The Fragility of Commitment

References

• Bagwell K. Commitment and observability in games. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 8:271–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baye M, Morgan J. Price dispersion in the lab and on the Internet: Theory and evidence. RAND J. Econom. (2004) 35:449–466Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Geanakoplos J, Klemperer P. Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and strategic complements. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:488–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit AK, Skeath S. Games of Strategy (2004) 2nd ed.(W. W. Norton & Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Goeree J, Holt C, Palfrey T. Regular quantal response equilibrium. Experiment. Econom. (2005) 8:347–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacMillan I, McCaffery M, Van Wijk G. Competitors' responses to easily imitated new products-exploring commercial banking product introductions. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:75–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey R, Palfrey T. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10:6–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey R, Palfrey T. Quantal response equilibria for extensive form games. Experiment. Econom. (1998) 1:9–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Várdy F. An experimental study of commitment and observability in Stackelberg games with observation costs. Games Econom. Behav. (2004) 49:401–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Várdy F. The value of commitment in contests and tournaments when observation is costly. Games Econom. Behav. (2007) 60:326–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Damme E, Hurkens S. Games with imperfectly observable commitment. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 21:282–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Várdy F. The value of commitment in Stackelberg games with observation costs. Games Econom. Behav. (2004) 49:374–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Stackelberg H. Marktform und Gleichgewicht (1934) (Springer-Verlag, Vienna/Berlin) Google Scholar