Biased Judgment in Censored Environments

References

• Amemiya T. Tobit models: A survey. J. Econometrics (1984) 24:3–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behfar K, Peterson R, Mannix EA, Trochim W. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. (2008) 93:170–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Source of Collinearity (1980) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomfield RJ, Hales J. Predicting the next step of a random walk: Experimental evidence of regime-shifting beliefs. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 65(3):397–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):519–538Link, Google Scholar
• Bostian AJ, Holt CA, Smith AM. Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):590–608Link, Google Scholar
• Brenner LA, Koehler DJ, Tversky A. On the evaluation of one-sided evidence. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1996) 9(1):59–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell A, Whitehead J, Finkelstein S. Why good leaders make bad decisions. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2009) 87(2):60–66Google Scholar
• Chapman GB, Johnson EJ. Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79(2):115–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L. Dynamic pricing with active learning under two-sided censoring. (2012) . Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Chen L, Kök AG, Tong JD. The effect of payment schemes on inventory decisions: The role of mental accounting. Management Sci. (2013) 59(2):436–451Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Behavioral Sciences (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K. Impact of POS data sharing on supply chain management: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):323–336Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell JC. Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psych. Rev. (2005) 112(4):951–978Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell JC. Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psych. Rev. (2007) 114(1):177–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM. Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psych. Rev. (1978) 85(5):395–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Gilovich T. Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psych. Sci. (2001) 12(5):391–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Gilovich T. Are adjustments insufficient? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2004) 30(4):447–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Gilovich T. The anchoring and adjustment heuristic. Psych. Sci. (2006) 17(4):311–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feiler DC. Managerial underestimation of employee capability. (2012) . Working paper, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
• Fiedler K. Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psych. Rev. (2000) 107(4):659–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiedler K, Juslin P, Fiedler K, Juslin P. Taking the interface between mind and environment seriously. Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 3–32Google Scholar
• Gilovich TR. How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Hansson P, Juslin P, Winman A. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2008) 34(5):1027–1042Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harpaz G, Lee WY, Winkler RL. Learning, experimentation, and the optimal output decisions of a competitive firm. Management Sci. (1982) 28(6):589–603Link, Google Scholar
• Hau R, Pleskac TJ, Kiefer J, Hertwig R. The description-experience gap in risky choice: The role of sample size and experienced probabilities. J. Behav. Decision Making (2008) 21(5):493–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Klayman J. Cognitive repairs: How organizational practices can compensate for individual shortcomings. Res. Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:1–37Google Scholar
• Hertwig R, Barron G, Weber EU, Erev I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psych. Sci. (2004) 15(8):524–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Lim N, Cui TT. Reference-dependence in multi-location newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. (2010) 56(11):1891–1910Link, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM. Educating Intuition (2001) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, McKenzie CRM, Gibbs BJ, Marquis MA. Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1991) 17(4):734–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K, Northcraft G, Neale M. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P, Winman A, Hansson P. The naive intuitive statistician: A naive sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. Psych. Rev. (2007) 114(3):678–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P, Winman A, Olsson H. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect. Psych. Rev. (2000) 107(2):384–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psych. (1972) 3(3):430–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klayman J, Ha YW. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psych. Rev. (1987) 94(2):211–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler JJ, Mercer M. Selection neglect in mutual fund advertisements. Management Sci. (2009) 55(7):1107–1121Link, Google Scholar
• Koehler JJ, Thompson WC. Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches. Law Human Behav. (2006) 30(4):455–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Moritz B, Siemsen E. Demand forecasting behavior: System neglect and change detection. Management Sci. (2011) 57(10):1827–1843Link, Google Scholar
• Lariviere MA, Porteus EL. Stalking information: Bayesian inventory management with unobserved lost sales. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):346–363Link, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Wu G. Claiming a large slice of a small pie: Asymmetric disconfirmation in negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2007) 93(2):212–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lejuez CW, Read JP, Kahler CW, Richards JB, Ramsey SE, Stuart GL, et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (2002) 8(2):75–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lejuez CW, Aklin WM, Jones HA, Richards JB, Strong DR, Kahler CW, et al. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experiment. Clinical Psychopharm. (2003) 11(1):26–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM. Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 108(2):315–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacLeod C, Campbell L. Memory accessibility and probability judgments: An experimental evaluation of the availability heuristic. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63(6):890–902Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddox WT, Ashby FG, Bohil CJ. Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2003) 29(4):650–662Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March JG. Learning to be risk averse. Psych. Rev. (1996) 103(2):309–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markle A. Asymmetric disconfirmation in managerial beliefs about employee motivation. (2009) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Markle A. Dysfunctional learning in decision processes: The case of employee reciprocity. Strategic Management J. (2011) 32(13):1411–1425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massey C, Wu G. Detecting regime shifts: The causes of under- and overreaction. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):932–947Link, Google Scholar
• Muller A, Stoyan D. Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (2002) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Mynatt CR, Doherty ME, Tweney RD. Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. (1977) 29(February):85–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahmias S. Demand estimation in lost sales inventory systems. Naval Res. Logist. (1994) 41(6):739–757Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. (1998) 2(2):175–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY. Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. (2011) 57(6):1111–1137Link, Google Scholar
• Pleskac TJ. Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2008) 34(1):167–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudi N, Drake D. Observation bias: The impact of demand censoring on newsvendor level and adjustment behavior. (2011) . Working Paper 12-042, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420Link, Google Scholar
• Sichel DE. Business cycle asymmetry: A deeper look. Econom. Inquiry (1993) 31(2):224–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman GK, Loewenstein GF, Anderson BL, Ubel PA, Zinberg S, Schulkin J. Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: A randomized trial of physicians. J. Medical Ethics (2010) 36(5):265–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. (1990) 41(1):1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons TL, Peterson RS. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(1):102–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart N, Chater N, Brown GDA. Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psych. (2006) 53(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strack F, Mussweiler T. Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1997) 73(3):437–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):566–589Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psych. (1973) 5(2):207–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky D, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp LL. Learning asymmetries in real business cycles. J. Monetary Econom. (2006) 53(4):753–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veldkamp LL. Slow boom, sudden crash. J. Econom. Inquiry (2005) 124(2):230–257Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS, Pleskac TJ, Lejuez CW. Modeling behavior in a clinically-diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psych. Rev. (2005) 112(4):862–880Crossref, Google Scholar