Engineering Trust: Reciprocity in the Production of Reputation Information

References

• Ai C, Norton EC. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(1):123–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G. The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Ockenfels A, Roth AE. An experimental analysis of ending rules in Internet auctions. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(4):790–809Google Scholar
• Ba S, Pavlou P. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortaçsu A. The winner's curse, reserve prices and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):329–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortaçsu A. Economic insights from Internet auctions. J. Econom. Literature (2004) 42(2):457–486Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Isaac H, Tadelis S. Seller reputation. Foundations Trends Microeconomics (2008) 4(4):273–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Ockenfels A, Cook KS, Snijders C, Buskens V, Cheshire C. The limits of trust in economic transactions: Investigations of perfect reputation systems. eTrust: Forming Relationships in the Online World (2009) (Russell Sage, New York) 15–36Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Ockenfels A. Does laboratory trading mirror behavior in real world markets? Fair bargaining and competitive bidding on eBay. (2011) . Working paper, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Bolton G, Ockenfels A. Behavioral economic engineering. J. Econom. Psych. (2012) 33(3):665–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Katok E, Ockenfels A. How effective are online reputation mechanisms? An experimental study. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1587–1602Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Katok E, Ockenfels A. Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. J. Public Econom. (2005) 89(8):1457–1468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Ebeling F. Information value and externalities in reputation building. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2011) 29(1):23–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Figueras N. An exploration of reputation formation in experimental games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2003) 50(1):89–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bretz RD, Milkovich GT, Read W. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. J. Management (1992) 18(2):321–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J, Morgan J. Reputation in online markets: The market for trust. California Management Rev. (2006) 49(1):61–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunner C, Goeree JK, Holt CA, Ledyard JO. An experimental test of combinatorial FCC spectrum auctions. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics (2010) 2(1):39–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Hortaçsu A. The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from eBay. J. Indust. Econom. (2010) 58(1):54–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF. Behavioral Game Theory (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Weigelt K. Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica (1988) 56(1):1–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K, Morgan J. An economics wind tunnel: The science of business engineering. Experimental and Behavioral Economics—Advances in Applied Microeconomics (2005) 13(Elsevier Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX. Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(1):431–457Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sönmez T. School choice: An experimental study. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 127(1):202–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper M, Konstan J, Li SX. Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100(4):1358–1398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Dhar T. Differences in “truthiness” across online reputation mechanisms. (2007) . Working paper, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
• Cooper D, Kagel J, Kagel J, Roth A. Other-regarding preferences. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (2012) 2(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Doukidis G, Mylonopoulos N, Pouloudi N. Building trust on-line: The design of robust reputation mechanisms for online trading communities. Social and Economic Transformation in the Digital Era (2004) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 95–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Wood CA. The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. (2008) 54(3):460–476Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Hsu V. Trust in electronic markets: Price discovery in generalist versus specialty online auctions. (2001) . Working paper, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
• Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M. The economics of credence goods: On the role of liability, verifiability, reputation and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(2):526–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton DH. The impact of reputation timing and source on auction outcomes. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy (2007) 7(1). Article 33Google Scholar
• Ederington LH, Dewally M. Reputation, certification, warranties, and information as remedies for seller-buyer information asymmetries: Lessons from the online comic book market. J. Bus. (2006) 79(2):693–729Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspectives (2000) 14(3):159–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greif A. Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: Evidence on the Maghribi traders. J. Econom. History (1989) 49(4):857–882Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Kremer K, Macho V. An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 (2004) (Ges. für Wiss, Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen) 79–93GWDG Bericht 63Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Ockenfels A, Sadrieh A, Peitz M, Waldfogel J. Internet auctions. Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy (2012) (Oxford University Press, New York) 306–342Google Scholar
• Grether DM, Isaac RM, Plott CR. The allocation of landing rights by unanimity among competitors. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71(2):166–171Google Scholar
