171Google Scholar
• Dyer J. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:271–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edquist C. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations (1997) (Pinter, London) Google Scholar
• Einhorn B. Why Taiwan matters. Business Week (2005) May 16):76–81Google Scholar
• Entwisle B, Faust K, Rindfuss RR, Kaneda T. Networks and contexts: Variation in the structure of social ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 112:1495–1533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst D. What permits small firms to compete in high-tech industries? Inter-organizational knowledge creation in the Taiwanese computer industry. (1998) . DRUID Working Paper 98-3, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen. Accessed October 24, 2012, http://openarchive.cbs.dk/handle/10398/8110?show=fullGoogle Scholar
• Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47:117–132Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:909–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry (1977) 40:35–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan SA. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:1193–1201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerlach M. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business (1992) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Indust. Corporate Change (1995) 4:93–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M, Smelser N, Swedberg R. Business groups and social organization. Handbook of Economic Sociology (2005) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 429–450Google Scholar
• Greene WH. Econometric Analysis (2003) Second Edition.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28:1661–1707Google Scholar
• Hansen MT. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:232–250Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall B, Griliches Z. Economic models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE. Know-how complementarities and knowledge transfer within firms: The case of R&D. Management Sci. (1994) 40:1720–1747Link, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ. POLCON_2005 Codebook (2007) . Accessed April 11, 2007, http://www-management.wharton.upenn.edu/henisz/Google Scholar
• Hobday M. Innovation in East Asia (1995) (Edward Elgar, Hants, UK) Google Scholar
• Hoshi T, Kashyap A, Scharfstein D. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106:33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keister LA. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China's transition economy. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 104:404–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keister LA. Exchange structures in transition: Lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66:336–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75:41–51Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance (2000a) 55:867–891Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Acad. Management J. (2000b) 43:268–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu KG. Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution (2010) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Rivkin JW. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:333–352Link, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Thomas C. Synchronicity and firm interlocks in an emerging market. J. Financial Econom. (2009) 92:182–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Yafeh Y. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. J. Bus. (2005) 78:301–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Yafeh Y. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? J. Econom. Literature (2007) 45:331–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu KG, Srinivasan S. Disclosure practices of foreign companies interacting with U.S. markets. J. Accounting Res. (2004) 42:475–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim L. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397Link, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance (1999) 54:471–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leff N. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in developing countries: The economic groups. Econom. Development and Cultural Change (1978) 26:661–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln JR, Gerlach ML, Ahmadjian CA. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:67–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Link AN, Long JE. The simple economics of basic scientific research: A test of Nelson's diversification hypothesis. J. Indust. Econom. (1981) 30:105–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundvall B-A. National Systems of Innovation (1992) (Pinter, London) Google Scholar
• Luo X, Chung C-N. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:404–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmood IP, Mitchell W. Two faces: Effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1348–1365Link, Google Scholar
• Mahmood IP, Singh J. Technological dynamism in Asia. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1031–1054Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmood IP, Zheng WT. Whether and how: Effects of international joint ventures on local innovation in an emerging economy. Res. Policy (2009) 38:1489–1503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmood IP, Zhu H, Zajac EJ. Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management J. (2011) 32:820–848Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro LF, Arvidsson N, Birkinshaw J. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19:90–107Link, Google Scholar
• Moody J, White DR. Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68:103–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morck R, Yeung B. Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice (2004) 28:391–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. (1959) 67:297–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• North DC. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Numazaki I. Networks of Taiwanese big business: A preliminary analysis. Modern China (1986) 12:487–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orru M, Biggart N, Hamilton G, Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. Organizational isomorphism in East Asia. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 361–389Google Scholar
• Palepu K. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:239–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Stern S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy (2002) 31:899–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portes A. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1998) 24:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Management (2007) 33:479–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Zingales L. Financial dependence and growth. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:559–586Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:101–133Google Scholar
• Robinson PM. Semiparametric econometrics. J. Appl. Econometrics (1988) 3:35–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic S. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49:751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, MacDonald G. How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. (2004) 50:1319–1333Link, Google Scholar
• Saxenian AL. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Saxonhouse GR. What does Japanese trade structure tell us about Japanese trade policy? J. Econom. Perspect. (1993) 7:21–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1113–1126Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Teece DJ. Inter-organizational requirements of the innovation process. Managerial Decision Econom. (1989) 10(Special Issue):35–42Google Scholar
• Useem M. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. (1984) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:674–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111:447–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105:493–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• World Economic ForumWorld Competitiveness Report (1986) (World Economic Forum, Cologne, Germany) Google Scholar
• World Economic ForumWorld Competitiveness Report (1990) (World Economic Forum, Cologne, Germany) Google Scholar
• World Economic ForumWorld Competitiveness Report (1994) (World Economic Forum, Cologne, Germany) Google Scholar
• World Economic ForumGlobal Competitiveness Report (1998) (World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland) Google Scholar
• Yang CH. The effects of strengthening intellectual property rights in NIEs: Evidence from Taiwan's 1994 patent reform. Contemporary Econom. Policy (2008) 26(2):259–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu DP. Analysis of IPR strategies for firms located in Hsinchu science industrial park. (1998) . Project report, Institute of Economics of Academia Sinica, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
• Zelner B. Using simulation to interpret and present logit and probit results. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30:1335–1348Crossref, Google Scholar