Solving Constrained Consumption–Investment Problems by Simulation of Artificial Market Strategies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1623

References

  • Bodie Z, Merton RC, Samuelson WF. Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life cycle model. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1992) 16(3–4):427–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouchard B, Ekeland I, Touzi N. On the Malliavin approach to Monte Carlo approximation of conditional expectations. Finance Stochastics (2004) 8(1):45–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandt MW, Goyal A, Santa-Clara P, Stroud JR. A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability. Rev. Financial Stud. (2005) 18(3):831–873CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan MJ, Xia Y. Stochastic interest rates and the bond-stock mix. Eur. Finance Rev. (2000) 4(2):197–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan MJ, Schwartz ES, Lagnado R. Strategic asset allocation. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1997) 21(8–9):1377–1403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucks BK, Kennickell AB, Mach TL, Moore KB. Changes in U.S. family finances from 2004 to 2007: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Bull. (2009) 95(February):A1–A56Google Scholar
  • Campbell JY, Viceira LM. Who should buy long-term bonds? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(1):99–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carriere JF. Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Insurance: Math. Econom. (1996) 19(1):19–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen PO, Larsen K, Munk C. Equilibrium in securities markets with heterogeneous investors and unspanned income risk. J. Econom. Theory (2012) 147(3):1035–1063CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cocco JF, Gomes FJ, Maenhout PJ. Consumption and portfolio choice over the life cycle. Rev. Financial Stud. (2005) 18(2):491–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Karatzas I. Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1992) 2(4):767–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Goukasian L, Zapatero F. Monte Carlo computation of optimal portfolios in complete markets. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2003) 27(6):971–986CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cvitanić J, Schachermayer W, Wang H. Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment. Finance Stochastics (2001) 5(2):259–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das SR, Sundaram RK. An approximation algorithm for optimal consumption/investment problems. Intelligent Systems Accounting, Finance Management (2002) 11(2):55–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detemple J, Garcia R, Rindisbacher M. A Monte-Carlo method for optimal portfolios. J. Finance (2003) 58(1):401–446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fahim A, Touzi N, Warin X. A probabilistic numerical method for fully nonlinear parabolic PDEs. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2011) 21(4):1322–1364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garlappi L, Skoulakis G. Solving consumption and portfolio choice problems: The state variable decomposition method. Rev. Financial Stud. (2010) 23(9):3346–3400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hakansson NH. Optimal investment and consumption strategies under risk for a class of utility functions. Econometrica (1970) 38(5):587–607CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haugh MB, Kogan L, Wang J. Evaluating portfolio policies: A duality approach. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(3):405–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson V. Explicit solutions to an optimal portfolio choice problem with stochastic income. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2005) 29(7):1237–1266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karatzas I, Lehoczky JP, Shreve SE, Xu G-L. Martingale and duality methods for utility maximization in an incomplete market. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1991) 29(3):702–730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogan L, Uppal R. Risk aversion and optimal portfolio policies in partial and general equilibrium economies. (2000) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  • Koijen RSJ, Nijman TE, Werker BJM. Appendix describing the numerical method used in “When can life-cycle investors benefit from time-varying bond risk premia?”. (2007) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Koijen RSJ, Nijman TE, Werker BJM. When can life-cycle investors benefit from time-varying bond risk premia? Rev. Financial Stud. (2010) 23(2):741–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraft H, Munk C. Optimal housing, consumption, and investment decisions over the life-cycle. Management Sci. (2011) 57(6):1025–1041LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kushner HJ, Dupuis PG. Numerical Methods for Stochastic Control Problems in Continuous Time, Applications of Mathematics (2001) 242nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Liu J. Portfolio selection in stochastic environments. Rev. Financial Stud. (2007) 20(1):1–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES. Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(1):113–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RC. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econom. Theory (1971) 3(4):373–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Munk C. Optimal consumption-investment policies with undiversifiable income risk and liquidity constraints. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2000) 24(9):1315–1343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Munk C. Numerical methods for continuous-time, continuous-state stochastic control problems: Experiences from Merton's problem. Appl. Math. Comput. (2003) 136(1):47–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Munk C, Sørensen C. Dynamic asset allocation with stochastic income and interest rates. J. Financial Econom. (2010) 96(3):433–462CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen C. Dynamic asset allocation and fixed income management. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1999) 34(4):513–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Svensson LEO, Werner IM. Nontraded assets in incomplete markets. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1993) 37(5):1149–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Binsbergen JH, Brandt MW. Solving dynamic portfolio choice problems by recursing on optimized portfolio weights or on the value function? Computational Econom. (2007) 29(3–4):355–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Hemert O. Household interest rate risk management. Real Estate Econom. (2010) 38(3):467–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vasicek O. An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J. Financial Econom. (1977) 5(2):177–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viceira LM. Optimal portfolio choice for long-horizon investors with nontradable labor income. J. Finance (2001) 56(2):433–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao R, Zhang HH. Optimal consumption and portfolio choices with risky housing and borrowing constraints. Rev. Financial Stud. (2005) 18(1):197–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.