• Grosskopf B, Sarin R. Is reputation good or bad? An experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100(5):2187–2204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Mengel F, Ockenfels A. An evolutionary analysis of buyer insurance and seller reputation in online markets. Theory Decision (2007) 63(3):265–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrmann B, Thöni C, Gächter S. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science (2008) 319(5868):1362–1367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houser D, Wooders J. Reputation in auctions: Theory and evidence from eBay. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2005) 15(2):353–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jian L, MacKie-Mason J, Resnick P. I scratched yours: The prevalence of reciprocation in feedback provision on eBay. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy (2010) 10(1). Article 92Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Kato A. Price, quality and reputation: Evidence from an online field experiment. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):983–1005Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Roth AE. The dynamics of reorganization in matching markets: A laboratory experiment motivated by a natural experiment. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(1):201–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanam K, McIntyre S. Returns to reputation in online auction markets. (2001) . Retail Workbench Working Paper W-RW01-02, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• Klein TJ, Lambertz C, Spagnolo G, Stahl KO. Last minute feedback. (2007) . Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Kreps DM, Wilson R. Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):253–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwasnica AM, Ledyard JO, Porter D, DeMartini C. A new and improved design for multiobject iterative auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):419–434Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis G. Asymmetric information, adverse selection and online disclosure: The case of eBay motors. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(4):1535–1546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston JA. How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of Internet auctions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2005) 87(3):453–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livingston JA, Evans WN. Do bidders in Internet auctions trust sellers? A structural model of bidder behavior on eBay. (2004) . Working paper, Bentley University, Waltham, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D, Bryan D, Prasad N, Reeves D. Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2007) 55(2):223–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald CG, Slawson VC. Reputation in an Internet auction market. Econom. Inquiry (2002) 40(3):633–650Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnik MI, Alm J. Does a seller's reputation matter? Evidence from eBay auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(3):337–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. Putting Auction Theory to Work (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, North D, Weingast B. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econom. Politics (1990) 2(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller N, Resnick P, Zeckhauser R. Eliciting informative feedback: The peer prediction method. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1359–1373Link, Google Scholar
• Muniz J, Garcia-Cueto E, Lozano LM. Item formation and the psychometric properties of the eysenck personality questionnaire. Personality Individual Differences (2005) 38(1):61–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neral J, Ochs J. The sequential equilibrium theory of reputation building: A further test. Econometrica (1992) 60(5):1151–1169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Roth AE. The gastroenterology fellowship market: Should there be a match? Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. (2005) 95(2):372–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A. Reputationsmechanismen auf Internet-marktplattformen: Theorie und empirie. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (2003) 73(3):295–315Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Resnick P, Bolton G, Croson R. Negotiating reputations. The Oxford Handbook of Conflict Resolution (2012) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 223–237Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Roth AE. Late and multiple bidding in second price Internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 55(2):297–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement (2000) (Continuum, London) Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y. Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the U.S.. (2012) . Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, RichardsonGoogle Scholar
• Plott CR. Market architectures, institutional landscapes and testbed experiments. Econom. Theory (1994) 4(1):3–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(1):7–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C, Topel RH. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1993) 37(2–3):355–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichling F. Effects of reputation mechanisms on fraud prevention in eBay auctions. (2004) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Baye MR. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce (2002) 11(JAI Press, Amsterdam) 127–157Advances in Applied MicroeconomicsCrossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Friedman E, Kuwabara K. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(12):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood L. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(2):79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE. The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Fisher-Schultz lecture. Econometrica (2002) 70(4):1341–1378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE. What have we learned from market design? Econom. J. (2008) 118(527):285–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Ockenfels A. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1093–1103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R, Stöcker R. End behavior in sequences of finite prisoner's dilemma supergames. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1986) 7(1):47–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Haigner S, Kocher M. Choosing the stick or the carrot?—Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2010) 77(4):1540–1566Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R, Roth AE. Reputations in games and markets. Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 27–62Crossref, Google Scholar