Information Acquisition During Online Decision Making: A Model-Based Exploration Using Eye-Tracking Data

References

• Ball C. A comparison of single-step and multi-step transition analyses of multiattribute decision strategies. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1997) 69(3):195–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR. An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Behavior (1979) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Kakkar P. Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. J. Consumer Res. (1977) 3(4):233–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Park CW. Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(3):234–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive consumer choice process. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):187–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chib S. Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(432):1313–1321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP. Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. (2006) 96(5):1737–1768Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. (2001) 24(1):87–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Beck JC. The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business (2001) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• eBizMBA Top 15 most popular comparison shopping websites, November 2012. (2012) . Retrieved December 10, 2011, http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/shopping-websitesGoogle Scholar
• Feng G. Time course and hazard function: A distributional analysis of fixation duration in reading. J. Eye Movement Res. (2009) 3(2):1–22Google Scholar
• Fine S, Singer Y, Tishby N. The hierarchical hidden Markov model: Analysis and applications. Machine Learn. (1998) 32(1):41–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilchrist IV, Harvey M. Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search. Visual Cognition (2006) 14(4/5/6/7/8):704–715Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaholt MG, Reingold EM. Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: A further test of the gaze cascade model. Attention, Perception, Psychophysics (2009) 71(3):445–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard JA, Sheth JN. The Theory of Buyer Behavior (1969) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Johnson CI, Mayer RE. An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. (2012) 18(2):178–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Willemsen MC. Process models deserve process data: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, & Hertwig. Psych. Rev. (2008) 115(1):263–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Rangel A. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2011) 108(33):13852–13857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajbich I, Armel C, Rangel A. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience (2010) 13(10):1292–1298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krantz DH, Kunreuther HC. Goals and plans in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making (2007) 2(3):137–168Google Scholar
• Lee BK, Lee WN. The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an online environment. Psych. Marketing (2004) 21(3):159–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liechty J, Pieters R, Wedel M. Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a Bayesian hidden Markov model. Psychometrika (2003) 68(4):519–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohse G, Johnson E. A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1996) 68(1):28–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marois R, Ivanoff J. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cognitive Sci. (2005) 9(6):296–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA. Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Payne JW. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1976) 16(2):366–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Venkatraman V, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Kühberger A, Ranyard R. Opening the black box: Conclusions to a handbook of processing methods for decision research. A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research: A Critical Review and User's Guide (2011) (Taylor & Francis, New York) 223–249Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Warlop L. Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. Internat. J. Res. in Marketing (1999) 16(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayner K. Eye movement in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psych. Bull. (1998) 24(3):372–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reutskaja E, Nagel R, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. Am. Econ. Rev. (2011) 101(2):900–926Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert CP, Celeux G, Diebolt J. Bayesian estimation of hidden Markov chains: A stochastic implementation. Statist. Probab. Lett. (1993) 16(1):77–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roe RM, Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT. Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psych. Rev. (2001) 108(2):370–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Senders JW, et al. Adaptation of cognitive processes to the eye movement system. Eye Movements and the Higher Psychological Functions (1978) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 89–109Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Leclerc F. An eye-fixation analysis of choice process for consumer nondurables. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(2):274–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Rosen LD. An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory Cognition (1975) 3(3):267–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvucci DD, Anderson JR. Tracing eye movement protocols with cognitive process models. Proc. Twentieth Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (1998) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 923–928Google Scholar
• Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Kuhberger A, Ranyard R. The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making. Judgment Decision Making (2011) 6(8):733–739Google Scholar
• Scott SL. Bayesian methods for hidden Markov models: Recursive computing in the 21st century. J. Amer. Statistic. Assoc. (2002) 97(457):337–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimojo S, Simion C, Shimojo E, Scheier C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience (2003) 6(12):1317–1322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H, Greenberger M. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest (1971) (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
• Simon H. Rationality as process and as product of thought. Am. Econ. Rev. (1978) 68:1–16Google Scholar
• Spalek TM, Hammad S. The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psych. Sci. (2005) 16(1):15–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stüttgen P, Boatwright P, Monroe RT. A satisficing choice model. Marketing Sci. (2012) 31(6):878–899Link, Google Scholar
• Swait J, Adamowicz W. The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(1):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tatler BW, Vincent BT. Systematic tendencies in scene viewing. J. Eye Movement Res. (2008) 2(2):1–18Google Scholar
• van der Lans R, Pieters R, Wedel M. Eye movement analysis of search effectiveness. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2008) 103(482):452–461Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber EU, Johnson EJ. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. (2009) 60:53–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R. Eye fixation on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):297–312Link, Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R. Eye-tracking for visual marketing. Foundations Trends in Marketing (2008) 1(4):231–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedell DH, Senter SM. Looking and weighting in judgment and choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1997) 70(1):41–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willemsen MC, Böckenholt U, Johnson EJ. Choice by value encoding and value construction: Processes of loss aversion. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (2011) 140(3):303–324Crossref, Google Scholar